preview

Comparing Kittredge And Abbey

Decent Essays

In a series of tragical events, both authors, Kittredge and Abbey, desperately want to protect nature’s land. However, both essays are written differently to capture the reader’s attention about the two different forces that are ruining the beautiful creation of nature. In the essay “Owning it all”, Kittredge illustrates that his family and him are trying to upgrade the production of agriculture in the Warner Valley, but something goes terribly wrong in their efforts of making that happen. In the essay “The Great American Desert”, Abbey expresses his love for Desert and what people should do to preserve it. Nonetheless,Kittredge and Abbey clarify that nature should be protected against the strong forces that seek to redesign the landscape. …show more content…

His love for the Desert creates his hatred towards all who wish to destroy the natural beauty of it. Abbey claims, “ If you’re thinking of a visit, my natural reaction is like a rattlesnake’s- to warn you off.” (620) A land so pure can’t be touched by a person that doesn’t see the true beauty, so they must stay away. However, the people who wish to restore and love the landscape of the Desert are encourage by Abbey to save and to protect it with all of their hearts. Abbey expresses, “ defenders of Wildlife operate on this theory- those who learn to love what is spare, rough,wild, undeveloped, and unbroken… will resist the strip miners, highway builders, land developers, tree chainer's , and the greedy crew that succeeds in completely califorcinating what still survives of the Great American Desert.” (624) Abbey desperately wants the people to work together to save a landscape that they wish to change in order for people to happily sustain life in. The Great American Desert should be loved for what it is, not for the advantages that can be designed to make it

Get Access