preview

Comparing Louis Armstrong's What Did I Do To Be So, Black And Blue

Better Essays

Louis Armstrong’s recording of “(What Did I Do to Be So) Black and Blue” is a great opportunity for us to learn several important facts about jazz in the 1920’s. The first is probably the most obvious: it provides us with an audio representation of the popular characteristics of jazz. Secondly when compared to the original it allows us to see in what ways Armstrong altered it to make it a suitable vehicle to express not only his ideas but his pains and struggles. Finally by understanding how Armstrong was able to alter the tune from the original we are able compare it to Armstrong’s position on race relations. This allows an opinion to be formed on his involvement in the issue and a decision to be made on the quality of his effectiveness in combating racism and intolerance. …show more content…

Near the beginning of the recording we hear a piano start off with Armstrong coming in soon after playing the melody on his trumpet. One of the first things that stuck out to me about Armstrong’s interpretation is he spends a large portion of his time playing in a minor scale before he begins singing. This gives the song a rather sad and somber sound. While he is singing his band keeps the melody in the same depressing minor scale. About half way through the portion of the song where Armstrong is singing he begins to scat. While Armstrong played as the band’s soloist through the use of his trumpet. His band is able to keep the rhythm and allows a very nice harmony to develop between him and the rest of the

Get Access