Thomas Friedman observed that no two nations with a McDonald's franchise had ever gone to war with one another. Developing nations do not want to risk the loss of multi-national companies who venture into their markets and include them in their global supply chain. Although there are no givens and war is still possible, but economic globalization acts as a powerful preventive. Although this theory seems as such a foolproof concept there is still an issue at hand concerning who manufactures the products in the middle of the chain of supply. Workers are forced to work long hours under horrible conditions for nearly nothing. They live in cramped 3-bedroom hostels with twenty other people. With all these conditions that the workers have to …show more content…
These corporations make large sums of money despite the fact that the workers are the one’s suffering trying to produce their products under poor working conditions, for long hours, with small pay, while being denied their basic rights. Under a long list of violators Apple has been found guilty of such. Charles Duhigg and David Barboza’s article “In China, Human costs are built into an iPad” shines light on the terrible working and living conditions Foxconn’s workers must undergo each day. From a personal point of view, I believe the blame for the harsh working conditions outside of the US can be equally shared between three separate parties; consumers, US companies, and foreign manufactures. Consumers want the most innovative thing that can be produced. They want to have something that makes life more efficient and the only way that can happen is if someone continues to think of these ideas. US companies sit in their offices, and in meetings for hours and hours a day brainstorming on how to make the newest version of their products bigger, better, and more competitive. For example an iPad; Apple needs to continue producing their iPads with more advanced features, like one with better resolution, a front and back camera, one that is thinner, one that is smaller, one that can fold up and fit in your pocket. Multinational companies such as Apple are very sneaky with their work, they only change one aspect of their devices at a time to increase the longevity of the
American buyers should force their foreign suppliers to pay their workers more money as well as work them a fewer amount of hours. Instead of
On 04/22/16, Ken'Dell came to school with a red scratch mark on his face. The reporter stated that the child isnt complaining of pain or needs any medical treatment. According to the reporter, Ken'Dell told her the scratch on his face came from running into a pole. According to the reporter, the child told he ran into a pole while chasing his baby brother, that chased a cat. The reporter stated that the children were not properly supervised and was outside the home alone. Ms. Pendleton stated there are not any prior concerns and the child's basic needs are being met. Ms. Pendelton stated her primary concern is the proper supervision.
In the third world countries such as Vietnam, China, South Korea and Taiwan, we are provided with an example of cheap labour. These corporations could now achieve the benefit of the United States consumer market8, while keeping their costs extremely low in offshore production. The working conditions in the United States were poor for centuries, often little to nothing was done unless a tragedy occurred to influence worker rights by the public. This was the issue during the Industrial Revolution and in the late 20th century. In the United states, improvements have been made and these conditions have disappeared, with the privilege in some agricultural areas. Companies from the United States have moved a considerable amount of their factories
The primary economic winner in recent times from McDonald’s globalisation process has been East Asia, as in 1975 when McDonald’s opened it first restaurant in Hong Kong, it brought with it a high standard of professional service and the first restaurant to continually offer a clean eating environment, which customers came to demand from all restaurants later. Another winner of the globalisation process, are the third world workers employed by transnational corporations. Although the western world sees sweatshops as immoral and unethical, the labourers who work in these places are often being paid a higher wage than most of their fellow citizens. This means through the economic globalisation process and cross border corporations, workers in developing countries have the opportunities to survive and beat the poverty cycle.
