The first difference I found between Theseus and Oedipus was the way they ruled their subjects. I feel Theseus abided by a more structured way of ruling, as he was more logical and calculated when he made decisions concerning his community. He believed that everything he was doing was for the best of his subjects. While he was kind and showed true concern for his people, he still ruled his throne with an iron fist. He believed in the concept of logic and law, even taking in Oedipus when he stumbles along the city of Athens looking for refuge from his sins. Theseus proved that he could be a just ruler as he brought all of the inhabitants of his country together through purposeful words and bright ideas. At times I feel Theseus can be seen as manipulative in his actions. I don’t feel Theseus is necessarily manipulative in nature, but he does have the capabilities to use these persuasive speeches for personal gain if he wanted to, and this can make him a dangerous individual. On the other hand Oedipus was well known for his compassionate ruling and loving actions towards his people. He is selfless in his actions and seeks to provide his people with the best future he can offer them. He puts his peoples needs before his own without a second thought. “My poor children…my heart is sadder than yours, for I do not mourn this one or that one, but the entire city. I have brooded over your distress and cast about for some cure” (235-236). I believe this statement lends credit towards how Oedipus is often ruled by his emotions. One of Oedipus’s main downfalls is that he lets his emotions take over his rational thinking. An example of this detrimental behavior is when Oedipus attacks his own father in blind fury and unknowingly completes the first part of the prophecy. Where Oedipus is ruled by emotion, Theseus is ruled by logic. Being ruled by either spectrum of thought can be catastrophic as an emotional ruler can easily be pushed around by their subjects and criticized for their faults, a ruler led by logic would stand by their actions not seeing the fault in their decisions because they believe they know what is best for their subjects.
Another difference between the two kings is their treatment towards the crimes
Three traits that Odysseus and Telemakhos share are clear-headedness, eloquence, and showing strong emotion. They are portrayed with these traits in the Odyssey, composed by Homer. Odysseus is a renowned military strategist, warrior, and the King of Ithaca. He was forced to go to war against Troy twenty years ago, and since then has traveled all over the Aegean trying to find a way back home. Meanwhile, his son, Telemakhos, has developed into a full-grown man from the mere infant he was when his father left for war. He has searched far and wide for news of his father, still hoping, along with his mother, Penelope, that Odysseus is still alive somewhere and somehow, even though most have assumed he is dead. Through his ventures, Telemakhos
Since the beginning of time epic tales have been passed on from generation to generation as a form of entertainment. Even though each epic is different in its plot, every epic has certain features in common. The prime example of their similarities is their main character, the hero of the epic. The hero's behavior changes from the beginning to the end of the tale. Since the plot revolves around the epic hero, in most cases, they are made to seem God-like, or larger then life, in their capabilities and strengths. The hero constantly has to conquer major obstacles to achieve their initial and final goal. Usually the hero is tremendously suspicious of other characters intensions.
There are many legendary epic stories have been passed on from generation to generation in the Greek culture. Even though each story has different outcomes, every epic character has certain features in common. Odysseus in The Odyssesy and Oedipus in Oedipus the King are great examples of epic heroes with a variety of similarities. Odysseus and Oedipus are similar in which they both god-like men who are considered heroes because of their cautious ways and relentless tenacity. On the other hand, Odysseus and Oedipus also demonstrate their crude habits with their hubris behavior throughout their own prophecy. In addition to the similarities, the powerful gods play a significant role which drastically affects
“Oedipus” written by Sophocles and “Odysseus” written by Homer both are Greek poets. Both stories share the same themes in ways where both of the epic heroes endure a conflict. The characters in these plays are attributed certain characteristics by the author. The characteristics suggested by the authors are intrinsic to the audience. They both have a complete and subjective understanding of work. Their characteristics are displayed through the characters actions, what the writer says about them, and what they portray on themselves. This will be the focus of the essay. Both Oedipus and Odysseus, spoken by others, they describe character traits.
Throught Oedipus Rex, Oedipus displays his heroism many times. From the Prologue of the play to the moment in which he leaves Thebes, Oedipus' heroics are extremely apparent; however, at the same time, the decisions which make Oedipus a hero ultimately become the decisions which bring him to shame and exile.
*INTRO*The character Oedipus in the play Oedipus the King by Sophocles, and the character Othello in the play Othello the Moor of Venice by Shakespeare are both tragic characters. Oedipus ends up killing his father, and marrying and having children with his mother, whereas Othello ends up mistrusting and killing his wife. These two individuals have similarities and differences in several aspects such as the roundness of their characters, the retribution that they incur upon themselves and upon their respective wives whether directly or indirectly, and their horrors.
As the play continues, we start to see a shift in Oedipus’s personality. This was due to the conclusion he makes based on the conversation him and the prophet Tiresias has. It mentions how Kreon, Oedipus brother-in-law, is plotting against him. “So? You come here? You have the nerve to face me in my own house? When you’re exposed as its master’s murderer? Caught trying to steal my kinship?” (Sophocles 500). Now, Oedipus is arrogant, he blames Kreon based off of the conclusion he jumps too. He gets discouraged from his role as a leader, he is irrational, angry and hot tempered, whereas, in the beginning,
The main one that stands out for both is their anger issue. Oedipus obviously showed a lot of anger and when he did he would make mistakes. Jocasta, knowing the truth, raged into her bedroom cursing at Laius, at herself and “pulled her hair out by herself” that shows a lot of anger and right after she killed herself, while Oedipus also anger at the King Laius resorted to killing. They are also deniable. In Oedipus Rex they showed it a lot whenever the truth kept on being closer to be revealed they tried to find ways out of the truth.
