What do you think goes thru the mind of a killer, like Jonathan Nobles from Steve Earl’s “A Death in Texas”, who brutally murder innocent people? Killers like Nobles disregard the gift of human life and violate people’s right to live. The death penalty is a necessary element in the judicial system to not only prevent the offender and others from committing a similar crime again, and to relieve the never ending flow of criminals that fill the prisons, but also most importantly to punish the heinousness of the crime and to provide closure to the victim’s loved ones. One need for the death penalty is to prevent the killer or others from committing murder again. Someone might think twice before committing murder if they knew they …show more content…
By having the space and ability to rehabilitate more inmates, that can be productive in society again, maybe we can stem the tide of repeat offenders.
The most pertinent use for the death penalty is to punish the criminal for their crime and attempt to bring closure to the victim’s loved ones. The viciousness of committing capital murder demands extreme punishment should be taken against the offender. Imagine you and your family are brutally murdered but you could still see what happens afterwards. Now imagine the person that committed the heinous crime only received life in prison and was going to live a long time. How would you feel knowing that while you and your family no longer have the right live anymore the murder is going to have a chance to live their life and be taken care of for the rest their days? Some may find this unfair and the victims don’t have a chance to voice their opinion on the sentencing. Often the only way for the victim’s family, friends, and loved ones to receive closure is with the death of one who committed the brutal crime. They can receive closure knowing the offender is dead and no longer able to harm them or others. Also knowing the killer felt the same thing as the victims can provide some closure or at least make it easier to move on
Edward I. Koch uses his essay “The Death Penalty: Can It Ever Be Justified?” to defend capital punishment. He believes that justice for murderous crimes is essential for the success of the nation. The possibility of error is of no concern to Koch and if would-be murderers can be deterred from committing these heinous crimes, he feels the value of human life will be boosted and murder rates will consequently plummet (475-479). Koch makes a valiant effort to express these views, yet research contradicts his claims and a real look at his idea of justice must be considered in order to create a fair nation for all.
Ever since the dawn of man’s search for justice, the death penalty, has been a consequence for particularly heinous crimes. Over the years society has debated whether the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. People who oppose of the death penalty view supporters as gun-slinging "rednecks" who live in the backwoods of America. Likewise, supporters view those who oppose the death penalty as uptight "suits" who live in mansions and believes that every person, no matter their crime, deserves to live. Those who oppose the death penalty argue that life in prison is a preferable solution to the death penalty. The supporters of the death penalty argue that Hammurabi’s code, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life, is an
The death penalty is engaged to show governmental power and is used against people to show others that you will not have the right to live if commit such a terrible crime. People have been killed by the death penalty for many reasons such as treason, terrorism, espionage and murder. Having the death penalty gives closure to the families victim, justice is better served, and deters criminals from committing crimes. Think about if you were close to a victim who traumatized or even killed by a master criminal. You would want the same to be served to the harsh owt law who endangered your
Some benefits of the death penalty can be an effective deterrent for crime, a way to reduce the number of criminals, and deter people from committing extreme crimes. It can help to keep that person from committing other horrible crimes and provide comfort for the family of the victim. Unfortunately some negatives are that it can also target people with a low income, be misused, and take the lives of an innocent person. Once a person is charged you better hope they definitely committed that exact crime because there’s no way to take back that
Have you ever wondered during any point of your life about the severity or how influential the death penalty is on criminals and the U.S citizens? If you haven’t never given it consideration before, you will after this argumentative essay. The death penalty is a government practice where a person is sentenced to death by a state for a crime they have committed and even dates back to the 1600s. Out of fifty states, thirty-two still have the death penalty in effect. Even with the death penalty still occurring in these states, not too many states sentence criminals to it anymore. However, Texas is one of the states that still rely on the punishment heavily which then corrupts their state spending for beneficial things such as emergencies, roads, or economy. Although the death penalty might seem like a good idea to end a person’s life, I for one, however, believe that the death penalty is outdated for the 21st Century and should be abolished.
(1) Most murders happen in the passion of the moment, however, serial killers, burglars, gang members, and others who plan their crime in advance can and do think of the possibilities. Many criminals don’t carry weapons while committing crimes, for example, to keep from killing, as Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania recalls:
After reading about the death penalty in our criminal justice book , it was interesting to find out that the death penalty was brought over to America by the English settlers. I do understand that the death penalty is a controversial topic that will never end. In the next few paragraphs, I will discuss the death penalty and my opinion on this topic.
In most states, a person convicted of first degree murder has the potential to be given the death penalty. Capital punishment is a subject that can be counted upon to stir emotion and controversy into any conversation or argument. The very concept provokes a profusion of valid questions and opinions. Today's daily world of
One of the largest motivators for the death penalty is the punishment of a severe crime or crimes the reason the prison system exists is the prevention of a crime something that the prison system is not always capable of ensuring. For example 67 percent of convicted offenders released are rearrested within 3 years add to that the magnitude of the crimes being that 41 percent of the re-offenses are violent crimes and another 39 percent are drug related crimes. The data makes a compelling argument for the permanent expungement of the perpetrators from society it calls for a death penalty.
It is one of the most important things to many people and certainly comes into question when discussing the death penalty. Capital punishment can have a significant negative effect on the family of the person being executed because they too are losing a family member. The opposing side will counter that the family of the injured party will get closure knowing that the criminal is dead and can no longer hurt anyone. In contrast, spending life in prison can also bring closure to the grieving family because, in this instance as well, they won’t be able to harm an innocent person. Additionally, killing the criminal doesn’t solve the problem nor bring back the victim, so very little if anything will change. The family can get closure knowing that the convict will be degrading away for life in prison. Therefore, there really is no need to administer the death
Capital punishment and the death penalty are government authorized retributions by death. The rulings are known as death sentences, and crimes that can lead to death penalties are referred to as capital offences or crimes for example first degree murder or treason. The most used technique of death penalty is hanging. The performances are carried out in public places, and the people who carry it out combined it with a process of torture. In this paper, I will focus on the issues against death penalties, its role in the criminal justice system, and the differing side of the issue.
The death penalty is a necessary punishment in this time of cold-blood killers that do not deserve to live because it can save taxpayers money, help victims families justification, and deters criminals from other crimes being committed.
The lister has set out to analyze both sides of the civil argument over the morals and legitimateness of the death penalty, particularly in the US, and picks neither side in any of the accompanying sections. They are not introduced in any important request.
A teenage girl, Paula Cooper, from Gary, Indiana, and her three friends wanted some money to play video games. For them, Ruth Pelke, a 78-year-old Bible teacher, was an easy target. By taking Bible lessons from her, the four teens gained entry to her house. Then, with a 12-inch butcher knife, Paula Cooper stabbed the elderly lady 33 times to death. It is not a wonder that few had little sympathy for Paula Cooper, who was sentenced to death in 1986. Throughout ages, the death penalty has been used to punish criminals for severe crimes. All countries should enforce the use of death penalty for severe crimes since it serves to deter crime rates, acknowledges the value of human life, administers justice and gives closure to
Death punishment, gives closure to the people involved with the tragedy. It helps to the overpopulation problem in the prison system, instead keeping an intern 25 years or more. Finally, people who received the death punishment usually are not able to be rehabilitated. If these people have the opportunity they will kill, rape, and torture again. There are many factors that make murders incapable to