Commentary On 'Fake Bait' By Lethal Experiment

There were a lot of characters almost too much but it fits the book and didn’t ruin the plot (whole book). One of the characters the in the book the author described well was Vera Claythorn (3,4,5). It talked about her personality and her previous job as a games mistress (4). She has to take any job she can get to have some extra money. Also, the author does a good job talking about Dr.Armstrong (10,11,12). Even though the suffix gives it away Dr.Armstrong is a doctor. Dr.Armstrong is also pretty wealthy.

Imagine a life locked away in a cage with no form of control on your existence. It’s cold, dark, and you are scared. You don’t have a choice of what you eat, where you live, or how you are treated. You are unsure if it is day or night or what will happen to you next. You are locked away in a prison cell and you committed no crime. This is the life of a laboratory animal. Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific research purposes and experiments. It can be used for the findings of cures and medicines to testing new drugs, to understanding the behavioral psychology of the animals themselves. “Around fifty to one hundred million vertebrate animals, ranging from fish to primates, are used in experiments each year” (Lloyd). There are

Without appreciation and considerations to morality and religion then it would be difficult to fully comprehend the novel.

With that in mind no matter how I look at it I wish the book would have started in a more interesting manner. It was very hard to start the book simply because it sounded like a regular high school life. Maybe that makes it a more interesting read to put in the realism, and yes I do understand that the book needs to start somewhere; to me it was just a bad start and could have been executed better. Now some people will probably say that it was a better start then how some books start and I definitely agree on that. To me I just wish that the book would have distinguished itself a bit

     I believe that this was a pretty decent book, at times it was boring and

I went into it thinking it would be some lame book trying to convince kids that economics is cool, but the quirky topics and the humor sprinkled throughout the book won me over in the end. The economic aspects of Freakonomics were also much more subtle and less “in your face” than I expected, and I have to admit blending economics into the topics not only helped to make them more factually sound, but they actually made the book more interesting. Levitt’s knowledge and the amount of research he did into each subject he covered was obvious in the book’s content, and Dubner’s ability to present such a large amount of information in both an understandable and entertaining way made this a book a winner on all

I liked that the author leaves the reader to make some conclusions themselves but I thought that the novel was confusing at times because the Blackfoot names for animals were confusing and the author did not provide any major information about what the animals were. The novel was successful in character development, descriptions, dialogue, portraying the characters and developing the story.

The outstanding flaw to me was that the book seemed a bit racist. The dialect given to the black characters was continuously incorrect. For example, “Oh, like your Miss Patterson ain’t...Law, that woman crazy,” both showing incorrect dialect from a black character. Now, looking at a white character’s dialect, “Minny cooks fine...I’m just not so hungry like I used to be.” This character’s dialect

I couldn’t enjoy the book because I found the characters flat and uninteresting. Many of them have no character development-- except for Montag, but his development doesn’t come from a great self

In the end, the book still had it's flaws over the book as a

The book is very well written and was very surprising at parts. The book has lessons in it don’t go where your parents tell you not to go. When you are under investigation for a very serious crime you should not get to even more trouble. Surprising moments made the book good. The most surprising moment was when Buck and tunes who are the main characters almost get shot by a old man named Jumbo.

However, despite the ostensibly interesting plotline, the book is not that enjoyable. The book seemed as if it had such a captivating premise when I discovered it,

"What if someone offered you one hundred thousand US dollars with the only condition that if you accept the money a murderer will be eliminated? Do you accept?

I don't like reading nonfiction books not because they are informational but that I'm not very interested in them. I did like the parts where they were talking about how he had faked his identity and gotten away from the cops. He had no doubt in his voice when he was talking to them so self assured they actually believed him. There were parts when the story was kind of bland without anything interesting happening and there were other parts that you just wanted to learn more about and that kept you reading the book. There were a lot of parts that I hadn't liked about the book like the chapter length and the book length. Both the book and the chapters were short so they couldn't put a lot of information in when I feel like they had left a lot of things out. I know they couldn't tell us about everything but they could have at least make the book around two-hundred and thirty pages instead of the hundred and something pages. I loved how the author went into great detail and put everything that was on each suit he had worn and said. I like how he went into depth about everything and how he figured stuff out. He was only sixteen at the time and somehow stole over 2.5 million dollars. Lastly I like how the author told what happened after all the events in the book and told what certain people had done

Firstly, animal testing method should be nullified because it can bring ethical issue. It is unethical behaviour letting animals to live in a laboratory cage and intentionally causes them in pain, loneliness and fear. According to Ian (2006), animal testing that involves pain, suffering and discomfort under some circumstances are a dominant ethical issue. Most of those experiments cause pain and suffer to the animals that are involved. It reduces the character of life in other way. For example, at Virginia Common Wealth University, a rabbit was no removed from the cage before it was sent through a cage washing system. Cage washing machines typically reach temperatures to up to 180 degrees. One can hardly imagine the pain and distress