In many ways life is all about perspective and how we view things in life like crime, justice, and people. Which is expressed in Susan Glaspell’s texts “Trifles” and “Jury of her Peers”. In these stories you see two different perspectives to one story. While both stories have comparative traits it also had some differences. “Trifle” and “Jury of her Peers” demonstrates how justice is viewed by different point of view and characters.
In “Jury of her Peers” you get to really get inside Mrs.Hale’s thoughts. Mrs. Hale once said “I ought to go over and see Minnie”—she still thought of her as Minnie Foster though for twenty years she has been Mrs.Wright” knowing how she really felt about Mrs. Wright’s name (Jury 1). Trifles didn’t really have enough information about the characters. For Mrs.Hale when she was talking about Mrs.Wright she said “I wish I had come over to see Minnie Foster sometimes” (Trifles 718) just really miss her you wouldn’t know how she really felt about her. In Jury of her Peers he gave a better understanding when you know someone’s thoughts and feelings.
…show more content…
In Trifles county Attorneys once said “ at least we found out the she was not going to quilt it” he was referring to the box with the bird in it which was the motive (Trifles). Mrs. Hale hand pressed up against her coat pocket said “we call it knot it” (Jury 15) both stories keep true to the meeting even though the point of you was different. It didn’t change the story much it just gave us insight on one of the characters mine. Doing that probably gave others a more better understanding of both
“A Jury of Her Peers” and “Trifles” by Susan Glaspell are the same stories, but in different literary formats. These stories are based on the stereotype of women in society in the early 1900s. The roles of women as anything other than homemakers were downgraded. The stories showed how men, of that time, never considered just how hard women worked doing all of the household chores every day. These stories showed women who were treated like children and have no meaning in the workforce or anything else besides serving the men. “A Jury of Her Peers” and “Trifles” share the same plot; however, “Trifles” is a play and “A Jury of Her Peers” is a short story. This makes the same story be told differently because of the genres of literature. A play is represented in a theatrical performance or on film. A short story is a story with a fully developed theme but significantly shorter and less elaborate than a novel. It was easier to read the play rather than read the short story. However, the short story gave more content towards the story Glaspell was telling her readers by showing the point of view of both the men and women, while “Trifles” just explains the story.
Although “A Jury of Her Peers” and “Trifles” are similar in plot, Mustazza’s article, “Generic Translation and Thematic Shift in Susan Glaspell’s ‘Trifles’ and ‘A Jury of Her Peers’” highlights the differences and similarities between the two. Mustazza’s article may help aid readers to understand the differences between Glaspell’s two works and provide understanding as to why Glaspell may have changed the genre and form of the plot. “Trifles” is a dramatic play whereas “A Jury of Her Peers” is prose fiction. While some differences may be seen on the surface, other differences will need to be inspected closely. Mustazza’s article may help one to understand Glaspell’s works by providing analysis and additional perspectives on both “A Jury of her Peers” and “Trifles”.
“A Jury of Her Peers,” is a story about a farmer’s wife who is accused of murdering her husband. Referred to fundamentally as a writer, Glaspell's short fiction went to a great extent unnoticed until 1973 when her short story, "A Jury of Her Peers" was rediscovered. Despite the fact that the creator of forty-three short stories, Glaspell's "A Jury of Her Peers" is her most broadly anthologized bit of short fiction and is dependent upon a real court case Glaspell secured as a news person for the Des Moines Daily. The story, which she acclimates from her one-enactment play Trifles in 1917, has pulled in the consideration of feminist researchers for its medication of sexual orientation related topics. On its surface, "A
Twentieth century society places few stereotypical roles on men and women. The men are not the sole breadwinners, as they once were, and the women are no longer the sole homemakers. The roles are often reversed, or, in the case of both parents working, the old roles are totally inconsequential. Many works of literature deal with gendered roles and their effect on society as a whole or on an individual as a person. "A Jury Of Her Peers" and Trifles, both written by Susan Glaspell, are works of literature that deal with socially gendered roles during the early nineteenth century. The two works are almost exactly alike in that the dialogue from "A Jury Of Her
“She was small and thin and didn’t have a strong voice” (1) and “she didn’t seem like a sheriff’s wife” (1) according to Mrs. Hale. Mrs. Peters didn’t feel that it was her place to be determining who the murderer of Mr. Wright was, but she didn’t have to do it alone because she had Mrs. Hale to accompany her. The women were a substantial part of the investigation because they could find minute details about Minnie Foster that the men wouldn’t understand.
From beginning to end, Susan Glaspell’s 1917 short story “A Jury of Her Peers,” has several repetitive patterns and symbols that help the reader gain a profound understanding of how hard life is for women at the turn-of-the-century, as well as the bonds women share. In the story two women go with their husbands and county attorney to a remote house where Mr. Wright has been killed in his bed with a rope and he suspect is Minnie, his wife. Early in the story, Mrs. Hale sympathizes with Minnie and objects to the way the male investigators are “snoopin’ round and criticizin’ ” her kitchen. In contrast, Mrs. Peters, the Sheriffs wife, shows respect for the law, saying that the men are doing “no more than their duty”. However, by the end of the story Mrs. Peters unites with Mrs. Hale in a conspiracy of silence and concealing evidence. What causes this dramatic transformation?
