preview

Comprehending The Calamity And Horrific Wreck Of The City

Decent Essays

Two stories with a historical genre “Horrific Wreck Of The City” by Fred Hewitt and “Comprehending The Calamity” by Emma Burke both tell the story of the great San Francisco earthquake of 1906 in varying perspectives. Emma Burke has a lighter, more positive perspective, shown by this piece of evidence stating, “The all prevailing cheerfulness and helpfulness were encouraging signs of our progress in practicing the golden rule, and humanity’s struggle upward toward the temple of our savior.” (p.4 Comprehending the Calamity.) Fred Hewitt’s opinion is much more pessimistic and hopeless, shown by this evidence: “No story will ever be written that will tell the awfulness of the thirty hours following the terrible earthquake. No pen of the most powerful description the world ever saw could ever place on paper the impression of any one of the hundreds of thousands who felt the mighty tremble.” (p.1 Horrific Wreck Of The City)
Emma Burke’s perspective is obviously more light-hearted, whereas Fred Hewitt sees life more pessimistically. It proves that although the earthquake was a tragedy for all, Emma sees the positives of the event and Fred chooses to see the negatives. The earthquake permanently changed the residents and the city of San Francisco. …show more content…

That few minutes, however, seemed to me a century.” (p.1 Horrific Wreck Of The City), and this shows Emma Burke’s lighter perspective; “Out of this awful experience the automobile became a hero. The railroad and street-car service was destroyed at one blow, and we suddenly appreciated that San Francisco was truly a city of magnificent distances.” This was on page 4 of Comprehending The

Get Access