preview

Commodity In The Music Industry

Decent Essays

Commodity is a word that is becoming increasingly associated with the music industry, as women are pressured to put out a sexual image. Commodification in the music industry and society has been present for many years. However this ubiquitous injustice has only been highlighted more recently, due to more people speaking out about how wrong it is. I have chosen to write about this topic as I believe is it relevant to today’s society of gender equality. My topic explores all the ideas surrounding my hypothesis of “To what extent has the Female body been commodified in the music industry, from the 1970’s to present day?” Through the use of a questionnaire, my research and history timeline, I aim to link the environment of the music industry to …show more content…

Furthermore it explores the origins of commodification. The author explains how women being seen as commodities, was an idea even before Christ; dating back to 2,000 BC. Women were traded as commodities and “this was seen in arranged marriages between families or villages, women being used to have sex with visitors as a deed of hospitality by tribal chiefs, and the ritual rapes during festivals to insure prosperity.” The writer comments on how these ideologies were enforced from a young age and that they became accustomed to this identification. Edwin Long (1875) “Babylonian marriage market” painting reinforces this idea of women, of young ages, only being there to please men, and depicts women being sold off as brides. The women were seen as slaves who served men. The paler the female the more likely she was to be sold off first, and this is shown in the long line of women who are put in colour order; lightest to darkest. Moreover it highlights the division in race; during the earlier centuries it shows that the lighter you were the more attractive you were deemed to be. The painting was created in 1875; the Victorian era. This era’s mind-set associated women with the domestic sphere, where they were considered physically weaker yet morally superior to men. Females were seen to be inferior to men, meaning they had to abide by men’s rules and …show more content…

Clark (2000) “Women, Gender, and Religion,” talks about how the Ancient Greeks believe men and women were two different species. Men are the superior and women are the inferior. Clark says {“Greek medical writers differ in their ideas about male and female bodies. The Hippocratic school presented men and women as separate species (what we might call a “two sex” model),’ whereas Aristotle considered women to be, ‘Imperfect or defective men in what has been termed a ‘one sex’ model. Women lacked the firm control of bodily boundaries that men had. Women changed shape during pregnancy, and they leaked: blood, tears, and emotion. ‘Since woman does not bound herself, she must be bounded.’ This is achieved by organization of her space, prescription of her gestures, ordering of her rituals, imposition of headgear, attendants, and other trappings.”} This describes women as a completely different and weak species, which have no control over who they are. They are fragmented beings. Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, believed that the way to “bound” the female species was by trapping

Get Access