Cleo 5 To 7 Analysis

The disregard and disrespect for reality is an essential characteristic of postmodern culture. Films like The Thomas Crown Affair, Bullets Over Broadway, Ex Machina and American Hustle all deal with the postmodern sensibility of possessing disdain towards the truth. Viewers are capable of seeing how the preference for spectacle over substance, nostalgia for the past and inability to trust are embodied and resolved in all four films’ central conflicts and themes. The Thomas Crown Affair exemplifies disregard and disrespect for reality within its plot.

This film goes in different directions from the setting to iconography. This is an interesting film that is intense and makes the viewer want to know what is going to happen

To support this idea, Bordwell illustrates how art cinema motivates its narratives differently, through two principles: realism and authorial expressivity. Firstly he proposes the notion that art films reflect realism in their characters, space, and time. Psychologically complex characters are present in real worlds dealing with true-to-life situations. Art cinema is concerned with the characters ‘reaction’ to these situations, rather than their ‘action’. Thus it bares an element of psychological subjectivity as the characters survey the world they are in, which aids the realisation of the distress of

In Jean-Louis Comolli and Jean Narboni’s essay “Cinema/Ideology/Criticism,” they put forward the central argument that film is a commercial product in the capitalist system and therefore also the unconscious instrument of the dominant ideology which produces it. In opposition to the classic film theory that applauds camera as an impartial device to reproduce reality, they argue that what the camera reproduces is merely a refraction of the prevailing ideology. Therefore, the primary and political task for filmmakers is to disrupt this replication of the world as self-evident and the function of film criticism is to identify and evaluate that politics. Comolli and Narboni then suggest seven categories of films confronting ideology in different ways, among which the second category resists the prevailing ideology on two levels. Films of this group not only overtly deal with political contents in order to “attack their ideological assimilation” (Comolli and Narboni 483), but also achieve their goal through breaking down the conventional way of depicting reality.

Movies have the ability to transport people to different times and places and distract them from ordinary everyday reality. They allow for a range of emotions to be experienced. At their core, movies examine the human condition. There are plenty of deeper truths woven into screenplays and plenty of lessons to be learned, even when an individual is solely seeking entertainment.

Although the best reasons for “going to the movies” are to be entertained and eat popcorn, understanding a film is actually quite complex. Movies are not only a reflection of life, they also have the capability of shaping our norms, values, attitudes, and perception of life. Through the media of film, one can find stories of practically anything imaginable and some things unimaginable. Movie-makers use their art to entertain, to promote political agendas, to educate, and to present life as it is, was, or could be. They can present truth, truth as they interpret it, or simply ignore truth altogether. A movie can be a work of fiction, non-fiction, or anything in-between. A film is an artist’s interpretation. What one takes away from a film depends upon how one interprets what has been seen and heard. Understanding film is indeed difficult.

Bart Layton built this doc not from one perspective, but from a collection of them. Some stories, like “The Imposter” need a panoptic approach to connect the audience to the film. The themes of manipulation, identity and love are the main themes conveyed by Layton. These themes are communicated through sounds and visual imagery.

Cinema grants the possibility for an average citizen to escape their mundane life, and delve into a realm of fantasy. However, the film industry fails to act as an instrument in societal progression by instilling superficial ideologies. In this article “Dear Canadian filmmakers…”, Cameron Bailey suggests that Canadian filmmakers ought to shift their perspective by looking more outwards than inwards. As Bailey's emphasizes the significance of producing content that appropriately depicts contemporary Canada. Baileys draws attention to the fact that both, the audience, and the critics have a preference for “drama of real life” based films as opposed to fiction based films. Furthermore, he discusses how filmmakers tend to turn the blind eye to

The film takes a more elliptical, almost a poetical approach to the characters’ lives it shows on screen than the audience might have anticipated from a film of this sort. The whole aim for the editing of this film was to make the audience see the protagonists’ life from his point of view – they wanted the audience to be inside his head, seeing what he’s seeing, hearing what he’s hearing, etc.

The aesthetics of realism in each film can be utilized in many diverse ways to offer certain truths about the world of the film to further express the film’s story. These theatrical elements emphasize what the film attempts to relay to the audience; moreover, it intensifies the authenticity of each aspect of the film. The use of real people, on-camera interviews, textual information, and of direct address to the camera displays the realism of each film.

While watching the video El mundo I noticed that the do not use full sentences as we do in English. Why is that? Another thing that I noticed while watching the captions was that in Spanish they put phrases or words backwards and that is very “interestante”, I learned that word as well. I think that it is intriguing that they spell “interesting” without the “ing”. They way that they communicate is totally different than when speaking in English, but makes it more exciting to learn. I understood the introduction very well because I knew “¿cómo estás” and “Mi nombre es” , it made felt that I’m actually learning some Spanish when I feel like I’m not

    Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.

5. How do you think the filmmakers want the audience to respond? Is there a social justice message? If so, what is it?

What is all about life if an individual can’t be able to enjoy, relate well and have fun within his or her social boundaries? The social aspect is what makes a person to expound on the other aspects of life such as the economy, technology, and politics with minimal barriers. Movies connect the living generation with real-life situations, giving ideas on how to embrace it and live well when subjected to such circumstances.

This is an agreed conception of film and human life, that man is a being with the possibilities of success or failure. We also see that Schatz’s way of thinking is how film and the settings of the culture are with in the film and what drives the film to its climax for the viewer, but at the end it does due what Schatz’s talks about with gangster films.