Oedipus and Pentheus are both tragic Greek characters who help create their own endings. Through their character's flaws and blindness to what is going on around each of them, the story develops. The only consistent character in both plays who is able to understand past and present dangers is Teiresias, the blind prophet.
Salvatore Giunta is a former United States Army soldier and the first living person to receive the U.S. military’s highest Medal of Honor. He was born January 21, 1985 at Clinton, Iowa and he is 33 years old. He went to High school at John F. Kennedy High School in Rapids, Iowa and went to college at Colorado State University at Fort Collins, Colorado. He got the medal because his comrade was injured and went into enemy fire to pull his comrade to cover and provided medical aid to him and while he was in enemy fire, the enemies were linking up to fire at him and he killed one and one injured and managed to save his comrade and to get security around him while giving him medical aid, which how he got the Medal of Honor.
In terms of the two protagonists' legacy, they generally started in the same situation, both men having to work to achieve success. Oedipus was saved by a shepherd as a newborn when he was sentenced to death by his father solely on the notice that when Oedipus grew up , he would kill his father and bear children with his mother. To escape execution, he was taken to Corinth and was then adopted and raised as the child of the king and queen. Never knowing of the identity of his true parents, he fled when he was told of his unchanging fate and left his home in pursuit to try to escape the path set for him by the gods. Once he felt he was protected from those disdainful occurences, he becomes very prideful of his "triumph" over the gods and loses his trust and loyalty to those he thought he refuted as does his wife. They aren't true believers of the ancient Greek gods and only worshiped when it proves to be most convenient to them not because they truly seek guidance from a higher power. They present sacrifices and pray when they were in times of need, otherwise they would mock the gods and prophecies. "You prophecies of the gods, where are you now? This is the man who Oedipus feared for years, he fled him, not to kill
Achilles and Odysseus are quite different in the way they view combat and take down their enemies. Achilles seems to rely on his physical prowess, often charging in headfirst into battle using surprise and brute force to overpower his opponent whereas Odysseus has a tendency to use his intelligence and cunning nature in both the battlefield and politics as he stealthily plans the demise of his unsuspecting opponent. “Gnashing his teeth with rage, Achilles leaped from his chariot, made for his enemy, and lunged out at him with his sword” (341). Even when faced with a seemingly invincible assailant, Achilles uses his anger and sheer power to overtake Cycnus and impulsively attacks his unblemished skin in the hopes to end his life. It is Achilles’ agile and finesse in battle that has led to many victories for him. Even though the reasoning for his actions are more simplistic and even quite animalistic in some scenarios, it is this godlike strength and vicious temper that makes him the physical embodiment of a vengeful hero and in the Greeks stories he possesses all of the physical traits a hero should exemplify. “For now Odysseus began to boil with envy and thought up a despicable plan to end his rival” (342). Odysseus is quick and decisive in his actions but he relies on his sly nature to defeat and overwhelm his opponent in battle. Odysseus is valued for his wisdom and fair counsel, he has experience in the real world and this shows in the way he manipulates and even plays
The role of hubris, a theme commonly present throughout the works of Sophocles and particularly evident in Oedipus the King and Oedipus at Colonus, not only exalts the Greek nationalism present at the date of composition but dictates the course of the story, evolving as its tragic hero works through his fated anguish. Hubris, defined as exaggerated pride or self-confidence, is the earmark character trait of Oedipus and perhaps Creon. However, it is the abandonment of his sanctimonious nature that distinguishes Oedipus as a true hero. The theme of the evolution and role in the downfall of men by this overly zealous pride may be traced throughout Oedipus the King and Oedipus at Colonus, as it is only by his radical reversal of mind-set that one may deem Oedipus a hero.
"Oedipus the King" is a tragic play showing a shift from the belief of fate to freedom of choice. Therefore, Oedipus the king is a great example of those who run from fate ends up fulfilling their fate
Oedipus is effected by outside influences as much as Medea is, however it is not as exemplified. The outside influences slowly creep into Oedipus’s mindset as the story moves on. Despite how swayed Oedipus might have been by others, he showcases actions influenced only by personal desires in the beginning of the story. Oedipus is one who has a position of power, which may have shaped him to trust his own mind and decisions over others. His mental toughness is broken through however with characters such as Tiresias and the Herdsman. Little details about his past break down the barrier that shields his mind from being influenced by outside sources. As Effie Coughanowr suggests, Oedipus willingly listening to this toxic information serves as, “a single false step and tragedy becomes reality.” (Coughanowr para. 17). This process is a long one where at the end he is seen as broken man that blames himself for the events unfolded. The manner in which he blames himself, “O Kithairon, why did you bring me in? Or once you had