Compare And Contrast Lee And Grant

Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee met on April 9, 1865 at Appomattox Court House in Virginia. Both of these men were bringing a stop to the Civil War. The way Grant and Lee led their army were different from each other. Lee was a nobleman who fought hard for his Confederate men. Lee became a symbol for which his men were willing to die for. On the other hand, Grant grew up the hard way through the toughness beyond the mountains. Catton says “ These frontier men were the precise opposites of the tidewater aristocrats”. Grant and Lee represented two different sides of the so called American life. Though having different personalities and beliefs, both Grant and Lee are actually quite similar. They are tremendous fighters who only want one thing--to

Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee are two of the most effective military leaders in American history. These men have become symbolic of the two nations at conflict during the Civil War. Both had very different backgrounds and personalities that caused them to differ in their military leadership and accomplishments. Even though General Lee would surrender his army to General Grant, Lee throughout the course of the war proved himself to be a better military leader.

No matter how much something can differ some characteristics are shared. As strange as it sounds it’s very true, both Grant and Lee are two different yet similar people. As these two fights for what they believe in, though their beliefs are different they share some qualities. Ulysses S. Grant wanted the nation to expand and look forward towards the future. Robert E. Lee thought that an old aristocratic way of life was the better choice and that it can survive and dominant in American life.

Throughout history, there have been people whose names and faces have become synonymous with the time periods in which they lived. For example, Julius Caesar is synonymous with the late Roman Republic and George Washington is synonymous with the American Revolution. Just like these two men, the name Robert E. Lee has become synonymous with the American Civil War. Not only did Lee rise to become the most important and recognizable person in the Southern Confederacy, but his honor and virtuous acts during and after the war made him a hero to modern-day Americans. Even though he fought for what many consider the morally erroneous side of the war, the virtues of his character have made him a figure in American history

In the end of the Civil War. Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant were considered as heroes. The two generals would earn a great reputation and will go down as one of the best generals for the years to come. These two changed, todays American History and how we can know better understand how the war actually came about. We know that these two made life decisions out on the battle field. We know that the both of them gave everything they had for their homeland. Though we know that their choices would represent each other.

The analysis that Catton’s had for the two generals was that they were two strong men that grew differently from each other. For example, General Robert E. Lee grew up believing in traditional, and personified with the English knights and country squires. Also, Lee believed that the lower class should be backed by an ownership of the land so therefore the land would be key source of wealth for the country. However, General Ulysses S. Grant had a completely different mindset from General Robert E. Lee, Grant was looking towards the future and striving to better himself and others in the country. He also believed that you should earn everything and not should be hand giving. Grant only wanted to see the country to succeed and Lee wanted the

Grant and General Robert E. Lee were great at being Generals for their armies but only one could come out on top and that was General Grant. President Lincoln made an amazing choice when he chose General Grant to come and combat General Lee and try to end the Civil War before the end of his term; President Lincoln was up for reelection at this time and know that if he lost the election who ever won would sue for piece and the past four years of fighting would have been for nothing and President Lincoln did not want the lives lost to have been for nothing in the end and the fight for slavery and to keep the country together to have been for nothing as well. General Grant won the war because he did not back down from General Lee and even though it cost him a great deal of men in the process he ended the war and kept the country as a whole instead of two different nations or the south having won and slavery lasting for longer than it actually did in the United States. General Lee on the other hand did put up a good fight and was able to hold off for a while but did in the end fall to General

By the end of the Civil War, much of the country thought of General Robert E. Lee and General Ulysses S. Grant as personal heroes. Despite the outcome of the war, both the Union and the Confederates looked towards their leader with admiration. Both men were viewed as spectacular fighters, who were smart and strategic during the war. However, despite similarities between the two Civil War generals their differences in background experiences, personality traits, and personal underlying aspirations made them not only opposites of each other but the perfect champion for the people they were chosen to lead.

The Actions of U.S. Grant and R.E. Lee and Its Effects on Civil War Just like any war, The Civil War has two sides with different opinion. In one side, the Union Army is following their leader Lt. General Ulysses S Grant. In other side of the battlefield, General Robert E Lee leads the Confederate Army. Does the war fought for slavery? Slavery is part of it but it is not the only reason this war is fought.

Even though Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant were opposing generals during the Civil War, and seemed to be anything but different, they were more similar in ways you would not think of. Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant are similar because, they both were very passionate about what they were fighting for, they also shared the same determination through all challenges they faced, and they also shared the ability to reconcile after the war was over.

Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant fought each other in the bloody Civil War, and they were respected generals and public figures. They shared some common values. For example, both Lee and Grant did not fight for violence, but they led armies to end the county’s fight against itself and bring peace back to America. Lee and Grant were also known for their military strategies that earned the Confederate and the Union numerous battle victories. On the other hand, they each had very different backgrounds that made up their value system. Lee's family represented a past era of knighthood and English squires. Grant, however, grew up beyond the mountains, and he became independent and self sufficient. Lee believed in a class society with inequality.

Before being generals clashing on the battlefield both were students at West Point with slightly different experiences. Robert Lee’s father was in the military, so it was only natural for a true Virginia blood to attend West-Point to join the military (Staff, para. 2). Grant, on the other hand, was actually registered by his father to

I think the similarities he was trying to get across was both Generals abilities to lead in the time of war. Both lee and grant were fighting for something they strongly believed in. I think the other similarity came across was how much both Lee and Grant cared about the nation, enough to put their personal opinions on the back burner to help the nation joined together after the war. Catton is trying to state that two different people that were raised completely differently and born into different environment come together and become some of the most important historical figures in this great Conflict.

The photograph of General Lee gives off a sense of selfishness. From the text, we know that Lee was born into wealth and strongly believes in keeping the privileged upperclassmen the way they are. In his photo, we see Lee in a well-dressed, clean uniform by himself in a room off a sense of isolation from others, possibly a closed mind. Whereas for General Grant, his photo gives a more down to earth feel. A man in ragged clothing, outside where there are chairs and trees is someone who grew up fighting for everything in the West Frontier and never having anything handed to him. Instead, aiming to change the way of the future and not let inequality stick around.

Bruce Catton served in the Navy during World War I, and went on to study the history of the Civil War and write news columns for the nation. Catton’s essay “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts” shows the two very separate lives that future president Ulysses Grant and Robert E Lee, American general were living. On April 9, 1865, Grant and Lee met at the Appomattox Court House in Virginia, where they brought the Civil War to a close. Catton describes each man’s life and upbringing, and how their upbringings had an affect on the way they fought in the Civil War.