Upon its emergence, ‘Good Bye, Lenin!’ was characterised by a so-called renaissance of GDR Heimat feeling, as presented by Daphne Berdahl, writing on late 1990s trend of recuperation and reproduction of Ostalgic GDR products, which she argues revealed complex relations between personal histories, disadvantage, dispossession and the betrayal of promises. Whereas these complexities are echoed in the film, one could argue that it has a more expanded function as well as could be perceived in a globally charged context. ‘Good Bye, Lenin!’ is set in the East Germany, around the time of the fall of Berlin Wall and circles around the Kerner family, comprising of a twenty-year-old Alex, his older sister Ariane and their mother Christiana. One night, …show more content…
Similarly, Ludewig has argued that the “existence in limbo, the feeling of having lost the past without having found one’s place in the present, has led to people taking refugee in a utopia, a mental construct that exists outside of facts”. Hence, ‘Good Bye, Lenin!’ could be perceived as functioning as an imagined reality enabled by mediascapes, a globalisation paradigm introduced by Arjun Appadurai. Appadurai has argued that the “[t]he image, the imagined, the imaginary – these are all terms that direct us to something critical and new in global cultural processes: the imagination as a social practice”, a form of negotiation between individual sites of agency and globally defined areas of opportunity. Mediascapes, together with ethnoscapes, technoscapes, financescapes and ideoscapes, form building blocks for these imagined worlds, in which the reality is evident as fluidity rather than concreteness, since media generates a pictorial dimension, in which one can live in a world one strives to live in. The key characteristic of a mediascape is that it offers, especially in television and film forms, a selection of images producing narratives, profoundly blending the realm of commodities and the …show more content…
Secondly, the production of an imaginary Heimat is embedded with the harmonious family affiliations that produce an imagined community, which, in turn, has the capacity to resist. Certain critics referred to this merging of aspects of social and political reality as well as personal escapes of that reality, as a “psychotic substitution of actual experiences with a dark conspirational vision: the creation of a delusionary homeland”. However, it could be argued that it is the master narrative of unified German Heimat produced by the state, which is embedded with the delusional quality, as it fails to acknowledge the multiplicity of experiences. ‘Good Bye, Lenin!’, on the other hand, openly underlines the ability that mediascapes have to produce an array of realities, merging imaginary aspects with the truth. This is especially evident in a series of fake news reports, devised by Alex and his friend, as responses to his mother being accidently exposed to Western innovations. For instance, a giant ‘Coca-Cola’ advert that Alex’s mother sees through her bedroom window, is described as an outcome of a recent discovery that the brand was, in fact, a Socialist invention. Similarly, when Christiana catches a glimpse of the abundance of Western cars in the traffic,
Although Gerda was destined to grow up, it was the brutal conditions and pain she suffered under Hitler’s reign that forced her to mature beyond her years. In fact, she has also developed as a woman as the years of World War II progressed, and gained a massive supply of wisdom. Having to cope with the loss of nearly everyone she loved by herself, Gerda gained much independence. Experiencing times where death seemed to be her only liberation, it was her great optimism and her family’s infamous quote “Be strong” that kept her going. Weissmann embodies perseverance and her desire to live radiates off of her and inspires others to live. Gerda Klein’s memoir is written so delicately to the point where the reader doesn’t focus on the horrors forced
It is hard to imagine what living life in constant fear of death and arrest would be like, knowing that any slight slip in actions or speech could result in the end of one’s life as they knew it. Eugenia Ginzburg is an active communist member who finds herself on the wrong side of this situation. Arrested for over exaggerated claims of being a trotskyist terrorist, she is immediately thrust into a spiral of events that will dramatically change her, her ideals, and the entire state of communism. However, while in the prisons and labor camps it is interesting to note how her perceptions of life and reality change, including her affiliation to the state. This naturally begs the question; How do Ginzburg's perceptions of Communism and the Stalinist regime change throughout
Funder’s use of symbolism in order to explore themes relevant to her own personal struggle with finding comfort and security within the former GDR is a concept central to Stasiland. The author’s more abstract use of darkness enables Funder to draw parallels between her own difficulty living in the former GDR and those who endured the true terror of the Stasi Regime, particularly in the retelling of Miriam Weber’s attempted escape to West Berlin. ‘It was dark...’ on the Eastern side of the Wall, and ‘...in the west the neon shone.’ West Berlin is painted as a safe haven, away from the dangerous and frightening ‘dark’ GDR.
