preview

Comparing Gilgamesh, Enkidu, And Mesopotamian

Decent Essays

Nearly every author creates a title for their work that overall reflects the ideas and thoughts they are presenting in their writing. For instance, the article “Buddies in Babylonia: Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and Mesopotamian Homosexulaity”, it’s entirety revolves around the relationship of Gilgamesh and Enkidu and possible ways to view their overall relationship. The article is significant because the author, Jerrold S. Cooper, proposes unpopular ideas previously made by Thorkild Jacobsen about the nature of Gligamesh’s and Enkidu’s relationship. He provides theories not favorable towards his peers or audience because of the homosexuality factor Jacobsen includes. Due to this courage of suggesting behaviors, which during this time was still frowned down upon, that major protagonists of a popular epic would behave in a …show more content…

Furthermore, the article, like many, is trying to obtain an answer for an overarching question, creates an argument that falls on different sides of a spectrum pertaining to the question, including the author’s opinion on which view he sides with, and fabricates an overall conclusion about the debate of the nature of Gilgamesh’s and Enkidu’s relationship. Moreover, the question the author is trying to seek an answer for is what is the general relationship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu, as well as how did Gilgamesh oppress Uruk. Writers and assyriologists deabte the sexulaity between them, how strong their

Get Access