preview

Correctional Facilities: A Case Study

Decent Essays

PREA uncovered that staff persons are common perpetrators of inmate sexual victimization (Beck 2013). Regardless of the type of correctional institution, staff persons were more likely to be identified as the offender by the inmate than another inmate. Among the staff persons, correctional officers, were the most frequent individuals reported to have been sexually engaged with inmates, notably, female correctional officers (McDonald & Miller, 2014; Warren et al. 2010). In fact, female staff persons were identified as the offender in over half of the substantiated cases of sexual misconduct, and around a quarter of substantiated cases that involved sexual harassment (Beck 2015). Because of this, reporting sexual victimization inside correctional facilities is made much more difficult, considering staff persons may …show more content…

Notably, female inmates are less likely to report a sexual victimization in the first 24 hours of their admission into a correctional facility when compared to male inmates (Tewksbury and Connor 2014). Other vulnerable inmate populations to staff sexual misconduct are inmates that do not identify as a heterosexual. Non-heterosexuals were twice as likely to be sexually victimized by staff persons than heterosexuals. Specifically, about five percent of prison (5.4%) and jail inmates (4.3%) reported a staff person as their perpetrator of sexual victimization (Beck, 2013). Transgender prison inmates are highly susceptible to staff sexual misconduct (17%), with an even greater rate of transgender jail inmates that have reported sexual misconduct by staff persons (23%) (Beck 2014). Although staff-on-inmate sexual relations are high, such relationships have been described as consensual, if not romantic (Warren et al. 2010). However, from 2007 to 2012, rates of willing sexual relations with staff persons have reduced in prisons and jails (Beck,

Get Access