Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Cesar Chavez

In his first large protest, Cesar went on a long march. When reflecting upon the march Chavez remarked that, “We marched alone at the beginning, but today, we count men of all creeds, nationalities, and occupations in number.” (Chavez, 2) From the very beginning, Chavez brought groups of people together by uniting his small group of protesters with a group of Filipino strikers to create the United Farm Workers. Uniting his group of protesters with the group of striking Filipino workers allowed the protest to become bigger, and therefore more successful. The large numbers also attracted more attention from the media. By uniting groups of strikers, Chavez created a strong protest organization that lasts even today. Another essential group of people Chavez got to join his cause were the consumers. Chavez and his partner Dolores Huerta once wrote, “We called upon our fellow men, and were answered by consumers.” (Chavez, Huerta, 1) Consumers helped the protest by participating in a grape boycott, and did not buy grapes until the grape workers’ needs were met. With this boycott, Chavez tried to weaken the business of the grape growers until they complied, and it worked. When thousands of citizens would not by grapes, the media covered the issue. Through the media coverage, the boycott spread rapidly, uniting people from all over the United States. With the popularity of the boycott, the protest evolved into not just a protest, but a civil rights

One reason Cesar Chavez was an effective leader was because he created a union known as the United Farm Workers. Chavez’s goal was to organize the farmers to receive better pay and better working conditions. He was not the first to attempt, others have tried but failed due to the power of growers. He was different, he gained support through encouragement. His exact words were “si se puede”(Doc A) meaning “it can be done”. He encouraged his supporters to seek their rights as farmers. “ The strongest act of manliness, is to sacrifice ourselves for other in a totally nonviolent struggle for justice”(Doc C). Chavez along

Cesar Chavez was a civil rights activist who organized the earliest Chicano movements. In an essay by Jorge Mariscal, Chavez’s political ideology is

Chavez was a Latino farmer. He migrated to Arizona. Cesar Chavez was working in the South in hot fields and vineyards. After his forceful speech, he was known as a religious and spiritual person. From Chavez’s background, he understands the hard workers

Cesar Chavez once explained the horrors of society when he said, “When the man who feeds the world by toiling in the fields is himself deprived of the basic rights of feeding, sheltering and caring for is family, the whole community of man is sick.” (ufw.org) That means that the whole of humanity is sick and cruel when the man who works the fields all day long to feed the all of the citizens of the entire world can’t even provide for himself. It was not a small amount of people it affected, it was millions, and millions of citizens across the world. Chavez was a large factor in beginning to abolish racism, or also called the Civil Rights Movement.

Cesar Chavez championed for unionization of grape farm workers. Chavez employed strikes, fasts, and boycotts to raise awareness for their cause. Violent retaliation was needless to Chavez so much he believed that the most audacious thing to do was to “sacrifice” one’s self “for others” in the name of justice (Alarcon). Cesar Chavez and his associates were targets of increasing acts of violence. By not meeting violence with violence, their cause fell on listening ears. Cesar and the farm worker’s retaliation consisted of increased dedication and more strikes. Drawing from peaceful protest historical figures such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez was successful with many labor strikes. Chavez could have raised awareness much more rapidly by using violence. However, he “fasted for twenty-five days” for the unerring choice of peaceful protest (Cesar Chavez Gains Grounds for Farmers). Belief in their cause fueled each protester. A single violent outburst from the workers would ripple outward and cause them to lose ground. The farm workers did not make gains without facing hardships. Cesar Chavez’s fast was the result of “increasing advocacy” calling for “violence” among fellow strikers (History.com Staff). As a leader, one must take responsibility for the actions of their supporters. The strikes were beginning to strain. Careful steps were to be taken in order to preserve the strikers’ reason and renew support. Cesar had to challenge their oppressors

Cesar Chavez was an American labor leader and leader of the civil rights movements. Chavez was in search of justice for his people, especially Mexicans and Latinos. He stands up for these people because he saw how their bosses were with those people. Their bosses were treating them like slaves and not paying them the amount of money they should be getting. Chavez was a victim of that and he saw that no one was making any changes and he took the chance and do justice.

