Civil War Compromise

At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave and free. In the years leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between proslavery and antislavery factions within the U.S. Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the delicate balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress came up with a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.

What is the Missouri compromise? The Missouri compromise was an effort by the senate and the house of representative to maintain a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states. There was a long debate whether or not missouri was going to become a state or not, but that changed when Maine became a state. They did this so that there would still be an equal balance between the slave states and the free states.

territory. As northern settlers poured into Kansas, however, in 1861 it qualified for admission to the union as a state where slavery was illegal. So many Northerners were distraught over the Kansas-Nebraska Act that they founded a new, purely northern, purely anti-slavery political party. the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new lands, repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and allowed settlers in those territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries. The initial purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to create opportunities for a Transcontinental Railroad. It was not problematic until popular jurisdiction was written into the proposal. The act was designed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois. The act established that settlers could vote to decide whether to allow slavery, in the name of "popular sovereignty" or rule of the people. Douglas hoped it would ease relations in both North and South, because the South could expand slavery to new territories but the North still had the right to abolish slavery in their states. He was wrong; opponents denounced the law as a privilege to the slave power of the South. The new Republican Party, which was created in opposition to the act, aimed to stop the expansion of slavery, and soon emerged as the dominant force throughout the

Since Missouri’s population was composed of 16 percent slaves, it would be admitted as a slave state therefore upsetting the balance in favor of the south. Northerners didn’t like this because Missouri was at the same latitude as the free states of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and because of this they feared that it would set a precedent for slave states coming more north. The north and south continued to argue and argue over the issue of slavery. The north accused the south of trying to extend the institution of slavery and the south said that the north was conspiring to destroy the Union and end slavery. To resolve this crisis, congress passed a series of agreements that became known as the Missouri Compromise, which smoothed over the crisis. In 1820, Congress admitted Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state in order to balance the number of free and slave states and to keep order between the north and south. Also, it prohibited slavery in the remainder of the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri. This compromise soon fell apart after it was passed. Missouri drafted its own Constitution saying that free blacks were prohibited from entering their territory. Because of this provision, which was against the federal Constitution stating that citizens of one state were entitled to the same rights as citizens of other states, antislavery northerners

In 1854 another problem arose which resulted in Congress passing the Kansas-Nebraska Act which repealed the Missouri Compromise, this act was introduced by Stephen A. Douglas a chairman of Committee on Territories, this act allowed the people of Kansas and Nebraska to choose rather they wanted slavery in their boundary or not through the power of popular sovereignty, the Pro-slavery settlers won the election but were charged with accusations that they cheated, in order to make sure that the vote was right they ordered a re-election but the Pro-slavery refused and the refusal resulted into a battle. John Brown an Anti-slavery leader who believed that he was sent here by god to kill anyone who was pro-slavery. He led the anti-slavery force which gained the nickname “Bleeding Kansas”. The fight was soon stopped, and a final election was held, this time the anti-slavery settlers won the vote and was announced that Kansas would become a free state in 1861. In conclusion the Compromises and Acts may have had their flaws but it they some how manage to solve the slavery issues.

The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely

The Kansas-Nebraska act (1854) was a U.S. law that authorized the creation of Kansas and Nebraska, west of the states of Missouri and Iowa and divided by the 40th parallel. It repealed a provision of the Missouri compromise of 1820 that prohibited slavery in the territories north of 36 degrees and 30' and stipulated that the inhabitant of the territories should decide for themselves the legality of slave holding. Democratic senator of Illinois Stephen A. Douglas pushed the Kansas-Nebraska bill.

The Missouri Compromise is accounted for to have been passed in 1820 to keep up an adjust of energy in Congress between the slavery and bondage Free States. The law showed Missouri as a slave state and Maine a sans slave state. Moreover, the law consumed bondage in Louisiana region. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 canceled the law and after three years the Supreme Court controlled the Missouri trade off law as unlawful and the Congress had no expert at an opportunity to consume slavery in the domains.

Through the Missouri Compromise of 1820 the US. Senate and the House of Representatives’ hoped to ease the conflict between the slaveholding states and the free states by maintaining a balance of power in the House and the Senate. The Missouri Compromise would divide the country at the 36◦ 30’ parallel—a line drawn 36 30’ north—the southern border of Kentucky and Virginia, and the northernmost border of Texas—between the pro-slavery South and the anti-slavery North (Heaton, 2002). This

The missour compromise, north wanted the state to be free of slaves while south wanted it to be involved with slavery. Now in the end, it was decided that Maine was to be the free state and Missouri was given the ok to adopt a constitution having no restrictions on slavery. This compromise was the foundation of conflict for the north and south regarding slavery. The kansas-nebraska allowed each territory to make the decision on the issue of slavery. This compromie violated the first compromise, missouri. Because of this violence begin in many parts of America, and later became better known as the civil war. Third compromise was the nullification, power to nullify, or invalidate any federal law in which the state thinks it is unconstiutional.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to defuse the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a land in which slavery would be allowed. At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave states and free states. (Missouri Compromise , 2016) The Compromise of 1850 was laws admitting California as a free state, creating Utah and New Mexico territories with the question of slavery in each to be determined by popular sovereignty, settling a Texas-New Mexico boundary dispute in the former’s favor, ending the slave trade in Washington, D.C. and making it easier for southerners to recover fugitive slaves. (Compromise of 1850, 2016) The Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had many similarities. Both attempted to balance the slave nations, added states into the Union, encouraged Sectionalism in the North and South, and they influenced the Civil War. Each sectional would affect the balance of power between the North and South greatly. Both the Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 had many similarities, although alike in many ways one major conflict would be the path they each would bear upon the balance of force between the Northern States and Southern States.

The Missouri Compromise was an attempt to settle the conflict of slavery between North and South. In this compromise Missouri entered the union as a slave state while, Maine entered as a free state. This was an attempt to keep the free and slave states balanced. This compromise didn’t work in the long run because an unbalanced union was inevitable. Both views would continue to battle for the upper hand. The North and South both felt equally that their views were superior and right (275, 412)

The Compromise of 1820 was an attempt to halt the expansion of slavery. Maine was added as a state but with a prior ruling stating the number of slave states must equal the number of non­slave states, Missouri was admitted as slave state with the agreement that future states (bought during the Louisiana Purchase) north of the latitude marking Missouri’s southern border would be free, while all future states south of the latitude would be open to slavery. But the Missouri Compromise did little to resolve the answer of slavery. The Kansas­Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri Compromise allowing the states to determine their slave status through popular sovereignty. The Missouri Compromise drew a specific line in the country which divided its

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one instance in which Congress failed to compromise as a nation, which divided the North and South more.The Kansas-Nebraska Act entitled each territory to have the opportunity to decide the imposition of slavery on their land, based on popular sovereignty. Stephen A. Douglas, a Illinois senator established the act. Douglas’ intentions for the act were to ultimately see Nebraska made into a territory, along with the desire for Kansas, an inclined state, to support slavery to hopefully in result, gain full southern support. The Kansas-Nebraska act undid the Missouri Compromise, which ultimately prevented the Union from corrupting. With the violation of the Missouri Compromise, the act took law, enraging the North.

As a result of Missouri’s request to become a state in the Union, there was much debate over whether the new state would allow slavery or be a free state. In order to appease both sides, Missouri was admitted as a slave state alongside Maine, which became a free state.