Civil Disobedience Research Papers

When your human rights are being stripped, it is a great way to change society, as we see in Gandhi’s peaceful revolt. However, in many cases it is not necessary. It would do even more damage, especially if there are other, safer and more human ways for addressing concerns. Laws would be threatened as well as American infrastructure and economy. Through this, civil disobedience requires us to examine the situation. It requires intelligent people to sacrifice something for the greater good, and when it is necessary. The people thinking about disobeying must ask the question “is the law I am being pushed under unjust?” before performing the act. As Gandhi once said “An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so. Now the law of nonviolence says that violence should be resisted not by counter-violence but by nonviolence. This I do by breaking the law and by peacefully submitting to arrest and

From Cherokee Indians refusing to abandon their homes in 1838 to the Sit-ins of the civil rIghts movement in the early 1960s, people have been using acts of civil disobedience to stand against injustice they saw in their communities. Although there are many examples of people abusing this benefit and causing more grief and shame than progress, many have used it to their advantage to bring about positive change for the greater good of society, therefore acts of civil disobedience can positively impact a free society if they remain peaceful, respectful, and justified.

Brilliantly put by what many deem to be America’s greatest president of all time, Abraham Lincoln, “Let every man remember that to violate the law is to trample on the blood of his father, and to tear the charter of his own and his children’s liberty.” Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to comply with certain laws as a form of political protest. Although many may argue that this is the sole way to keep the government in check and to make minorities heard, rational people will realize that it is not this disrespect of the law that proves the democracy of our nation.

If we take a closer look at civil disobedience, we can better understand what it means, its goals, and its outcomes. Civil disobedience predominantly exists as direct and non-violent government defiance. Instead of voicing an opinion with a vote or a simple conversation, civil disobedience stands up for what is right using an individual’s whole influence. Therefore, some sacrifices regarding the legality of actions are made in order to preserve the integrity of the mission. In other words, why should a protester follow the law that they are trying to alter? That doesn’t make much sense, therefore civil disobedience allows unjust laws to be broken for the greater good. This method is very effective if, for example, a minority is attempting to

The human race doesn’t take injustice lying down. Over the past hundred years, there has been many examples of people taking a stand for their own rights and freedoms through acts of civil disobedience, defined as “the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest”. While a quick glance at today’s society does show a much more accepting and proper view of people of every race, religion and sexuality, our world does not come without its injustices. I believe that these major injustices keep civil disobedience extremely relevant in our current, modern world.

Have you ever heard of civil disobedience? It is a way of peaceful protest that has been used successfully in the past and in the present. Walkouts, boycotts, and marches are all forms of civil disobedience that have been used and are currently being used. During past four years, there have been women's rights marches, pro-choice marches, and kneeling during the national anthem. These are people that are actively trying to create a fair society themselves and for the people around them. As the real world awaits, civil disobedience is a way to live in a fair society, preserve independence, and refine your moral compass.

The United States of America was founded by rebellious English men, who would not stand for inequality. As time progressed, the rebellions shifted from wars full of bloodshed to peaceful protest and civil disobedient. Many people feel that civil disobedience is wrong ways to act on issues. A greater amount of Americans feel that civil disobedience is the strongest and most effective way to get change to the issues. I agree that civil disobedience shakes America into making a deliberate change.

We must be careful not to mistake for civil disobedience what is actually all too often these days, rather uncivil disobedience, in the forms of riots and looting and other forms of criminal conduct that sometimes takes place in the course of large-scale protests and demonstrations that get out of hand. The modern fathers of civil disobedience as a method of political expression and change are, of course, Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King, in the 1950s and 1960s, convinced hundreds and thousands of black Americans to peacefully agitate towards full legal and political equality in the United States. Both men -- and their followers -- faced police and military might and ruthlessness, and both suffered imprisonment, and worse, for their efforts. His followers and supporters, endured tremendous brutality and degradation, but instead of responding in the way they were being treated, they reacted peacefully, offering themselves as living sacrifices for the causes in which they believed.

