Custody of a child is a very tricky subject because the laws have changed in many states. Judges no longer automatically give custody of a child to his or her mother. Nowadays, judges review several factors and determine the area that would be in the child’s best interest. Both parents will want to have an attorney present to stand by their side in a custody dispute. The judge will review the following factors to determine where the child belongs: Financial Stability Financial stability will not be a main factor in making a custody decision, but it will be one of the areas that the judge will review. He or she will want to ensure that the child has all the essentials such as shelter, food, water and the like. Lifestyle The judge will review
Per Reporter: Stephen (paternal grandfather) has custody of the children. A court order signed by Judge Alphonso (8/19/14) states that Timothy (victim’s father) & mother (unknown) should not have contact with the children. Jill spoke with Harrison County CPS who confirmed that the case has been closed. The mother lives in Indiana and is uninvolved. Timothy is a convicted felon and has been in and out of jail since the children were young. Timothy has returned to Stephen’s home less than a year ago. On the night of 9/28/17, Timothy slapped Brianna because she was smarting off to Stephen. Stephen and Brianna were arguing over homework. Brianna has a red bruise on her left cheek. Underneath Brianna’s left eye it’s red and bruised; however, the
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016, this writer along with Inv. Hopkins and Inv. Lehn of the Metropolitan Police Department Youth And Family Services Division, Missing Person Unit were given this child custody investigation to investigate. .
One benefit of having a lawyer when it comes to petitioning for child support or modification to an existing order is they know which paperwork needs to be filed and have the ability to request documents about the other parties financials. Lawyers can
With fault based divorce in the 1960s, child custody depended primarily on the child’s age. If the child was under seven years old, also known as the ‘tender years,’ the mother would receive physical custody. This was because of the belief at the time that women are good caregivers and it was their job to take care of the children at home. However, if the children were older, custody would be granted to the parent of the same sex. Sometimes judges would also award custody of children dependent on martial or sexual conduct of the spouses. When custody was awarded in this way, the presiding judge could be more focused on the rights of the parents than what is best for the child in that situation. Either way, it was quite noticeable that child custody was based on the judge and their opinion, which could change from case to case.
Child relocation laws and best practices in the United States vary from state to state. Child custody in Arizona is defined as “legal decision-making” for the child and visitation is known as “parenting time”. The term “child custody” is no longer used, effective January 1, 2013. The court can order one or both parties to have legal decision-making authority for the child(ren) and consider many factors, falling under A.R.S. 25-403. In the case of joint legal decision-making authority, both parents must work together to make decisions regarding the child. If one parent is granted sole legal decision-making authority, they make decisions about the child without consenting the other parent as long as it
5. How a divorce and child custody investigator in Austin can resolve your family problems?
Today if you ask the average person the question of who gets custody in custody arrangements, most people would answer that it is the mother who in most cases is granted custody, this is just simply not true. In order to understand custody arrangements, we must look back at our history and work our way forward. The rules concerning child custody arrangements date all the way to beginning of the nation. In the early period of the colonial period and New Republic, the household was ruled over by the head of the household, which in most cases was the father.
Custody cases can be hard on everyone involved and it is often seen that courts tend to favor the mother in custody cases. The truth is that custody is decided by what is in the best interest of your child or children. This can involve a lot of factors and employment should only be a small part of the deciding factors. Having a job or not having a job should not be the deciding factor in any custody judgement, however you may find that whether you can or can not financially care for your children will be a factor.
In conclusion, this paper has addressed the controversial issue that face the court when it comes to the controversy on the time-honored question should/or should not the court allow children to testify in child custody cases. Also, to sum it up that the BICS has a lot of weak points that needs to be changed when it comes to child custody. However, there are mores states that have their own option about children testifying in custody cases.
Reynolds (2004) stated that five out of every six custodial parents are mothers, and he goes on to say that one out of three of those custodial parents receives a full payment averaging about five thousand dollars. Often times a judge makes the decision to grant custody to the mother based on the idea that a mother has a closer relationship with the child because of giving birth. However, it is important to remember as Smith (2003) reminds us that fathers love their children just as much as mothers, and to call them non-custodial parents is offensive. Often times when parents get divorced the mother has been a stay at home mom and the father has been the primary bread winner so, when a mom is awarded custody as you can imagine it becomes very difficult for her to balance the children and the one (or more) jobs that she has to work in order to support the family.
Children in custody battles often feel confused and voiceless, I would know because I have been one of them, stuck between two moms. I work in child care as a nanny, babysitter, and within the last year, I began my work as a Companion or Supervisor for children in custody battles. I accompany them to visitations with the parent who did not receive custody because of previous neglect and act as a Supervisor as recognized by the court. These children are not heard in the custody cases when their parents fight for guardianship and many go through this traumatic experience alone. My empathy runs deep because I struggled through this first hand as a child when my two mothers, once in a domestic partnership, separated due to my adopted mom’s struggles with alcoholism.
Parents tend to think of child custody in terms of their right to spend time with, and make decisions for, their children, but in another respect the courts consider it an obligation. Your children have a right to expect support from both of their parents, in whatever form that may take, which is why the parent who does not receive full custody is usually required to pay child support.
The reason I chose the case that I did is multi-fold. One, I have been dealing with the State of Michigan courts as recently as today concerning family law since my divorce in 2002. Michigan is a state that gives very little deference to a child’s wish of who they want to live with (regardless of age or maturity) regardless of how equal the living arrangements are (e.g. healthy environment, good schools etc.). In fact it was only relatively recently that Michigan finally changed its laws and assumed a 50/50 split in custody so long as it is in the best interest of the child.
Divorce is a sticky situation and comes with great amounts of pain and trials. But when children are involved, the situation becomes a whole lot stickier. In these circumstances, child custody policies were created in order to negotiate the child’s legal status for the care, authority and livelihood of the children to either parent awarded by a court (Child Custody and Parent Time, 2015). Distribution of tangible items in the home, money, and most importantly children are determined and assessed by professionals in Utah State Courts. There are different types of custody that courts can grant to both the mother in father that can be addressed in different situations. Sole custody is when one parent is awarded full custody of their child,
When parents become divorced there are many decisions that they must come to an agreement upon. "How will are possessions be divided?" and "What will happen to the children?" are often the most asked questions when divorce occurs. Custody is almost always the largest battle when husband and wife become divorced. Custody includes all duties a parent owes a child including, food, shelter, protection discipline, education, and even a child's religious beliefs (Martin 32). Often, a judge must make custody decisions for the parents. There are several types of custody, but the most common are sole custody, joint legal custody, and joint physical custody.