Clarence Thomas Case Study

Thomas Jefferson, born 1743 in Virginia, was a self-made man. He had many activities, such as law, and politics in addition to running a 5,000-acre plantation that he inherited from his father. Jefferson graduated from William and Mary College, and was a talented lawyer. Jefferson was an awful public speaker, but he was a great diplomat, which he proved throughout his life. He then went on as a member, Secretary of State, of

As mentioned before, Thomas went on to study law at Yale. An interesting note is that Thomas attended Yale during the same time that ex-president Bill Clinton attended the university. Clinton was enrolled in 1970 and Thomas in 1971. (Thomas 137-8)

There are two major factors that affect the confirmation process of a president’s nominees; one is party affiliation. Party affiliation is very important when the Senate is confirming a nominee, because Senate confirms nominees by a ⅔ vote. This could be very crucial to the president and his or her nominee, because if the majority of the Senate is part of the opposing party, this becomes difficult for the president to get his nominee confirmed. The second political factor is qualification to become a judge or justice. The Senate does not want an unqualified judge who does not know what he or she is doing. It is important to the Senate to approve someone who has experience in the judicial field than someone who has no experience at all. The

The above facts and details of appointments serve as great strengths for Greenburg, but there are also weaknesses she failed to touch on and include in this book. Greenburg fails to consider how the same scare-tactic rhetoric used by democratic and liberal senators nearly every time a conservative justice is nominated as well she only glances and summarizes the events of Thomas’ confirmation hearing and the attempted filibuster of Samuel Alito’s nomination. These accounts would have provided more information and context for the book to give a more well-rounded account of these appointments

“Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court goes on forever,” declared by past President William Howard Taft. Dated in 1789, the Judiciary Act by signed by Congress, which was demanded by the United States Constitution. This past principal court was ruled by a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices, accordingly today we still have a Chief Justice, but we currently have eight Associate Justices. The current Supreme Court has John G. Roberts, Jr. as Chief Justice, and the following are the current Associate Justices: Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. Clarence Thomas, a conservative, best known as the second

As of February. 22, 2016, there has been a ten-year long silence streak in the Supreme Court House. Clarence Thomas sat on the Supreme Court Bench and hasn’t spoken one word in nearly a decade. However, on February. 22, 2016 Thomas left everyone in disbelief when he spoke for the first time in a long time.

Based on the research of Justice Alito, he was appointed by former president Gorge W. Bush as one of the Supreme Court Justices on January 31, 2006 and is currently a Republican Party federal justice. His approaches to things are very unpredictable and distinctive from what he is viewed as. However, his conservative standpoint is still a part of his image. This paper will include: the background of the justice, the judicial philosophy he approaches, and his opinion on a dispute.

The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican

In 1964, president Lyndon B Johnson nominated Thurgood Marshall to serve on the United States Supreme Court. on October 2nd, 1967, so good was sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice, becoming the first African American to serve on the nation's highest court. As a Supreme Court Justice Thurgood supported rulings to uphold a strong protection of individual rights.

Thurgood Marshall was the 96th justice, and the first African American justice to serve in the Supreme Court in the history of United States. Thurgood Marshall was born on July 2, 1908, in Baltimore, Maryland to William Marshall and Norma Marshall. As a child, his parents taught him to respect The U. S Constitution and the rule of law. He attended Baltimore's Colored High and Training School and graduated in 1926. In high school he was a troublemaker and as a punishment he was told to memorize the entire U. S Constitution, which became useful later in his life. Later on, he went to attend Lincoln University, which was an HBCU, where he was suspended two times for playing pranks on other students. He also got involved in some protests against

Clarence Thomas is the very second African American justice to serve on the supreme court of the united states he was controversially appointed in 1991 And leans conservative.

Sonia Sotomayor graduated from the Ivy-league Princeton in 1976 and received her J.D degree from Yale in 1979. She later immediately became an assistant district attorney at Manhattan, being an employer under District Attorney Robert Morgenthau. Later on in her life she Sonia began private practice becoming a partner under the firm Pavia and Harcourt. It was not until August 11, 1992 when President George H.W Bush nominated her for the position of a judge. Sonia Sotomayor was 43 at the time when she was inducted, at the time she is the youngest judge to be inducted. Five years later June 25th, 1997, she was nominated and inducted in the U.S Second Circuit Court of Appeals under President Bill Clinton. She was to be confirmed into the Second

They allude to the unanimous 9-0 decisions the Supreme Court has made as a strong indication that the court remains neutral. Chief Justice Roberts also recently stated at a Boston law school: “We don’t work as Democrats or Republicans” (Savage, 2016, p. 1). Moreover, Justice Scalia, when defending his conservative vote in a 5-4 ruling, claimed: “’I prefer not to take part in the assembling of an apparent but specious unanimity’” (Kuhn, 2014, p. 3). However, decisions become unanimous only when the ideological stakes are not large enough. As for extremely controversial topics, nearly every single recent 5-4 decision has been divided perfectly along ideological lines. The conservative majority, praised by Republicans, has unbelievably struck down major parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, upheld an individual’s right to own guns, and has allowed unlimited corporate spending in campaigns (Kuhn, 2014). These types of decisions have caused the divided Supreme Court that we have today. Looking at a more psychological and scientific perspective on this overall issue, an investigation by Anna Harvey and Michael J. Woodruff of the New York University found that the direction of decision and vote of the Supreme Court is frequently contaminated by confirmation bias; justices seeking out facts and reasoning that

Criminal profiling refers to the inference of offender characteristics. Historically, the use of criminal profiling can be traced back to 38 C.E. when Jews were wrongfully accused of blood libel, also known as the kidnapping and murdering the children of Christians for religious rituals during Jewish holidays (Turvey, 2012). As time progressed, criminal profiling has evolved into the study of crime and criminal behaviors, including mental health and physical evidence surrounding a crime that has been committed in an attempt to identify a likely suspect. However, the validity of scientific evidence as a whole was challenged in the 1993 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 592. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the trial judge was the “gatekeeper” to prevent “junk science” from entering the courtroom and outlined standards, also known as Daubert standards, for expert testimony including, testing, peer review, error rates and acceptability (Turvey, 2012).

I am interested in attending the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University due to the plethora of opportunities that are offered to their law students. I believe that these opportunities are encapsulated by the Scalia Law Advantage, as the law school’s proximity to northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. grant access to an incomparable amount of career opportunities and high-caliber faculty. These features are especially of interest to me as I believe that gaining practical experience in the government, a private law firm, or a non-governmental organization would be integral in developing a legal career. In addition to the exceptional location and professional opportunities, Mason Law’s smaller community and 1:11.8 teacher to student