preview

Civic Engagement's Effect On Society

Decent Essays

Among a new generation of millennials is an increasing thought that the government is less reliable than our predecessors thought it to be. Such an increase in skepticism would imply that younger people are less likely to aid their country through civic service, right? Wrong! According to recent polls, newer generations have actually been more involved in their communities via civic participation because of their motivation to improve their country through their own actions. With this recent increase in civic engagement, innovative ways of encouraging more volunteers are being considered to increase participation even more. One of these methods is a national service requirement for society that would make it mandatory for citizens to engage …show more content…

Positively, if there were a requirement, then exponentially more people will go out and volunteer. Currently, around “27% of Americans engage in civic life by volunteering” and “70% of Americans” believe that a service requirement is a good idea (Stengel 1). According to Stengel, a possible institutions like the “health corps”, the “green corps”, the “rapid-response reserve corps”, and even a “national-service academy” could further specialize aspects of civic engagement to promote the welfare of society through the engagement of its people (Stengel 3). Although these options sound well and with good intentions, the consequences of ‘forcing’ people to volunteer might cause problems for those searching for employment. Michael Kinsley, in his article, outlines a hypothetical scenario suggesting that making somebody “’volunteer’ for a necessary job that he or she otherwise would not take, [then] someone else is going to lose that job” (Kinsley 2). In a country whose unemployment rate is currently 4.5% bringing the total number of unemployed persons to a whopping 14.3 million, it can be devastating to push people into jobs that would otherwise be favorable to someone who would need it otherwise (United States). On a societal level, this requirement could do good for the whole country, but may have unforeseen side effects that …show more content…

For the purposes of my comparison I will be referring to the plan outlined in Richard Stengel’s “A Time to Serve” article. Potential downsides to the individual might be what is mentioned above, that somebody might take a job that I may desperately need for their volunteer work that I would otherwise have received out of necessity. Considering that I am a student at the moment, this consequence does not weigh too much on my opinion. One that does though is the moral factor that “if everybody has to” engage in civic service, “then it’s not voluntary” at all, and I wouldn’t otherwise feel the satisfaction that I was helping somebody out of altruism (Kinsley 1). Though this weighs down on people morally it isn’t all that bad either because an incentive to volunteer can be beneficial to the individual. If I were to be offered “$19,000 by the time” I’m twenty for dedicating “at least one year” of my life to “national or military service”, then I would certainly benefit from it because that money could go towards paying my college tuition or my first home (Stengel 2). The benefits to me for serving my country are relatively significant, and in the process it helps out my country thereby making required service a win-win for the individual and

Get Access