A chapter in history can start by the acts of one powerful, passionate, and intelligent human being. Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. are great examples of individuals that turned the tide of history. Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. were similar in many ways; they both believe that non-violent methods were more effective and efficient, they both believed in equality, giving people second chances and forgiveness. Though they had many similarities there was one key difference that differentiated the two, their religion. “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind.

When John F. Kennedy said, “those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable,” there were many people who agreed and disagreed with his statement. I agree with John F. Kennedy because if people/leaders are not willing to protest peacefully, it is because they are asking for violence. Mahatma Gandhi was a leader who hindered the process of violent revolutions by starting his own peaceful revolution using civil disobedience and leading a nation to do the same. Similarly, Martin Luther King Jr. was an activist fighting for equality, freedom and brotherhood between white and black communities. Although both Gandhi and MLK fought for civil rights, freedom of oppression,

In the other hand Gandhi promoted boycotts and he led a large group of people to march 200 mile across western india to get salt and to show an act of nonviolent protest. Some people were arrested including gandhi and he was put in jail but came out because he's health conditions. Most Important these two transcendentalist made some huge sacrifices to make an impact on their society that are in the same way alike, They both isolated themselves from the outside world for a little to figure out what they wanted to accomplish in life sacrificing their lives and their people they were both dedicated to change and give their people the freedom that everyone in this world have. Both of their principals in life were to unite and teach everyone the rights and the freedoms we have and how the world is better when there's no hatred among

Throughout history, the actions of leaders have changed the society in which they lived. In the different periods and time we have met different leaders that made a change and big impact to many people. Two people from different time have made a changed to the society which they lived were Martin Luther and Mohandas Gandhi . These two men were really important and did what they believed in to make a change to the society they lived in.

Gandhi and Mandela both defended human rights, Gandhi defend his rights in India, and Mandela defended his claim in South Africa. Both were non violent, which made them great defenders of human rights. They have risked a lot to get the message out about human rights. Both authors defined what they they did as a whole. Clearly The Long Walk To Freedom and the Eulogy of Gandhi idolize their subjects, but, the author of Gandhi addressed who was a greater defender of human

Robespierre sent people who disagreed with him to the guillotine, Gandhi on the other hand took the patient route and listened then tried to convince those who disagreed with him of his point. Another area that the two differed in opinion was what economy was best suited for their revolution, Robespierre wanted an economy that leaned towards laissez faire or capitalistic market. Gandhi, contrary to Robespierre, wanted a socialistic state of government. While Gandhi and Robespierre disagreed on some things they were still able to accomplish amazing feats, changing their respective countries for better or

This essay will compare two inspiring men that have immensely impacted our world and whose speeches continue to be remembered because of the importance of their content. These two men are Mohandas Gandhi the leader of the Indian Independence Movement, and Martin Luther King Jr. an American Civil Rights Movement Activist. They were leaders in non-violent revolutions for equality and freedom until they were assassinated at the hands of men that did not share their beliefs and hopes of ending discrimination and uniting the people in the world. Gandhi's sole purpose was India's independence from the British Empire, he was born on October 2nd, 1869 in Porbandar, India (Gandhi, 2006) and died on January 30th, 1948 (Paranjape,

Former president John F. Kennedy once said, “The rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.” That means that if we question one person’s rights, we’re questioning everyone’s rights. Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela were both great fighters for human rights. Both men fought for the people in their country that were being oppressed. In The Eulogy for Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela's autobiography, we see the differences these two leaders made, not only in the lives of their people, but in the lives of everyone who has been oppressed. The text about Nelson Mandela is more persuasive than the text about Mahatma Gandhi. The Mandela text talks about the hardship he went through and and how he overcame them and still accomplished his goals.