Todd Gitlin is a notable author born in New York City. He attended the University of California at Berkeley, where he received a PhD in sociology and was heavily involved in the Students for a Democratic Society group. Gitlin is now a professor at New York University where he teaches culture, journalism, and sociology. Gitlin’s selection, Supersaturation, or, The Media Torrent and Disposable Feeling, comes from his book Media Unlimited: How the Torrent of Images and Sounds Overwhelms Our Lives (2001). In this selection, Gitlin describes how private lives and domestic spaces have evolved from the seventeenth-century until now. He feels as though our once
Goodbye Lenin! (2003) appropriates the individual as bound to his environment, threaded, through strong cultural codes, to his neighbour. Regardless of the system, communist or capitalist, and though our goals may deviate, we are all pursuing happiness and comfort, the tools used to attain this products of that society. That said, it is immediately legible whereabouts Becker wishes us to view the East German state as wholly negative, and he does this through several key scenes.
Komar and Melamid’s painting titled “Lenin Lived, Lenin Lives, Lenin Will Live! (1982)” shows the embalmed body of Vladimir Lenin lying at the top of the podium in the Lenin Mausoleum in Moscow and a kneeling female figure in mourning in the lower right corner. The painting bears resemblances to the Soviet and French Revolutionary and Christian models (Hillings 49). Lenin’s corpse and the other-worldly female figure show an artificial disconnect that resembles how various Soviet regimes used
From Stalin’s Cult of Personality to Khrushchev’s period of De-Stalinization, the nation of the Soviet Union was in endless disarray of what to regard as true in the sense of a socialist direction. The short story, This is Moscow Speaking, written by Yuli Daniel (Nikolai Arzhak) represents the ideology that the citizens of the USSR were constantly living in fear of the alternations of their nation’s political policies. Even more, the novella gives an explanation for the people’s desire to conform to the principles around them.
Set at the end of the Cold War in East Germany, the movie Goodbye Lenin is the story of a young man, Alex, trying to protect his mother, Christiane, who just spent the last eight months in a coma. Christiane is a personification of the values and ideology of socialism. She carries them out in her interactions with society, and is very hopeful towards the success of the regime. During her absence, the fall of the Berlin Wall and of the German Democratic Republic leads to a radical and turbulent change in society: the fall of socialism and the triumph of capitalism. Because of the shocking effect of such information and the danger of another heart attack, Alex creates for Christiane an ideological form of socialism. Fundamental themes in the movie are the difference between ideal and reality of socialism, as well as the positive and negative aspects of the transition to free market capitalism. Such themes are carried out through a juxtaposition of an ideal society and its reality in the form of a constructed reality of socialism. This idealized version of socialism served as an oasis from the chaotic transition from a problematic socialist regime to free market capitalism.
“The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception” by Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer is a pivotal article in history that changed the way in which many communications scholars viewed media. Both authors were members of the Frankfurt School, a school of thought which looked further into Karl Marx’s theories about capitalism and the issues of mass production. Published in 1944, Adorno and Horkheimer revealed their beliefs that the media, much like the economy, is becoming mass produced, and is therefore turning people in society into media-consuming robots. Industrialization created work lives for people in which they would work on only one part of a larger machine. As a result, they felt less involved in the completion of the project as a whole, and therefore felt less pride in their jobs and their lives in general. Instead, these people turned to media and pop culture so that they would feel more fulfillment within their lives. Adorno and Horkheimer believed that these people had a reduced capacity for original thought because media is now force feeding them the ideas of what they can think and feel. This essay will prove that although Adorno and Horkeimer’s points were justified through the eyes of authors George Lipsitz, Lev Manovich, and Susan J. Douglas, there are still exceptions to their theories that they do not account for.
