Cuban Embargo Case Study

Secondly, Cubaneeds to repair its corrupt, failing state-run economy. The reality of thisstruggling economy is that Cuba’s resources are plenty, and its

In 2016 Cuba’s economy was a bit indecisive, the first half of 2016 Cuba’s economy collapsed 0.9% while during the last half of 2016 Cuba’s economy ascended 1% (Chase, 2017). Not only does Cuba have a bit of an indecisive economy their economy also seeks reliability from other countries such as the Soviet Union along with Venezuela. For three decades Cuba stayed dependent on the annual subsidies delivered by the Soviet Union. When all subsidies ceased from the Soviet Union in 1991 Cuba’s economy plummeted. Then history later repeated itself with Venezuela as their economy fell and left Cuba’s economy once again in laboriously hard times (Chase, 2017). But everything soon changed for Cuba’s economy once President Barack Obama opened the doors between the United States and Cuba. As of 2017 Cuba’s economy flipped around with the notable increase of U.S. tourist just from 2016. Cuba’s economy has come an astronomical way in twenty-six years, they found their way making it up to the second most popular place to visit throughout the Caribbean’s (Chase, 2017). With the amount of tourist that come to Cuba provides support and cushion on a good feeling of conducting business in Cuba.

In the article, “Why Do We Still Have an Embargo of Cuba?” Patrick Haney explores the history of the embargo and the different factors which have maintained and tightened its restrictions over the past fifty years. The embargo consists of a ban on trade and commercial activity, a ban on travel, a policy on how Cuban exiles can enter the U.S., and media broadcasting to the island. These once-executive orders now codified into law by the Helms-Burton Act, have become a politically charged topic which wins and loses elections, spawned influential interest groups, and powerful political action committees.

Goods or services of Cuban origin may not be imported into the United States either directly or through third countries” (2001) . According to the Cuba Policy Foundation, the United States loses up to $4.84 billion annually in trade and exports alone (Pepper 2009) . The amount of money being disregarded because of now defunct reasons is radically lacking in logic. A simple repealing of the embargo would bring both the United States and Cuba great economic success.

In 1960 the United States, under President Eisenhower, established a partial embargo on the tiny island nation of Cuba (Rampersand, 402). That partial embargo became a complete embargo under President Kennedy in 1962. The United States established the embargo on Cuba to alter Cuba’s political clime. Looking back through the last 55 years, that goal has not been achieved. It is time to end the embargo on the island nation of Cuba re-establishing economic, scientific and cultural exchanges.

The President is also hoping to reshape Cuban policies. The goal of cutting off Cuba was to hopefully squeeze the dictator from power. Now that the plan has failed, the United States is going about it in a different way. President Obama plans to work on democratic reforms for the people of Cuba. he states that the new policy changes will improve the idea to enable the Cuban population (FACT SHEET: Charting a New Course on Cuba). The added pressure from the US may make the Cuban leaders rethink some of its laws they have inflicted onto the people. The United States would also like to provide Cuban citizens with more updates means of communication. As well as the right to speak and use these means

This article details the history of the Cuban embargo, tracing its evolution as a tool of retaliation for the seizure of American property, as a weapon in the Cold War against the Soviet Union and its Cuban allies, and finally as an instrument of American policy for the promotion of democracy and human rights. The article then examines the actual impact of the embargo on human rights in Cuba today and highlights the contradiction between the embargo’s avowed political purpose and legal rationale-the promotion of human rights-and its actual consequences, which are harmful to human rights generally. The article suggests that, by harming Cubans ' economic, social, educational, cultural, and family rights, the embargo violates basic norms widely

