Collaborative Group Experience

In my small group for the film project analysis project I worked with four other students, Deonte, Frank, Osama, and Stephen. The specific purpose that we came together for was to analyse the film, Oz, The Great and Powerful and identify the different properties of communication in the film and how they were used. We held our group meetings after class three times and once before class. Our group had no clear leader, and instead each member was self-directed, and instead our group came to a general consensus at each meeting as to how tasks should be divided and what should be done before the next meeting. While there were significant setbacks to our group’s progress, aside from one anomaly our group worked well together and had only one major conflict.

In today’s complex and ever changing environment, organization continue to experiment with new forms of team development. Some of the most successful teams bring together employees with different talents and perspectives. In this research report, my aim is to have a clear and deep research on teamwork and how it affects businesses so that I can help Tina and Frank who is coming back from overseas to start their own business. Before could anybody start their business, it is very important to learn certain aspects. Team work is one among them. I have included some of the important information I collected through my research in order to help Tina and Frank succeed in their business.

Group work is an important part of work. In many jobs, group work is a function that is required. Therefore it’s important to develop the skills and practices at University. In this essay I critically analyse my own experiences against the literature.

Group and team work is described as two or more interacting individuals who share collective norms and goals and have a common identity. The size of the group is key, a large group the leader may not catch all. However, a small group becomes more bonded, allowing interaction and shared awareness.

Throughout life there are many instances in which an individual has to work in a group to complete a task/project. The importance of group work is to have teamwork with each member of the group. Humans are driven to connect with each other and by working as a group ideas become much more enriched and the ideas or thoughts that each person ‘brings to the table’ each individual is able to add onto that idea or it can trigger one to think of something completely different.

The author examines four stages of group development that allows the emerging member to discern purpose, role, and collective views. In stage one, dependency and inclusion marks a member’s reliance on the leader or other extroverted members. In stage two counter dependency and fighting is expected as members seek liberation from their leader and strive to merge their goals. In stage three, trust and structure begin as clarity of goals and relationship building take root. In stage four, members have surpassed the hindrances of lower team functioning such as dissatisfaction of roles, and have embraced goal achievement and task accomplishment. In this final stage, “teams are highly cohesive and can expect to be successful” (Wheelan, 2016, p. 29). That said, the author informs

Further the processes of interaction will be examined to evaluate its effectiveness. Effectiveness in this report will be examined according to the degree of positive group experience; one’s learning process as well as the group and individual goals. Conversely, negative team experiences will be used to analyse team dynamics that results from differing expectations, backgrounds and goals.

Humans are social beings who organize themselves into groups that share a common interest and are essential for discovering, developing meaning, and self-worth. Groups are important for everyday work, and they work toward achieving a goal. Groups increase the information of one person by combining ideas and knowledge. They can also help people in their social life through interacting with other people and bypassing their comfort zone. Not much work can be done alone, whereas a group can help solve problems and assist each other in work. Our group shows example of docile, zealous, humble, and diligent whether it be in our group or each members and everyone contribute to keep the group working.

Working in a group setting can cause strain on some individuals, but it also can be helpful to the same individual. Group projects are a major component to both negative and positive effects. There are then easy and hard components of working in a group setting, that can range from person to person. The easiest part of working in a group project was commitment, trust, and motivation. In our group everyone was committed toward getting a great grade and wanting to work for that. Group projects usually tend to have people rely on others to do the work. For this project, for example, I believe my group did not have that issue. We all worked together, splitting parts up for the presentation, including the PowerPoint, annotated bibliography, and

“Helpful Tips for Collaboration in Group Work” provides an excellent template of what it looks like to be a part of something greater than one’s self. It articulates in writing things that I have discovered oftentimes through the hard way with things going wrong in group projects. Like many, I share the frustrations of doing 90% of the work in a group project, in my case it was building a lego robot in the 6th grade. My partner and I had a blast dreaming up the possibility of bringing a robot to class for a project about industrial technology, but that same passion was not transferred to the workload. I relate to being the domineering partner also, through many cultural presentation in the 9th grade where I insisted on controlling the direction of everything the group was doing. If my group members had only known how to use humor and directness as described in this article the group as a whole would of been much more productive. I discovered the importance of setting clear attendance expectations when members of the leadership team I was a part of did not consistently show up, and we did not know what to do because there were

Working in a group can be beneficial but it can also come with hardship that is if others lack the drive and ability to work together. Working in a group takes effort; it takes psychological support, and cooperation. The foundation of group behaviors is something that can come and go but it takes a lot of effort to keep it going after so long. Although these efforts may come and go it is important to consider what it takes to work within a group, successfully. The article I chose to report on deals with the consequences that can come from those who are working in-group settings. It is important to understand what it takes to be productive and this research does the best it can to tackle those issues. It gives us the information we need to succeed and avoid anything that would go against those successes. One of the biggest concerns within group settings is the

The assessment of a high performing team has come to pass and acknowledged. The leadership responsibility develops progressively into work that is conducted remotely, traditional company boundaries are becoming more permeable and collaborations are essential. Developing a team remains as challenge. Enthusiastic, striving, and proficient individuals are always an advantage, but they often signify different purposes, products, and can compete for influence, resources, and advancement. Katzenbach and Smith identify three types of teams. These teams consist of task forces or project groups. Slide 10-3 illustrates their components and functions. Katzenbach and Smith use a triangle to categorize the basics of teams: performance results, personal growth, and collective work. The outer perimeter focuses on skills, accountability and commitment (Barrett, D., 2014). Substantial performance encounters motivate teams unrelatedly of where they are in an organization. However, teams cannot arise s without a routine challenges that is significant to those engaged. Teams that work towards the goals and objectives of a project will encounter different undertakings as part of the action process. To improve communication and involvement, teams use methods that are intended to inspire teamwork, such as outcome-oriented meetings and regular clusters. Teams correspondingly analyze data to make guarantee improvement exertions

the complexity of the group dynamics in the current era which makes these groups difficult to represent in a simple model. Furthermore, it fails to recognize that tasks benefiting the group and contributing to the group’s goal can and do happen at other stages than performing (Hall, 2010). Nonetheless, the model offers a useful framework for the group development through its applied perspective and common sense approach (Bonebright, 2010). The forming stage consists of orientation to the task at hand, gathering information on differences and similarities with other members of the group, desire for the acceptance, establishing communication methods and looking for guidance from the group leader (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977).

Work Team development is a dynamic and often difficult process. Most teams find themselves in a continuos state of change and development. Eventhough, most teams never reach full stability, there is a general pattern that describes how most teams evolve. There are five stages of team development, the first stage is forming. In this stage there is a great deal of uncertainty about the teams purpose, structure and leadership. Members are testing the the waters to determine what types of behaviors are acceptable. This stage is complete when members began to think of themselves as part of the team. The second stage is called storming. In this stage there is much intragroup conflict.Team members accept the existence of the team, but there is resistance to the control that the team imposes on individuality. Conflict can arise from numerous sources within the team setting but generally falls into three categories:communication, factors, structural factors and personal factors (Varney, 1989/Townsley). In addition, there is conflict over who will control the team.

One change I plan on incorporating in my classroom is having students report their findings within group activities. Specifically, designating someone from the group to go out and retrieve information from other groups in regards to their findings. Once that person has obtained the new information reporting it back to their group. In a Science classroom and laboratory, there is a significant emphasis on group collaboration. One of the drawbacks to group work is that it can limit introverted students during the duration of the activity. In a recent article Kimberly Tanner stated “If the decision about who is to share aloud in a class discussion is left entirely to student negotiation, it is no surprise that likely the most extroverted and gregarious