Within the film, Good Bye, Lenin!, the transition from a Socialist society to a post-Socialist nation can be seen in the film’s utilization of symbolism. Symbolism used within the film can be understood as reflective of the actual lives of German citizens, and from this imagery, the transition to post-Socialism can be analyzed as bittersweet. Good Bye, Lenin! portrayed the conditioning of Socialist citizens by politicians, the citizens’ reliance on governmental support, the westernization of East Germany, and the gendered roles of men and women within society. Within the film’s symbolic imagery, these portrayals further resonate the bittersweet transition of Germany’s society and the reality of its citizens. It is from these various depictions
“War is peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength.” George Orwell’s 1984 depicts a dystopian state which is controlled by a totalitarian government. The government uses propaganda as a cornerstone of exploiting people and remaining in power. Techniques such as doublethink, slogans, newspeak and laws are cunningly used by the regime in order to maintain authority. Every action of an individual is controlled by the state through the use of fear thus restricting an individual from using their own intellect in order to make effective decisions. The propaganda evident in 1984 can be compared to the propaganda found in the film Goodbye Lenin.
The Russian Revolution is a widely studied and seemingly well understood time in modern, European history, boasting a vast wealth of texts and information from those of the likes of Robert Service, Simon Sebag Montefiore, Allan Bullock, Robert Conquest and Jonathan Reed, to name a few, but none is so widely sourced and so heavily relied upon than that of the account of Leon Trotsky, his book “History of the Russian Revolution” a somewhat firsthand account of the events leading up to the formation of the Soviet Union. There is no doubt that Trotsky’s book, among others, has played a pivotal role in shaping our understanding of the events of The Revolution; but have his personal predilections altered how he portrayed such paramount
The widely acclaimed film, Good Bye, Lenin! (2003), is a tragicomedy set in the immediate period preceding and succeeding the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Directed and co-written by Wolfgang Becker, the film was a critical success. It attracted 6 million viewers in Germany alone, was sold to more than 60 countries and won multiple domestic as well as international film awards including six from the European Film Academy (IMDb). Two prominent and intersecting narratives underline Becker’s cinematic representation of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Firstly (and more conspicuously), the film relates a wry and often unspoken tale of German reunification through an Eastern perspective. Concurrently, a second narrative traces a private story of familial deception, tragedy and ultimately, kinship. Examining Good Bye, Lenin! under the lens of two German cultural phenomenons - Ostalgia and Mauer im Kopf - this essay contends that the film’s political significance exists primarily in its nuanced understanding and unique presentation of Germany’s journey towards national reunification. In this endeavor, Becker’s film succeeds in both reflecting and invigorating a wave of greater cultural as well as political dialogue within Germany. As such, one may view the film as a valuable socio-political instrument contributing to the country’s ongoing process of national reconciliation.
Also, in order to define a certain phenomenon based on theory, I will hypothesize how extent the thought and theory are connected. For instance, globalization affects the way of perception of the world, which Tsagarousianou describes that “The global system of sovereign states has been familiar both structurally and symbolically in the daily acts of imagination through which space and human identity are construed. (Tsagarousianou, 2007, p175). I will analyze how the interviewer perceives media as part of their daily life in their mind.
Mediascapes refer both to the distribution of the electronic capabilities to produce and disseminate information (newspapers, magazines, television stations and film production studios), which are now available to a growing number of private and public interests throughout the world, and to the images of the world created by these media. These images of the world involve many complicated inflections, depending on their mode (documentary or entertainment), their hardware (electronic or pre-electronic), their audiences (local, national or transnational) and the interests of those who own and control them. What is most important about these mediascapes is that they provide (especially in their television film and cassette forms) large and complex repertoires of images, narratives and ethnoscapes to viewers throughout the