preview

Compare And Contrast Jamestown And Plymouth Settlement

Better Essays

In the early 1600’s, England sent out its first wave of explorers to colonize in the New world which would send ripples for years to come. Roughly, a little over a decade after the establishment of Jamestown, England sent over another ship that would then colonize a new place in New England known as Plymouth. Although these two were both settled by the English, both became vastly different places by the 1700’s. This is because of the planning, execution, and goals set forth by the two groups and how they overall acted with the land and people around them, which in the end shaped the colonies in more ways than one. For starters, the first group of Englishmen to head for the new world began in 1607. They left with three ships, the Susan Constant, …show more content…

Although, this problem was present in the Plymouth settlement, it was because of different reasons. The first problems became apparent when the group in Jamestown realized they had little in common, where as the Plymouth group had all come over and known each other before the expedition. Instead all these men had different motives and were working towards the bettering of themselves and not one another as a whole. The Jamestown settlement was more selfish than Plymouth. Another issue that added to the ineffectiveness of the colony was that Jamestown was full of noblemen whom had never had the desire or need to work in such laborious fashions until now. Because of this, once declared ruler, in 1608, John Smith stated that “He that will not work, shall not eat.” (Price, 108) Although this helped their current situation, it wasn’t permanent. For years to come, men still tried to tear each other down while building others up, “The colonists were not all in love with each other.” (Price, 85) John Smith would be a very good example. Throughout his time in Jamestown many of his fellow council members and the colonists were constantly attempting to find flaws in his tactics and plans; aything that could potentially end both his rein and occasionally his life. Despite …show more content…

They both established an area of land, had bountiful harvests and a fort for protection in case of a native attack. They both preferred to govern by fear, but also buy their way into the tribes by showering the chiefs with expensive gifts from England. However, it’s also clear that they did things differently right from the start when both colonies set up a system of government very different from one another. “Unlike Virginia, there had never been a royal governor in the northern colonies, and with the outbreak of the English civil war, Puritan New England had enjoyed the benefit of a sympathetic government back in the mother country.” (Philbrick 199)“Each colony was ruled by its own General Court, which included the governor and his assistants and, after 1638 in the case of Plymouth deputies from various towns.” (Philbrick 175)These facts fortify the fact that because the different colonies were governed by different systems, and in turn, they followed different rules when it came to various situations; ultimately this would lead to the colonies being incommensurable by the 1700’s. Although both colonies started and ultimately were two very different places by the start of the 1700’s, the one thing they most definitely had in common; all other planned permanent settlements had

Get Access