Introduction
According to Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 6-22, “leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization”. This essay will analyze two different leaders, William Wallace from Braveheart and Ahmad ibn Fadlan from The 13th Warrior. After analyzing each leader, this essay will transition to compare the leadership lessons, concepts, perspectives, and styles I observed. Then this essay will suggest how Army leaders can employ the aforementioned perceptions to motivate others to accomplish missions and improve their organizations. Additionally, this essay will recommend specific groups within the Army enterprise that
…show more content…
However, Robert Bruce XVI, XVII, and Scottish Nobles want to settle the war diplomatically for personnel benefits and later betray Wallace. This betrayal leads to Wallace’s capture where he is tortured and publically executed. Prior to his execution, Wallace departs the world with one last word “FREEDOM” ! This word single word coupled with Wallace’s inspiration and passion reunites the Scottish Nobles, Robert Bruce XVII, and the Scottish clans to take up arms as a united front against the English to, later, gain their independence in 1314.
Why Braveheart?
Braveheart and the character William Wallace explain how courage, passion, and inspiration can motivate people to unite against a common threat even when the odds of success are low. Additionally, the story of William Wallace illustrates how leadership traits can have a long lasting effect. William Wallace stays true to his beliefs with such dedication that even under the pressure of torture; he is capable of motivating his fellow Scotsmen to fight for freedom after his death. This is true leadership! Anyone that can inspire a following after death has reached the highest tier of leadership. This is the epitome of a leader. Now this essay will transition to the background of a different type of leader, Ahmad ibn Fadlan from the motion picture, The 13th Warrior.
The 13th Warrior’s Ahmad ibn Fadlan
The
Independent of the Army and country you serve, leadership is always an important subject. There are many civilian books and military manuals talking about leadership. The United States Army divides the subject leadership in three levels. These levels are Direct Leadership, Organizational Leadership, and Strategic Leadership. In this paper, the focus will be only about the first two levels. According with you rank, you will work more in one of these levels. Because of that, most part of time there is not much interaction between higher-level leaders and lower level leaders. Despite the limited interaction between higher level leaders like Brigade commanders with the lower level leader like company commander it’s not affect a satisfactory mission accomplishment.
"Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization" (Mills, 2013). The Army measures its leaders by their attributes and their core leader competencies. Also, a leader must be able to train, coach and mentor their subordinates. Additionally, the Army has three levels of leadership: Direct, Organizational, and Strategic. An effective leader understands and practices these qualities at an operational level.
The creed of the noncommissioned officer is a baseline for all noncommissioned officers Corporal all the way up to Sergeant Major, on how to conduct oneself in the leading of soldiers. It does not outline every single situation you may come into throughout your military career but if you live this creed then you should be set for success. In this paper we are going to take an in depth look into the creed and how you can apply every aspect of it to leadership.
Leadership development in the military is critical to its mission and objectives. Understanding and embracing leadership will foster an agile culture and facilitate attainment of strategic goals. People desire quality leadership to assist with achieving their goals, albeit personal or professional development. Having a clear vision and the motivation to perform at high-levels influences others to work synergistically together to achieve organizational goals. Insomuch, employees value being treated respectfully, fairly, and ethically. Leaders serve people best when they help them develop their own initiative and good judgment, enable them to grow, and help them become better contributors.
Leadership goals should always contain methods of a continuous process of learning through education, training, and individual experiences that help ensure that the message will be communicated in a confident and competent manner when leading troops. Soldiers tend to follow leaders that demonstrate and live the Army values, while displaying their confidence in every decision that affects change. Leaders are not born as organizational or tactical leaders; but grown by their genetic determinism, which is inside and the characteristics they work toward; that mold is which type leader they will become. Not just anyone can lead; you must have the desire to lead, be willing to make the commitment to being a leader, and prepare yourself properly, then you have the desire to become a leader. (Fulton, 1995).
The Army's definition of leadership is “the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization.” An army leader is anyone who inspires and influences people to accomplish their goals. Leaders motivate people both inside and outside the army to help them pursue their goals, focus thinking, and shape decisions for the better of the army. Leadership can be acquired by anyone as long as they have the self-determination to do so. The main principles of leadership in the army are broken down in to the acronym LDRSHIP (loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, personal courage), characteristics the army aims to instilled in each
My leadership philosophy revolves entirely around the Army Values. In every action I take as a leader, I assess whether or not it lines up with the Army Values and the potential impacts. I have had a variety of leadership assignments during my career, all requiring a different leadership approach, spanning from team leader through platoon sergeant. My conflict resolution skills have greatly evolved through my twelve years in the Army, from rudimentary conversations to in depth problem solving. My professional development has had a profound effect on my leadership abilities, from NCOPD’s to mentorship from senior non-commissioned officers (NCO’s).
