Cursive Writing Is The Importance Of Writing

Through the years, many people have stated that cursive should not be taught in schools. Reading historical documents, personalization, and brain function involves cursive. Cursive writing definitely has a place in our digital society.

In recent years, the rushing tide of typing has overwhelmed the once necessary skill of handwriting. As the days pass by computers and other 21st century electronics are becoming more and more a part human lives. Gone are the constant needs for pen and paper, often times all that is needed for notetaking is a laptop and working fingers. A recent article published by Anne Trubek titled “Handwriting Just Doesn’t Matter” analyzes the importance of handwriting in the computerized world that is lived in today, as well as through a discussion on the teaching of cursive and other handwriting exercises in schools. Using a mix of pathos, logos, and minor amounts of ethos, Trubek is able to comprehensively convince her audience that handwriting is not as important or useful a skill as it used to be.

Taught more than thirty decades ago, cursive writing has a famed and legendary past. It was once a vital element of American education but is now becoming an archaic artefact as technology advancement and the requirement of more regulated tests push it out of the education system. Cursive writing should be scrapped out of the education system for there is no need of wasting time and resources to continue teaching a skill that won’t be beneficial to the students in the near future.

Some people believe that it that cursive is a waste of time and should not be taught. Not all people think that cursive is not used and does not need to be used, but some do. Technology is taking the place of cursive handwriting, with typing. Typing is very easy and legible. Some people assume that e-mailing and text is easier than cursive writing. Most people that mix cursive and regular hand writing tend to write faster. Cursive is not used very much and people may be losing a link from their past.

First of all, if people can write in cursive, they can sign their name on a bill or letter. Tom Zelinka recently said, “Cursive has become a small part of our curriculum therefore most children cannot read it.” That means in fifteen to twenty years these kids will not be able to sign their names. 82% of the children don’t know how to write or read cursive. In the future this gives their boss a reason to fire them.

As you know, most schools are getting rid of cursive all together, but why? Think about when kids get older and they have to sign something, are they going to sign in neat cursive or just write normal? Furthermore, schools should at least teach cursive for fifteen minutes a day. If kids keep progressing in cursive by only fifteen minutes a day, then the teachers should keep going on with it. Then, if other schools see how well it is working, more and more teachers will want to use it more often. If kids can't read cursive, or write their name in cursive, then teachers should still give them the basic steps. When the students get older they're going to say "Cursive is very nice to have around and I like using it every day." But, other critics argue we have computers and we are moving on with society so we don't need cursive. But sill, teachers should teach cursive at least for fifteen minutes, what do they have to

First and foremost, in this article the thesis statement is about how the art of cursive along with the curriculum of the subject is no longer offered to children in school. Also, the evidence that supports this thesis is clearly explained throughout the story about how teachers no longer feel that cursive writing is needed in school, and how technology is a huge factor in schools which pretty much eliminates the need to teach the skill of writing or using cursive penmanship. Furthermore, the author’s style of this article is fictional and states a lot of interesting factors that have been researched, how times have changed. In fact, education just isn’t the same and probably will continue to become more dependent on technology. All in all,

In conclusion I believe that we don’t need cursive in schools. First of all kids are more impressed with technology to spend the time and neatness on cursive. The 20th century skill is not needed in these 21st century skilled classroom, but in these classrooms we just need normal handwriting also if u want your kids to learn cursive u spend your time on it teachers have to teach them normal handwriting enough. Therefore I think that we should not teach cursive in schools and I want you to wright your best without

The article’s, “Is It Time for Cursive to Die?”, written by Lauren Tarshis, and “Why I Keep My Letters”, written by Nina Sankovitch, both agree with different sides when it comes to us humans keeping cursive or not. Despite both articles giving good evidence to support their claim, I have come to the conclusion that the form of writing cursive should be preserved, not forgotten. One reason they cursive should not be forgotten is because of the history that comes from it. For instance, the article states, “Thomas Jefferson penned one of our country’s most famous documents, the Declaration of Independence, in glorious cursive” (Tarshis 19). This piece of evidence shows how some of the most important events in history used cursive, showing how

These people would say that handwriting is passe’, or outdated, and that in the future, everyone will be using word processors to do their writing. Education is important, but schools already have ways to get students to write, that doesn’t involve the repetitive time to practice your writing to make it better. They can enforce these rules of writing without having to practice everyday. For instance, homeschooling parents can be quite confused by the subject of handwriting, so whenever Sam Blumenfeld lectures at a homeschool convention, he always asks if parents think that handwriting should be formally taught. Usually the response is unanimously positive. Mr. Blumenfield, raised this statement for parents to think about,“So you agree that teaching your child to write is an important part of you homeschooling curriculum.”, the next question he raises is if you believe that handwriting should be formally taught, he asks “do you believe that your child should be taught manuscript, also known as “ball and stick” first or cursive first?” Most parents assume that “ball and stick should precede cursive, because that’s the way they were taught in school. ( Sam Blumenfeld, The Benefits of Cursive Writing)

In the article, “Why We Shouldn’t Write Off Cursive” by Bobby George and June George, talks about cursive. The authors argue how cursive should be taught in school and should be considered more valuable. Right now, 45 states has omitted cursive from the required school curricula. I remember when I studied in a private school at India, we had to learn cursive. It was not an optional, it was a must and we were pretty much was graded on how neat/good you write it. Personally, I think cursive is very neat, elegant, and rich looking and I believe it helps you get a good handwriting too.

The reason why is because if we don't progress we degress, just like William S.. The way they use to talk and write is dead to everyone expect those who study it. I'm not saying that they should take cursive teaching out of school, i'm just saying that it wouldn't be missed if they did. The future is now, and the childern of this country should know about how the world is changing and how computers and typing is the future. A few statments the author made about how times are changing, "A signature is no longer needed for many legal documents or receipts. If necessary, an electronic signature is used, which allows documents to be signed and emailed at a click of a

“Needing to both sign and print one’s name to receive a registered letter at the post office, as well signing one’s name to support a candidate for public office. More generally, one’s John Hancock is a tool that can provide security; experts have said that printed letters are easier to forge.” (Steinmetz) To simplify down, you use your signature in day to day life. You will get so use to signing it that it will become a habit. You will be able to do it in a split second. But if you do not know how to do your signature or don’t have the same one throughout your life you will ba scared and it will make you nervous when you could have one down by learning the basics of cursive and making your signature your own. To explain more on the subject, Education Portland explains, “Being comfortable with cursive writing will guarantee students will be confident when writing and signing legal documentation. A cursive signature is most commonly required to endorse legal documents...Writing and signing checks is another reason for learning cursive. Cursive writing has historically been the standard style when writing authorized checks for payment. Students risk being confident and successful when working with basic legal documents if they don’t learn cursive.” (education.cu-portland.edu) To elaborate, you always use your signature to buy items. You buy food and your necessities that you need in life, but you have to sign for them when you are

Although cursive writing seems like a thing of the past, many people debate if it should stay there or not. Writing by hand does have a lot of benifits, not many of therm do people associate writing by hand with. Although it has been proven to be good for our minds, there is still a lot of contreversy over the subject.

Those who believe cursive writing is an overrated tradition, argue that the space it takes in the curriculum can better be used to expose students to new, more helpful material. For instance, Source A claims that the practice of cursive writing in schools is completely replaceable. The article states, “when society adds new skills and new knowledge to the list of things public schools teach, some items have to come off the list to avoid a curriculum that is a mile wide and an inch deep.” As a result, some states have had no problem removing cursive, while others like California are still managing to squeeze it in. Source A also explains that with the technology of today, there may very well be substitutes for a signature such as fingerprint scans. The general