preview

Critical Analysis Of Starkie

Better Essays

The adaption of character James Douglas Stark – known as Starkie, a non-fictional war serviceman – becomes a conflict for the omnipresence of nationalism in New Zealand literature of the 1930s. Robin Hyde adopts a realist approach to James Mulgan’s Man Alone; by developing the article ‘Starkie’ Outlaw of N.Z.E.F. into the novel Passport to Hell. Passport to Hell is used to defer from the standard “Kiwi bloke” stereotype, by retelling Starkie’s – a man who was not typically a hero – war experience. Starkie does not fit the stereotypes of either Māori or Pākehā, allowing Hyde to go outside the terrain of New Zealand literature’s nationalism. Therefore, Starkie portrays a reality for “the outsider” in New Zealand society in the 1930s. Hyde – …show more content…

Evidently because Starkie is not a standard example of the Man Alone represented by John Mulgan, Denis Glover and Frank Sargeson. Hyde breaks the Marxist stereotype of a heroic masculine figure in Passport to Hell because Starkie is a character who exemplifies perversity. Hyde provoked conspiracy simply by prevailing a realistic replication of a soldier: the soldier was not the typical heroin executed in literature. This representation is evident in language and Starkie’s interactions, with characters such as Captain Smythe. Diction in this interaction labels Starkie as an “outsider” at first impression. After one glance at Starkie 's rifle, Captain Smythe told him “he was a disgrace to Otago, no soldier, and a bloody pest" (Hyde, 114). Furthermore, Captain Dombey labels Starkie as "the biggest, laziest, rottenest, most troublesome” (Hyde, 141) because of the associations with his skin colour and behaviour. Although Dombey admits Starkie is one of the best soldiers he has ever had in the trenches (Hyde, 141). Hyde is clearly an example of the colonial dilemma in literature, and as a result her work never received the attention it deserved (Bertram, 16). Critics and fellow writers saw Starkie as a formidable rebel against NZ society (Bertram, 16), rather than worthy of appraisal through Hyde’s portrayal. Bertram ultimately exclaims that the final estimate of Hyde’s merits as a writer

Get Access