Corrective Action Level III Case Study

In the beginning of the meeting on September 18th the board addressed the investigative reports of CNA, RN, AP license holders due to specific acts these nurses did during practice that disregarded the regulation of the Nurse Practice Act. For example, David Dane Ryer was a RN and AP license holder. He was under investigation because he was prescribing himself different forms of medicine and was practicing outside of his scope of practice. He had a previous hearing with the board to discuss this issue and ended up walking out before the hearing was concluded. This action then confirmed for the board that he lack self-control and ultimately caused the board to revoke

The patient self-admits that she was not always compliant with her appointments due to changes to her work schedule since the month of December of 2016, but shared this information with her counselor. The patient is requesting to be reassigned to another counselor as she reports of not having a positive rapport with Cherron. Cherron was advised based on the patient complaint that it will be addressed with the Clinical Director based on her request to be

-The participants were not treated respectfully. They were misled and information was withheld. No type of informed consent was given.

On Thursday, April 17, 2017, you are being notified of disciplinary actions that’s being initiated against you for violating Policy 004-001 Code of Conduct, Nelgect of Duty- Failure to take appropriate action on the occasion of a crime scene, disorder, fire or other act or condition deserving attention.

19. Take immediate action if patients have been harmed or abused or are at risk of this.

Zamudio, Human Resources Administrator and acting custodian of personnel records of the Domino Realty Management Company who allowed access, and copies in support of any relevant information pertaining to any injuries, had located a “Work/School Status Report” under the name of the “Talbert Medical Group.” The document had placed the claimant off from work from 2-5-01 through 2-5-01 for pain to the claimants left knee, and yet, according to Ms. Zamudio, the document did not state that a work related injury occurred as there were no other documentation in support of an injury. Furthermore, the witnesses had not cited any job related incidents where the claimants left knee from 2001 had been injured were the alleged 2001 left knee had been irritated or exacerbated in any

A Level A Abuse is defined as an employee who carelessly accesses the EHR or carelessly reveals the EHR. This is not an intentional abuse. Examples of this violation are leaving a computer unattended with PHI open or discussing PHI in the elevator where they could be overheard. A Level B abuse occurs when an employee purposefully views the EHR without permission. Examples of a Level B abuse include looking up other employees’ personal information or looking up a patient to which the employee is not servicing. Lastly a Level C abuse occurs when an employee purposefully views the EHR without permission and reveals the information to another individual such as family or friend. (Randolph, 2010. Pg 2) Level A abuse will result in a verbal warning followed by a formal discussion about patient privacy and securing patient information. A Level B abuse will result in a verbal warning, a retraining day and a 1-day suspension. Upon return to employment, employee will write a formal response on how to avoid future violations. Lastly, a Level C violation will result in a verbal and written warning, a 3-day suspension and retraining upon return to employment. If any violations become continuous or habitual, termination will occur. (Randolph, 2010. Pg

Plaintiff, Chester B. Harris, Jr., raises claims of violations of his Eight Amendment rights relating to his conditions of confinement arising from his confinement at the Maryland Correctional Institution – Jessup (“MCI-J”), he has been transferred to the Jessup Correctional Institution. He raises concerns about the processing of an April 5, 2015 emergency Administrative Remedy (“ARP”) by MCI-J’s ARP Coordinator and complains that the institution refused to issue him a fan to assist him with him with managing his asthma condition because he was unable to pay for it.

Albert, you are being progressed to Step three of the Ascend Corrective Action process for failing to follow specific directions from Chocolate Bayou’s medical staff in regards to your clearance to use a respirator. You were directed by MHBA supervision and the medical department on multiple occasions to resolve the issue but you did not take the appropriate actions in the time you were given. Failure to complete the required tests meant that you were working while knowingly being out of compliance with the site’s Respiratory Protection Program, SP-039. Additionally, your decision to not follow the direction of supervision and complete the required tests is considered insubordination and is unacceptable.

This writer agreed to meet with the patient as she missed group and her scheduled individual session with this writer. The patient apologized to this writer for her absence and then reports about transportation issue. This writer discussed with the patient about her MVA this month on the 18th and the status of obtaining a police report. The patient reports, " I can get the police report by the next appointment. I just have to go to my insurance company that isn't too far from where I live to get a copy of it."

D-The patient was advised that her bottles are in fact suspended due to the incident that occurred on 02/08/2017 of which the patient needs to accountability of taking a second dose of her methadone even though she has taken her methadone at home. The patient admits her accountability of her actions of taking the second dose. The patient then asked about how she can regained her take home bottles of which this writer explained the policy of take home bottles, referring to the reinstatement process. The patient is referred to attend the Take Home Bottle Group on 03/9/2017 to have her bottles reinstated. Then the patient shared that she wrote a grievance letter and still plans to submit it for the Program Director to review. Furthermore, this

A hospital employee did not observe minimum necessary requirements when she left a telephone message with the daughter of a patient that detailed both her medical

Participant was informed that the team is concerned with his ability to remain safe in the community. Participant has been engaging in risky behaviors that endanger him, staff as well as the continuation of his waiver services. Participant has been obtaining marijuana illegally from unknown sources despite his ability to obtain marijuana legally for medicinal purposes.

(S): Writer met with the consumer on Thursday, 11/9/17 at the consumer home. The consumer had just return from the hospital. The writer asks the consumer why he went to the hospital. The consumer states his legs was hurting him and he needed something for pain. The writer discuss with the consumer about scheduling an appointment with his primary care physician for a complete physical and to let his doctor. The writer did discuss with the consumer about going to the hospital vs scheduling an appointment with his primary care doctor. The writer also inform the consumer that he is schedule to follow up with the doctor on Friday, 11/10/17 at 10:00am. The consumer denied any sleep and appetite problems.

To satisfy the disclosure requirements of the Adverse Action Notice, the creditor shall provide an Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) notice that is substantially similar to the format disclosed in section 202.9(b) (1) of Regulation B. The ECOA notice should disclose the federal agency that administers compliance with this law concerning the creditor. The federal agency that administers compliance with respect to North Dakota licensed money brokers is the Federal Trade Commission. The ECOA notice contained in the Licensee's Adverse Action Notice does not reference the Federal Trade Commission as the correct federal authority that administers compliance.