Essay on Courtroom Procedures and the Role of the Prosecution

The prosecution works to get their guilty verdict while the defense tries to help their clients with their verdicts. In court I listen to both sides argue the Innocence/Guilt of the young woman in question wanted on DWI charges. The honorable judge Pauline Hankins presides over the court and waits patiently for all the evidence to be presented. The prosecution and the defense are set on opposite sides of the courtroom while the jury box and the belief are set next to the judge. Judge Pauline Hankins

The Courtroom Work Group Courtroom is essential in the administration of criminal justice through court proceedings. The purpose thereof is to settle conflicts or controversies involving violation of rights between two parties. However, a courtroom work group deviates from its ordinary sense. The latter develops deviant process especially adapted for a criminal proceedings and is performed collectively. It is a system of collective participation of people with specialized functions. It is best

During this semester we were tasked to go out and observe a local court hearing, in class we had gone over the different areas of the American court system from prosecution and defense standpoint all the way to court procedures. Honestly going into the observation, I didn’t know what all to expect, since this was a completely new thing for me. Surprisingly there was a sense of leniency by the judges, I was expecting it to be much stricter, but their inclination to work with the defendants in the

Canadian criminal justice system as it examines the pre-trail process, the courtroom workgroup and the flow of cases. In this report, a critical analysis and observation of the Canadian criminal courts will examine the prosecution of criminal cases, starting with the pre-trail process(behind the scene), the professionals who occupy the courtrooms (“one shot” players also known as the courtroom workgroup) and the procedures for a criminal case (the flow of cases).The observation for this paper took

Part One (15 marks) 1. What does the prosecution need to prove in the courtroom for a person to be convicted of a criminal offence? (2 marks) To convict an individual of a criminal offence, the prosecution must be able to prove to the Jury or Magistrate that the individual is criminally responsible. This is achieved by proving the Mens Rea (guilty mind) and Actus Reus (guilty act) of the accused beyond all reasonable doubt. 2. What are the differences between summary and indictable offences?

tribunals from which the Australian legal system has derived. Yet, from an analysis of these various element one can recognize how this practice reflects the influenced (or lack there of) of many other societal values, religion, gender roles and modernity, on society as a whole. The

Cameras in the Courtroom This fall, Zacarias Moussaoui is scheduled to go to trial for his participation in the airplane bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City. Along with the media frenzy that accompanies a trial of this magnitude, a separate battle is being waged between Courtroom Television Network LLC (Court-TV) and the U.S. Government over the right of the former to televise trial proceedings. The Government of the United States’ opposition is stated in a legal brief dated

to the offender. What is considered to be a courtroom work group? A courtroom work group is a group of participates in a criminal trial. The participants can be divided into two categories: professionals and outsiders. The professionals are the officials that work in the courtroom for a living, which includes judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and court reporters. The professionals are called the courtroom work group.

On July 31, 2017, I remember leaving early from band camp to observe the courtroom in order to write this paper. I pulled up the address of the courtroom on google maps, and I followed the direction to evacuate myself out of the school parking lot. I had made two wrong turns due to my horrible sense of directions, but I was still able to get to my final destination on time. The parking lot was packed at the Greene County Courthouse, therefore I had to park across the street which was still pretty

precedents set forth by the United States government. Over the course of the last several months I have been given the opportunity to sit in and observe the workings and proceedings that take place in The Dutchess County Courthouse. The Judge whose courtroom I observed in over the course my internship was Justice Stephen Greller. Justice Greller was elected to the bench in 1985 and is currently serving his 30th year as a Judge. Needless