Dante Servin Research Paper

FACTS: Gary Duncan engaged in a conversation between two of his cousins and four other boys who were white due to the prevention of a racial incident. Duncan intended to break the conversation off and had his cousins separate from the other boys. It was alleged that Duncan had slapped one of the white boys, Herman Landry, on his elbow just before entering his vehicle. Duncan was convicted of simple battery in the Twenty-fifth Judicial District Court of Louisiana. Duncan had requested a jury trial but was denied due to Louisiana Law only granting jury trials in cases involving capital punishment or “imprisonment at hard labor.” Although simple battery in Louisiana is punishable by up to two years in prison and up

The facts were not at all clear to the Police Officers or the attorneys who will soon face this case. The players involved where many, but to name just a few: William M. Kunstler, a very popular and well-liked lawyer, he represented James Richardson. The Author of the book was the prosecutor in this case; he was young and unprepared to becoming an assistant district attorney for this case. But I do have to add that the work he did performed was excellent, but again William Kunstler he was a well-seasoned attorney.

Although the court agreed that the officer did not have probable cause, the gun possession was

The semi truck driver, Juan Gonzales* was never charged, as Mr. Girroir was driving home to his family on Thanksgivings eve Mr. Gonzales made a turn thinking he could make it

The prosecution, representing the U.S. Government, calls the first witness. A N.I.S. (Naval Investigative Service) officer states that he received a letter from the victim, Private First Class William T Santiago, requesting a transfer off the base. In exchange, the victim would provide evidence of an illegal shooting over the fence line. The offender of the fence line shooting was Lance Cpl. Dawson. The prosecution was trying to show motive by their line of questioning. The defense makes the point

Your honor, I respectfully request that you find the defendant, Jamie Hayes, guilty of voluntary manslaughter. As you can see from our witness’s testimony, we have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that Jamie Hayes, is indeed guilty of manslaughter. Our first witness, Lou Williams, head of campus security, explained the specific details of every incident involving the track team and campus security. Alongside this, Lou Williams also told us that the security department was well trained and prepared for any incident that was to occur. All security officers were licensed to carry firearms and to use them if necessary. Furthermore, she stated that they hired Lee Valdez based off his respectable credentials and that he was a great officer to work with. During Valdez’s time, recent events involving police brutality raised some serious concerns amongst many of the students at CCU. Since then, the students have held two rallies on excessive use of force by law enforcement, and with this, the security department has noticed a change in the students’ attitudes towards authority. In response to this, Lou Williams conducted monthly training meetings with her staff on how to deescalate tense situations. Despite what defense may say otherwise, Campus Security did have a procedure that was followed on the night of the incident on May 15, 2014.

impairment or injury”, 2) “serious bodily injury” or 3) “bodily injury to a child” (2017). Offense levels range from state jail felony up to first degree felony (2017). When Injury to a Child is determined to be a state jail felony offense, the jail term ranges from 180 days up to two years (2017); however, if it

“... the Humboldt County District Attorney’s Office presented all the information available, including testimony by seventeen witnesses with distinct accounts of key events,” the office said in a statement. “In addition, all available physical evidence was presented to the Court. The hearing proceeded while the investigation is ongoing because a person has the right to a preliminary hearing within 10 days of arraignment.”

Terry Vickorie, Steven Rogers, and Andru Crowley will face many charges for their involvement in the homicide of William Boyd, and their actions leading up to and after the event. The charges the boys face will be determined by what the prosecution believes they can prove to a jury, and the wording of the statutes. The prosecution will likely bring the charges of stalking, bribery, conspiracy to burglary, burglary, felony murder, and felony kidnapping. For the events leading up to William’s death. The prosecution will have many options of charges to press in the death of William. This will depend on statute wording, and abundance of evidence toward each charge.

Dallas Winston also pulled a pistol on the pursuing police officers. That is a death threat, police officers see the worst side of people every day. To have someone point a gun at you means that they want to kill you. So the Police have a choice, kill or be killed. At the end of the day, people are people, we want to make it home safe every night.

         This case was one of the few that ended in a positive conviction of the officer.  In many cases, it ends after the first trial and the officer gets off with out even going to jail.  This police officer committed a terrible crime and his job was to protect the public, not kill them.  It's impossible for us to

Following Worthy’s investigation, on July 2008 two more federal charges were brought against Kilpatrick. Both of the new felony charges for assaulting or interfering with an officer of the law. Both counts are for obstruction of justice, there were also another charge of assault as well, which Kilpatrick would eventually plead no contest to the assault charge. The incident occurred when two officers went to serve a subpoena to a close friend of Kilpatrick. Based off the officer who was shoved by Mr. Kilpatrick, they were grabbed him by his shoulders and threw him, knocking him into another officer while trying to hand a subpoena to Bobby Ferguson.

my conclusion: the officer said he gave Sandra Bland a lawful order to get out of her car, but the officer did not have any lawful reason to order Bland out of her car. Thus, the officer

The accused, Erin Lee MacDonald was charged for handling a firearm in a careless manner without taking erasable precautions for the safety of others and for possessing a loaded restricted firearm without having an authorization license stating he could do so. The case was on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia and was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2014. The judgment of McLachlin C.J. and LeBel, Fish and Abella JJ. was delivered by LeBel J.

The cop was aware that his reason for killing two men was unacceptable but he did it anyway