A comparison and contrast of Trifles, the play, versus, “A Jury of Her Peers,” the short story. Susan Glaspell wrote, Trifles, in 1916, rewriting it in 1917 into the form of a short story, “A Jury of Her Peers.” The play and the short story both start off in a farmhouse in Dickson County, the home of Mr. & Mrs. Wright. In comparison both the play and the story, are very similar with Mr. Hale going to the farmhouse one day thinking things weren’t quite right and returned the next day with the sheriff. Trifles, goes into action on describing the condition that the farmhouse was in when the two townsmen went to call on Mr. Wright, on the other hand, “A Jury of Her Peers,” goes into more action than description. I enjoyed
In the cold December of 1900, an Iowa farmer named John Hossack was found murdered in his bed. Susan Glaspell, a worker for the Des Moines Dailey News at the time, covered the case of his wife Margaret, who was thought to be guilty for his death. In over a dozen newspaper articles, Glaspell discusses the crime, the suspicion, and the eventual decision of Margaret Hossack 's innocence in the murder. Almost fifteen years later, Glaspell would use this case to inspire her one act play Trifles. Names and certain details were changed to fit a more dramatic retelling of the story, but as a whole the story still heavily reflected the Hossack case. The play itself was so successful that Glaspell actually turned it into a short story only a year later and titled that “A Jury of Her Peers.” On the surface, this move seems almost inane, or at least meaningless. What 's the point of forcing a perfectly good play to adapt to a different medium? At worst, it could ruin the entire idea of the story, and at best it would be redundant. However, after reading both the play and short story, the reader can easily pick up on some key differences between them. There are multiple aspects found in “A Jury of Her Peers” that aren 't at all present in Trifles, and the short story is written in such a way that the reader has a very real sense of foreboding that comes from the heavy overtones of loneliness. Glaspell uses the word “lonesome” to describe much of the Wright 's house and lifestyle through
“Trifles” a play written by Susan Glaspell is also a short story named “A Jury of her Peers”. These two forms of writing that are similar in many regards but somewhat different when taken a closer look through. The following with compare and contrast the genres of the story, give a detailed reasoning on why one is better than the other, and a preference on which title is better and alludes more to the writing.
In the early 1900's Susan Glaspell wrote many works, two stand out, the play "Trifles" and the short story "A Jury of Her Peers". Trifles was written in 1920, while "A Jury of Her Peers" was written the following year. Trifles was written in only ten days. The true greatness of these works were not recognized until the 1970's.
Unit 8 Essay If you have ever read both the play Trifles and the short story “A Jury of Her Peers”, both by susan glaspell, then you’ve probably realized that they are the same story, if you haven’t then you aren’t missing much. The story is about a murder case lead by the sheriff, the county attorney, and hale while mrs.hale and mrs.peters are downstairs gathering mrs.wright's, the wife of the victim and the prime suspect, things when they accidentally discover the evidence and the motivation that would convict mrs.wright without a second geuss and decide to hide it from the investigators, their husbands, because they sympathize with her. While “a jury of her peers” and Trifles are the exact same storey written by the same author, the way
Susan Glaspell lived from 1876-1948. She was the cofounder of the first modern American theater company called the Provincetown Players, along with having been a pulitzer prize winning playwright, an actress, a novelist, and a journalist, so she was kind of a jack of all trades, meaning she had many different talents or skills. Glaspell was raised in Iowa, and therefore she set place many of her pieces of writing in the state of Iowa. “Trifles” is a one act play that is based on a murder trial that Glaspell covered as a young reporter. “A Jury of Her Peers” is the short story version of this famous play. There are several similarities and differences between the play “Trifles” and the short story “A Jury of
In the comparison of “Trifles” and “A Jury of Her Peers” are extremely similar to one another in almost every respect. Much of the dialogue is lifted directly from the play and placed into the short story. Additionally, all of the plot points are the same, with some insignificant differences. There are two main differences: the first is the difference between the titles, which is represented in the pieces themselves and the second is the difference in characterization. Susan Glaspell uses death, Mystery, and deception to show the change in both passages.
From a psychological standpoint the environment that a person lives in can have a huge impact on their emotional stability. In the story Mrs.Hale speaks highly of Mrs.Wright and mentions her personality before marriage. Mrs.Hale is an old friend of Minnie who seems to have an insight that no one else has. She implies that Minnie seemed to be much happier before her courtship with Mr.Wright.
Have you ever wondered what people say about you behind your back or what they think of you what you're not there? This book strongly shows what other people think of Minnie Wright and their true opinions come through. Trifles is a play written by Susan Glaspell. It is a murder mystery about who killed John Wright. Towards the end of the story, we come to the conclusion that the murderer was Minnie Wright, John wrights wife. Minnie Wright took her own husband's life because he had killed the one thing that she had loved most, her bird. She thought as if she needed revenge on him for doing what he did, this being said she killed him in the same way that he had killed her beloved bird; a rope around the neck. Susan Glaspell decides to tell this story mainly through the eyes and minds of Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale. While the main plot of the story is about Minnie Wright and her actions, she never appears in the story because well, she doesn't have to. Susan Glaspell chiefly relies upon the characters in the story to give the readers and audience a sense of what type of person Minnie Wright is. Readers can sense her presence through the way she and her house are described. The characters say things like, “here is a nice mess (referring to her house)” (118.) or “she looked queer” (116.) These small statements can help us form an image of what Minnie Wright is like when she is not even present. Minnie Wright’s absence also allows the women to sympathize with her and therefore makes the women feel obligated to keep her secret.