Supporters of the legislation believe that prohibiting foreign investment will quicken Castro’s downfall. (Close Up Foundation) Many debate on the issue of why the U.S. should or shouldn’t keep the ebargo against Cuba. These debates deal with the effects of the Embargo on Cuba’s economy, humanitarian rights and health of the people of Cuba. The embargo today places a ban on subsidiary trade, Licensing, shipping and humanitarian aid. (Close Up Foundation) In 1992, the Cuban Democracy act imposed a ban on subsidiary trade with Cuba. This ban restricted Cuba’s ability to import medicines and medical supplies from third country sources. There have also been corporate buy-outs and mergers between U.S. and European pharmaceutical companies thus adding to the number of companies permitted to do business with Cuba. Under the Cuban Democracy Act, The U.S. Treasury and Commerce Departments are allowed to license individual sales of medicines and medical supplies, supposedly for humanitarian reasons to make up for the embargo’s impact on health care delivery. According to the U.S. corporate executives, the licensing provisions are so tough as to have had the opposite effect. With this statement, it is assumed that there are fewer licenses given out for humanitarian reason therefore favoring the embargo and aiding in the downfall of health in Cuba. Since 1992, the embargo has prohibited ships from loading or unloading cargo in U.S. ports for 180 days after

To better understand and appreciate the embargo in Cuba, one must examine the history behind an unnecessary act. According per the Editorial Board of The New York Times, the concept of the embargo to the United States Congress is to keep the outdated policy upon the Island of Cuba and its people. Gomez and Szabo from USA Today confirms, “President Obama and Cuban President, Raul Castro, have moved to normalize relations with Cuba without any further consideration of removing the Embargo from the Island any time soon” (Gomez and Szabo). It is time for the embargo to come to an end because this outdated policy has separated

President John F. Kennedy signed the Proclamation 3477 of 1962 concerning the embargo of Cuba because of the fear that Communist threats and influences would inspire the American people. Also, much fear stemmed from losing America’s reputation among other countries due to the association with a Communist state. In order for the embargo to be lifted, Cuba must establish free and fair election and grant freedom of the press, respect for human right, establish labor unions, in order to demonstrate and representative democracy. America does not want to look weak among other county and by taking away the embargo, we look weak in the eye of the other super powers. Many presidents tried to lessen the rule associated with the embargo, but Cuba did

USA Today says that there is no reason to believe that a continuation of sanctions on Cuba will hasten the regime's demise or make life better for the Cuban people. This embargo has also harmed the Cuban people and lifting it will improve their lives. This embargo, in reality, has impoverished the Cuban people. Sanctions have harmed the Cuban people without weakening Castro's grip on power and have caused economic harm to the point that it is a human rights violation. This has made it far more expensive for Cuba to produce the food for its citizens. Likewise, lifting the embargo will improve the lives of Cubans. In this situation, engagement is the best way to produce change. Sen. Jeff Flake said it is time for Congress to take the next step of weakening or even better, ending the economic embargo on Cuba. Only congress can do this. Furthermore, the economy will improve in Cuba which will help decrease many of these human rights issues. Tourism will increase in

The U.S. embargo against the exporting or importing of goods to Cuba is a complicated governmental issue that has been in place for over 50 years. The Cold War began when hostile relations existed between the U.S. and Russia; and began when Russia funneled money into Cuba in which the U.S. reacted by dropping the purchase of sugar and Cuba retaliated by claiming oil refineries (Daniels, Radebaugh, & Sullivan, 2015, p.252-253). Recently the U.S. administration has begun lifting parts of the embargo in part as to develop better relations with Cuba and increase Cuba’s weakened economy. The ability for Cuba and entrepreneurs to import and export goods in and out of Cuba will increase their economy and the resident’s standard of living.

The embargo is currently the main source of economic strain facing the island and with some moves towards progress under the Obama administration, Trump’s presidency has yet to take a clear stance on Cuba. The relationship between the nation’s ultimately will define the role of the Church, either by encouraging ongoing reformation or promoting the further isolation of the island. Overall, U.S. and Cuba relations play a crucial role in the internal politics of the island, which directly affect the Catholic

In this situation that Cuba is dealing with the government is attempting to build up and integrate Cuba to

Trade helps in business growth and it helps the economy of the country as the different business enterprises can learn from other businesses’ ideas and would help in the growth of the enterprises with its global competitiveness. The embargo may have been effective in the times of Cold war but in the modern times it is perceived as useless especially for the Cuban-American families and business enterprises that are looking for opportunities in Cuba.