preview

DDT In Sub-Saharan Africa

Good Essays

Zhen Liang Sun
Professor Rideout
English 1020-041
28 July 2016
DDT, Worth It or Not
There has been a large issue as to whether we agree using DDT for controlling malaria or oppose using DDT because of the impact of environmental pollution in sub-Saharan Africa. Different people hold different attitudes towards this controversial issue. Carson believed that using chemicals is harmful to the environment and bringing the opposite effect. Other people believe that DDT has already saved a huge number of people’s lives, it is useful to control malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. Before presenting my point of view, I intend to explore both sides of the argument.
People in favor of the former opinion always provide the following evidence. Carson advocates …show more content…

Malaria kills a huge number of people in sub-Saharan Africa every year, and DDT has some effective sustenance against the mosquitoes spreading the disease. “One in 20 African children die of malaria, and many of those who survive are brain-damaged. During the rainy season in some parts of Africa, entire villages of people lie in bed, shivering with fever, too weak to stand or eat” (Rosenberg).Authorities consider the benefits of DDT in preventing malaria are well worth the contamination. In poor areas of the tropic, they don’t have enough money to use a healthier and more effective technique to prevent malaria, DDT is a better choice as an inexpensive pesticide. Meanwhile, high temperatures in tropic areas lend to chemical pesticides break down easily. Even though they know that these chemicals are harmful to the environment, DDT had already saved a huge number of children’s lives in sub-Saharan Africa. For example, Madagascar banned using DDT and had an outbreak of malaria, leading to the death of more than 12,000 people. For them, getting rid of the threatening malaria is more important than protecting the environment. If they lose their lives who can protect their environment. Until now, some poor countries in Africa still continue using chemical pesticides against …show more content…

Some supporters believe that the shortcomings on chemical pesticides should be thrown away for a more effective way to oppose malaria. Some people consider this method would bring the same problems and would not solve the disease. As times goes by, some farmers discover a negative side of DDT. Mosquitoes are not only increasing quickly, but they become more resistant to the chemicals pesticides, which means that people use a lot of DDT and more time to kill them so it is a permanent effect on the environment and humans. Moreover, our body don’t have the ability to break down the toxic substance that is stored in our body all the time. These toxic substances will do a lot of harm to pregnant women and infants in sub-Saharan Africa. “According to epidemiological studies on humans, exposure to DDT could also lead to premature birth and low birth weight, and may even harm a mother’s ability to breast feed. Women who are exposed to the chemical in their first trimester of pregnancy may have babies with retarded psychomotor development” (Ovuorie). Meanwhile, DDT effects birds badly, which diminish the birds’ eggshells such as brown pelicans and bald eagles. The number of bird decrease dramatically due to using

Get Access