In the United States Constitution we the people were given a right to freedom of speech. People have taken to this right given to us by the Founding Fathers. But, one problem rises to the top with a right that has so much freedom, civil disobedience. It’s a topic that we are seeing more of in our society today. Civil disobedience is a threat against our free society due to people not taking our laws serious enough.

We must do what we can to call out injustices and stand up for those whose rights have been stepped on without violating the rights of others, and civil disobedience is the best way to call attention to an injustice, garner support, and seek change. Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on free societies because without it, the societies aren’t free - if we are unable to protest against what is wrong, can we say we are truly

When someone decides to be civilly disobedient it is usually because they are passionate about what they are fighting for and when you are passionate about something you, more often than not, will follow all of the proper steps to make it happen, so that there is a higher percentage that you will get the desired effect. As stated by the Texas Politics Project, “ While civil disobedience – breaking the law to call attention to the perceived immorality or illegitimacy of a particular law or set of laws – may be either violent or non-violent, non-violent resistance is deeply engrained in the American political experience.” Protests can be legal and peaceful, but mob mentality often takes over because these people are passionate. They’re fighting for their rights and when people get passionate they want to fight and a lot of times the need to fight and the mob mentality gets the better of people. People want to see change in the system and to fight for that change they are forced to comply with the vary system that they want to change. To legally protest you have to have a license from the government. You have to go to the organization you want to protest against, in this case the government, and ask their permission to publicly discredit their work. I see a flaw in this. We must remember that just because someone participates in a violent riot that doesn’t mean they are wrong, that their opinion and research is any less

Looking closer at the time period and situation of the civil rights movement reveals that civil disobedience is in fact negative to present day society. The Civil Rights Movements used a combination of peaceful protests and civil disobedience to attain their goals. There are two reasons why civil disobedience worked back then: There was no social media and the protesters knew that they could die even if they protested peacefully. 42 people were killed because of their involvement in the Civil Rights Movement from 1955-1968. (Southern Poverty Law Center) Nowadays, a protester knows he or she will not be murdered a few days after the protest because he or she participated in it. This lack of fear empowers protesters to push further their level of civil disobedience to the point where it's an unnecessary and violent act that hurts society. Another major difference between then and now is the use of social media. “Before the advent of social media, on any given day an individual might have had the opportunity to share his or her feelings about an unfolding political event with, at most, 10 or 15 people. Now with a few strokes of the keyboard or swipes of a mobile phone, people can make their thoughts known instantly to hundreds or thousands of others. Moreover, the fact that these thoughts are spread through social networks that individuals have

Civil disobedience isn’t uncommon in America, but the modern idea of civil disobedience has become flawed and distorted from its original intent. Currently, there are thousands of causes and ideals that are spastically flung around and just as soon forgotten. This is because the guise of civil disobedience is often abused by people simply to attract publicity. These methods of claimed civil disobedience often do little to nothing in working towards the goal that they claim to stand for, or their intensions are vague and unclear. For example, in the news, the most popular recent controversial example of civil disobedience is the kneeling during the national anthem before a football game. At its manifestation, this movement was intended to protest the inequalities in the treatment of races by the police especially in Chicago. This effectively accomplished nothing. It raised awareness but the majority of intelligent civilians were already aware of the inequalities. The flaw of this example is that the form of disobedience

America has always lauded itself as a sanctuary to democracy and personal freedom. Like our constitution itself, this country has the adaptability to change with the times and right previous wrongs in an attempt to come as close as possible to a perfect, utopian society. Change and reform are vital to this process, allowing us to self-evaluate and improve. From Thoreau’s single night in prison to Dr. King’s peaceful marches and protests to more modern examples in light of recent political events, civil disobedience has been the method of choice to bring about this change, both at home and in other parts of the world.

In order for one to accurately distinguish and comprehend the concept of civil disobedience, we must first discuss the extremity of these passive resistances and who is allowed to overstep these boundaries. Our country is fundamentally based on Democracy, and with this the United States constitution created a decree of secured freedom and sanctioned one’s ability to express their own personal ideology. However, the vision that our founding fathers had for this country’s future has been distorted. With the alteration and revision of various laws, the U.S. government has built an even stronger and forceful domination over their citizens. When it comes