preview

Civil War: Why Did The North Win?

Decent Essays

The Civil War: Why Did the North Win? Strategies of the North and South The Civil War was one of the bloodiest wars in American history. So many lives were lost in battle in this war any many were severely harmed. Many believe that the war was fought over the expansion of slavery to the West. This is true, however, it is not the only reason the Civil War took place. Missouri wanted to enter as a slave state and many people were worried that this was going to alter the balance of the Senate (“Political Issues Leading to Civil War”, 2015). The court decision in the Dred Scott case caused an up-roar in the states and contributed to the reasoning behind the Civil War. It was said that “once you’re a slave, you are property, and you have no rights” …show more content…

Neither the Union or Confederacy armies had the experience of being in battle. Majority of the soldiers were just everyday people; they were volunteers so they did not have much discipline. This showed when the Union took their first shot and attempted to attack at Richmond, which was the Southern capital (“Opening Moves of the Civil War”, 2015). Unfortunately, the North was not victorious at this battle and Lincoln felt the need to find a new leader. George B. McClellan was the next leader in line to become the commander of the Union army. McClellan did his job correctly for a while by managing to get the men back stabilized, and soon it was time for change again. Because of the incompetence of the leadership in the Union army, the South saw this as a weakness. However, this could be a strength of the North. Since Lincoln constantly change the leadership, this could throw off the Confederate armies because they would never know what is next to come. The Union’s moves could not be easily tracked because each leader had different tactics and strategies. Leaders in the Union were either organized, incompetent, or aggressive (Heidler D. & Heidler J., 2015), thus giving the Union one up on the opposing side in some …show more content…

Grant. Grant was the final leader that led the Union to victory over the Confederacy in the war. Gant was in charge of a brigade and he handled his brigade extremely well during an “indecisive action” (Gale, 2008) in Belmont, Missouri. After his actions at Belmont, Grant had two plans to take over Fort Henry and Fort Donelson. These were two forts belonging to the Confederacy. Grant approached both with aggressiveness and by “naval river gunboats” (Gale, 2008). His tactics were different than the other leaders before him even though he shared some of their aggressiveness. Grant planned counterattacks and closely paid attention to the actions of the Confederacy. Grant knew the Confederacy would try to focus their efforts on him, so he split his army up (Gale, 2008). The armies were under control of William Sherman, George Thomas, and Philip Sheridan. This was one of Grant’s strategies in order to blind side the Confederacy and take them out little by little. Each of the men captured and crippled the Confederacy with these blind side attacks. Due to the destroyed Confederacy army, “Grant offered Lee terms as magnanimous” (Gale, 2008). He let Lee and his remaining men go home and keep their personal weapons and horses (Gale, 2008), thus ending the stalemate and making the Union

Get Access