Leaders are look upon as role models as they guide us with their motivating, influence to accomplish tasks. There are a lot of leadership styles; when leading, it is based on the situation. When I was in the military, I encountered with many different styles of leadership. A leadership that I considered meaningful is a Transformational Leader. The transformational Leader in the military with their inspiring charisma of motivating, influence creates a visualized path that produces energetic characteristics that inhere to new changes, developments, and possibilities.; by demonstrating authority, the Transformational Leader in the military utilizes their power to inspire and motivate people into trusting and following their example; this as
As an army chaplain, I see leadership as a responsibility that must be upheld regardless of the situation. That means I should be able to demonstrate a good example of a true leader. My name is CH (CPT) Idowu, Oyedeji a C4 student at USACHCS, Fort Jackson, SC. I am writing this paper to share my view on what leadership philosophy should look like.
England’s had sent home some men trying to save money and having no confidence in Wallace. The morning of the battle the Earl of Surrey commanded his men to cross the bridge, but he received a letter from Wallace and hoping it was a surrender he ordered his men back across. Wallace had been watching the movements of the English all morning and studying the formation that they used, he ordered his men to cut them off from the rest of the army at the bridge. Some enemy soldiers attempted to escape by swimming, but drowned and the rest were slaughtered by the Scots who showed no mercy. “I’m William Wallace, and the rest of you will be spared. Go back to England and tell them… Scotland is free!” Feeling confident at this point Wallace is not afraid to show his might and boast about himself. After winning so many battles he is ready to start celebrating and riling up his men in order to keep the adrenaline they were feeling. At this point in the war all of Scotland doubted England winning this war and did not tremble in the presence of the enemy anymore. William Wallace led his men to the most significant victory in the war’s history because this served more than defeating the number one military in the world it represented the true character and heart the men
Throughout my life and my military career I have experienced various leadership styles, from civilian employers to military Officers and Non-Commissioned officers alike. Each had their own approach to leadership, some I found to be effective and others I did not. I have attempted to create a leadership philosophy based on a fusion of the leaders I have encountered and my own personal experiences.
The Mel Gibson film, released in 1995 in the United States, shows the struggle of William Wallace and his band of Scottish and Irish brothers going against the tyranny of English rule. Many people make the mistake though when viewing the film. From my own knowledge, I know that the Scottish did not paint their faces blue. That’s as far as my knowledge of the film before viewing goes. What I plan to do in this research essay is to write out the inaccuracies in the film, and address
Leadership, according to the Army doctrine, represents individuals’ ability to influence people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization (“Leadership” FM 6-22). However, the varying characteristics of individuals that the Army attracts may instill this doctrine in many different ways, leading to different representations of leadership. Some individuals choose to lead their subordinate in a stern matter, only displaying matured emotions and a “tough-loving” attitude to guide them in the right direction. Others
The movie Braveheart, directed by Mel Gibson, tells the tale of William Wallace, a Scottish warrior who leads the war against King Edward “Longshanks”, the relentless English ruler who hopes to seize the throne of Scotland for himself. When Wallace was a boy, his family and many other countrymen sacrificed their lives in the fight to liberate Scotland. When Wallace’s wife is brutally murdered by English soldiers, he comes out of hiding and begins his plot to take back Scotland with his countrymen. Wallace makes it his life’s mission to make Scotland independent once and for all and plans to attack the English. Just before the climactic battle, he gives a speech that ultimately inspires his men to fight despite them knowing they could be
Leadership is crucial part of today’s army and leaders play a huge role in the accomplishment of the mission. I believe this is true, because leaders are the guys who are in close contact with the younger soldiers. They are the ones who counsel the soldiers and make them better and make a plan for that soldier to improve and become a better soldier. Leaders play a major role in the accomplishment of the mission, because officers and higher leaders cannot be everywhere at once, so they need a person they can trust to lead the charge and tackle the mission the right way