Civil Disobedience Examples

Each act of disobedience directs attention towards a specific idea, and prompts the society to talk about it. It also gives licesnse for the liberated members of that society to form their own opinions about the idea. Since the protest harms no one, save the individual who is willing to face the consequences of breaking the law in question. It does not infringe on any other individual's rights. Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on a free society since it educates that society's members and may lead to more liberty for them, which would create a freer

Though, I feel strongly that no law should be broken, I do see purpose in the peaceful disobedience provided you are willing to suffer the consequences. Therefore I would have to agree that it positively impacts a free society. We are all under strict laws and it is our freedom to either obey or not, with the latter resulting in consequence. Take for instance, the protest against injustice, the harmless act that took place in the Negro movement with Martin L. King. Not to mention the fact pointed out in Arguments against Civil Disobedience, sums up the fact that if we do not argue a point, another point would never be made. Not all situations are to be defended but some should. It is like a growth among us, which completely leads me to disagree with (as mentioned in the attacks), self-law making. There must be a form of discussion taking place (within certain levels of citizens) in order to advance in changes to laws as they were originally written. That is what makes us a free society.

In my opinion, peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. The whole point of a "free society" is where the people have a say and are able to stand up for what they believe in. If a law seems unjust to them, they should have the right to protest it or disobey it, as long as it is done peacefully. Martin Luther King is one of the most influential leaders in history. Without his non-violent protests and civil disobedience, the unjust laws of segregation might still be in place. One of my favorite quotes from MLK's "Letter From Birmingham Jail" is when

A peaceful resistance to laws positively impact the society because in the first amendment it authorizes "the right of the people peaceably to assemble". If the society were not able to protest, how would that be a free society?. Freedom of speech is the first thing a person has and can do with out being punished for. Just as Thomas Jefferson said, "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so". Anyone can come forward and protest for what they believe in. Many people do believe civil disobedience is wrong and causes many to hold back their own opinions or ideas, but people must remember that it is okay to do.Its positive in many ways to stand for what is right just in a peaceful manner because once it

Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. This peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society and overtime, makes it more “free.” Remonstrating unjust laws also reveals how corrupt our society today is as a whole considering the hatred and retaliation exerted towards protestors. Overall, civil disobedience is necessary for society to adapt to the new norms of the forever-changing world.

What is nonviolent disobedience and what events have exemplified Dr.King's message? Nonviolent civil disobedience is a type of political action that relies on deliberately breaking laws. By doing this, people are calling attention to the unjust laws and punishments of pursuing a just cause. For example, for two weeks in April of 1947 volunteers for the Congress of Racial Equality rode 26 busses in Southern States. Many of them were repeatedly arrested, while others were mobbed by angry whites. On January 29, 1961, James Meredith, an African American and air force veteran submitted an application for the all white university of Mississippi. He was refused by the administration until the NAACF brought a suit against the University. As a result,

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

Civil disobedience plays a positive, important and vital role in maintaining an active, passionate and free society. In the past it's course has shown to encourage and escort a variety of social reforms into developed stages that would be inferably unachievable without the roles that the right to civil disobedience has played. The framework of our country acts to prevent factions for fear of an inherent violent nature of displeased citizens. However civil disobedience proves the capabilities of a dissatisfied public to organize without relying on brutal force. Peaceful demonstrations display what I believe to be the core of our country. Land of the free, advocate of freedom of speech, and the right of the people to assemble peacefully; America

I believe that civil disobedience can be a problem and also a benefactor in any country with a strong central government. Civil disobedience is often taken out of context in many situations around the world, such as the riots in Ferguson, Missouri beginning in 2014. These riots started after an African American teen named Michael Brown was shot and killed by a Caucasian police officer named Darren Wilson. The officer claimed he was acting in self-defense and that Brown had come charging at him, after the officer had tried to confront him over a robbery he had been associated with. The people involved believed they were fighting for a just cause and soon became violent with government officials when they didn’t get their way. This is one of the times where civil disobedience can hurt a country,

Although laws and obedience are needed for a safe, structured, and organized society, where would our country be today without those who peacefully resisted unjust laws? This country's heroes are known for speaking out against things that were wrong with society, and it is still going on today. Without people who not only realize, but speak out about the things that society must change, no progress would be made in terms of a free society.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. America itself was built on the concept of adapting to meet the changing needs of society; its government outline was created so that the people could change laws when they needed to be changed, although the process is slow so as to avoid laws that are poorly thought out or do not represent the views of most American citizens. At several points in American history, there are times where only a few groups were fairly represented in government, and therefore, the needs of all the people were not represented accurately and we could not get the change we needed to happen. This is where civil disobedience comes into play - by peacefully and respectfully disobeying unjust laws that oppress American citizens, we get the attention of government officials who can do something to change the laws and right the wrongs that have been committed. Some well-known examples of this are the Women’s Suffrage movement and the Civil Right movement, as well as some recent examples, such as the Standing Rock protesters. By using peaceful protesting, we draw attention to injustices and garner the support and strength to say “no more”.

Time and again, humans have rattled the bars of injustice within their societies. With fire and sword they have attempted to melt and slice these bars to achieve some degree of dignity and freedom. Yet, ironically, it is with this fire and sword that they force others behind similar bars of injustice. Only those who understand that violence and physical force are not keys to freedom truly break free; and it is the actions of these that prove and ensure the dignity and development of the free if flawed, society in which we live. This is civil disobedience.

Yes, peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society and history can speak for this. Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the most famous people to protest the laws of the United States. He believed the preamble statement

Civil disobedience and peaceful protest have been and caused a great impact on this country. The United States of America is something that has been greatly changed by these acts and continues to change due to the act of civil disobedience by the countries citizens. The use of peaceful protest and resistance to a law in a free society is something that impacts it for the better of the nation.

Negative or positive? Does civil disobedience have a negative and positive effect? Civil disobedience is so much more than the eyes see, and yes, American citizens have the right to disobey civilly. There is no way we can have a world full of peace and no disagreements. So I believe civil disobedience is an effective way to eliminate most of the violence that results from disagreements. It has a positive effect on everyone around, and it also shows a higher level of maturity for the peaceful resistors. Civil disobedience has been a prominent factor in American history. First, Henry David Thoreau defined the understood with his essay “Civil Disobedience”, then Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement participants exemplified what was written in his essay, along with the women's right participants. How do humans respond to civil disobedience?