Corporate Social Responsibility By Porter And Kramer Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a very controversial topic. A question that has been debated for the past few decades is; is it corporately viable to introduce social responsibility as a proposed addition to the work ethic of business organisations. As well as, if adopting the framework of corporate social responsibility would yield positive improvements for those organisations.

From a business ethics stance “corporate social responsibility” (Velazquez, 2007, pp. 23), refers to the social interest an organization manifest in the environment it operates. SoftMagic has not seized opportunities from corporate social responsibility. In the U.S., the use of pro-bono activities to develop networking is fundamental considering that multiple leaders of different firms participate and engage in activities that consequently offer an opportunity to market and increase the awareness of the organization. One more time, the cultural challenge seems to have affected the opportunities for SoftMagic.

Businesses are also seeing the value as “Societies’ growing expectations and pressures that business should assume a more significant responsibility for solving social problems have created a new standard of corporate performance – one that encompasses both moral and financial dimensions. The argument in the above is that values – personal and corporate – not only have intrinsic and social worth but are also a source of economic value for the company.” (XXXXX.) Many businesses look to move beyond traditional philanthropy and create economic and social value through collaborative problem solving with nonprofits. As organizations look to focus on results they’ve expanded their analysis to include the “triple bottom

Corporate social responsibility incorporates environmental, social, and economic dimensions that provide leadership and differentiation opportunities for perceptive organizations. However,

Sustainable development requires companies to meet their objectives while protecting the quality of life of their employees, surrounding community, and the environment. More than 40 years ago, Medtronic 's co-founder Earl Bakken provided the framework for the company 's sustainability strategy by formulating the company 's mission statement that has remained unchanged to the present day. "Medtronic has operated with a clear, compelling mission: To contribute to human welfare through the application of biomedical engineering in the research, design, manufacture, and sale of instruments or appliances that alleviate pain, restore health and extend life" ("Integrated,", 2016, p.4). This visionary mission statement also included a group of ethical guidelines such as the need to strive without reserve for the greatest possible reliability, to recognize the personal worth of employees, and to maintain good citizenship as a company. Those early tenets of corporate responsibility were the foundation of Medtronic 's current sustainability practices.

Corporate social responsibility may also be referred to as "corporate citizenship" and can involve spending finances that do not directly benefit the company but rather advocate positive social and environmental change. The soul in the next economy forum presentation made it evident that achieving corporate social responsibly in a company can reap major benefits in terms of finances, more inspiring workplace and customer satisfaction.

Examine Apple’s current position on the company’s ethical and social responsibilities, and determine whether or not the company has met these responsibilities. Provide two (2) examples that support your position.

Shared Value is a new form of capitalism. The idea of shared value was initially explored by the authors in December 2006 HBR. Shared value is not social responsibility, philanthropy, or even sustainability, but a new way to achieve economic success. In the article Porter & Kramer criticize neoclassical thinking on the trade-off between societal needs and economic success, and the way the concept of ‘externalities’ have shaped corporate and policy strategy. Article says that corporations

Raymond James is a financial service holding company with subsidiaries specializing in investment banking, financial planning, investments, and asset management. The company was founded in 1962, has been public since 1983, and was founded in St. Petersburg, Florida. In June 2016, Raymond James joined the Fortune 500 list for the first time. This paper will address the corporate social responsibility and ethics of this financial institution (Raymond James).

This paper explores the importance of social responsibility within corporations. This paper also explores “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” by Milton Friedman and his stance on social responsibility. Friedman believed that corporations should not waste money on new initiatives if it was just to appease the public, especially if it went above what laws required. Examples are shown how corporations must listen to the customer or it could hurt the profitability of the corporation, with social media being a big tool to press issues. Also discussed are laws that support socially responsible initiatives such as pollution reduction that direct and provide incentives for businesses.

While it is important for a company to make a profit, a business also has a responsibility to help better the community, this is referred to as a company’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Some elements of CSR that corporations focus on are sustainability, community service, and consumer affairs. A company’s CSR is featured on its website, however, some corporations fail at following through with their social and environmental responsibilities. For example, Gazprom, a Russian company focused on exploring new ways to use natural gas, plays a large role in the destruction of many natural environments. Gazprom was founded in 1989 and it is headquartered in Moscow, Russia. Gazprom’s website highlights many charitable acts done by the company, but it does not mention much of what the company has done in terms of the environment. This is because Gazprom is notorious for being environmentally unfriendly. Not only is Gazprom unconcerned with the environment, the company also abuses its strong market power and charges unfair prices to customers.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to the obligation of organisations to behave in ethical and moral ways. It refers to the notion that corporations have a responsibility to the society that sustains them (Wood, et al. 2013).

Cole + Parker is a sock company with a cause: to eliminate poverty in the world. To do this, Cole + Parker partnered with Kiva to create a program called 1 For Many. Through 1 For Many, Cole + Parker donates a portion of the proceeds of every pair of socks sold to charity through Kiva, both domestically and internationally. Kiva is a nonprofit organization that distributes zero interest loans to impoverished entrepreneurs. Cole + Parker has also partnered with Socktober, an annual event that encourages young adults and children to make a positive difference in the world through charity.

There are now several concepts of CSR and its definition, along with the meaning across corporations. In my opinion, and according with our textbook in page 11. CSR is about a particular set of business and strategies that deal with social issues. In addition, we can clearly perceive that CSRs application along corporations has increase in the past decade due to the several local, and international regulations in order to enforce business to act responsible.

‘Corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) means that the firm has wider responsibilities in relation to objectives and people apart from the owners or shareholders (Beal and Goyen 2005). These responsibilities are achieved when the firm adapts all of its practices to ensure that it operates in ways that meet, or exceed, the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. Objectives often associated with CSR include a responsibility to manage natural assets sustainably and not to pollute by chemical discharge, smell, noise, dust or other irritants; fair treatment of employees and ethical attitude towards clients. The other people include employees, customers, suppliers,