Apple, the giant electronic device company in the US, also makes a massive profit from the cheap labor in China. As same as Walmart, the workers for Apple Company have to work overtime because the hourly wage can’t support their families, and they have to work in the environment full of dust and metal. Foxcom is a company of Apple in China, which manages the processing of Apple products. In the plant producing IPhone 5c, a 15 years-old boy is killed because of the unclean condition, and he was too tired. The average working hour is more than 60 a week, so many workers have to sleep overnight at the workplace, and some even work both day shift and night shift to feed their families. Although the workers of Apple Company are suffering, the profit of this company is still increasing. Last year, the avenue of Apple was 42.1 billion dollars, and net profit was 4.8 billion dollars. The cost to make an IPhone is about 200 dollars, but it is sold by 700 to 900 dollars each. Workers in China get 1.5 dollars an hour, so they get 268 dollars a month, and that is three times less than the price of a phone. Apple gains the huge profit, but they haven’t given any benefit to these workers. China is just one of many countries suffer in selfish of the giant companies. Côte d’Ivoire is a country in Africa, and it is famous with production of cocoa, and it’s also where the
In the modern world we live in, globalization creates inequality despite its significant role in our economy. Globalization is the integration among nations of political views, products, ideas, and cultures. Utilizing modern technologies, international trade are made possible among large corporations and individuals around the world. With these advanced technologies, these corporations are able to build factories around the world, expand their production, and supply the world populous with more consumer goods. Unfortunately, these pros come with a cost. Despite the amazing contributions that globalization has brought, these corporations have resorted into using cheap labor and regulate unequal rights for workers in the global scale.
These conditions provide some power and control for these multinational corporations over their workers. The Chinese workers are powerless against the influence of the corporate executives. They are able to “ultimately set the pace of production as well as the wages of the workers” (“Working Conditions”). Sine corporations may deny any connection to these labor abuses in China. However, with these powers, these corporations cannot shy away from the fact that they did have some degree of responsibility for the conditions of Chinese workers.
In 2006, the Mail on Sunday alleged that sweatshop conditions existed in factories in China, where the contract manufacturer Foxconn, operate the factories that produce the iPod. The article stated that one iPod factory, as an example, employed over 200,000 workers who lived and worked in the factory, and regularly performed more than 60 hours of labor per week. The article also reported that workers made around US$100 per month and were required to live on the premises and pay for rent and food from the company. Living expenses—a requirement of keeping the job—typically required that employees spend a little over half of their earnings. The article also said that workers were given buckets to wash their clothes in.
Their current and future existence hinges on how well they can juggle a double edged knife. Manufactures are bargaining chip between consumers and the government. Consumers expect it now and cheap. While government directs a safe workplace, decent wage, and benefits to allow employee to earn a decent living. No mathematical equation will provide an equal solution for all parties. The demands of the government and consumers impose complications for the manufactures. Thus, manufacture options are extremely limited. The best course of action available to manufactures is relocating part of production overseas. Some have chosen to move the entire company. Toyota, a prominent auto maker reproduces certain parts at their overseas plant. They have determined it is more cost effective to pay the import fee than make the parts in the United States. Currently, the U.S. imports exceed our exports. Truly, the U.S. is not operating under a positive economic strategy. A quick glance at the various items American consumers own will show majority of products are made in China, Indonesia, Japan, and countless third world countries. Supply and demand is alive and well in America. Over the past 60 years the made in the U.S.A. logo is less evident. Americans remain focused on availability and cost of owning the latest gadget. They fail to care where the products are made. Consumers
Generally, globalism has been attributed to better worldwide communication, advanced technological development, and a higher international standard of living, and rightfully so. However, with all these new worldwide advantages comes a new type of human exploitation. Many companies, specifically American ones, have been quick to take advantage of the cheap and dangerous labor available in most of the undeveloped world. Countries who are working through their period of Industrialization are being siphoned off and used to maintain America’s economy, while their developing country reaps no reward from the low paying, dehumanizing jobs that American companies offer their low class workers. This type of inhumane job outsourcing can only be compared
Companies such as Apple, Dell, HP, IBM, and Sony outsource labor and hardware manufacturing to a company called Foxconn Technology Group. Foxconn Technology Group is a multinational business anchored in Shenzhen, China. Some of the typical hardware being manufactured are, motherboards, chipsets, smartphones, tablets, and laptops. The majority of the factories are in China, three in Europe, one in India, and four in Mexico. Currently there are contracts to expand and build a new factory in Brazil. I believe that there are many ethical problems related to this example; first, the general idea of outsourcing mass amounts of labor, and secondly the mistreatment of
1. From Tab #1, what is the meaning of the Unneeded Investment? Why is having fewer “days” of inventory an advantage over Compaq?
REF OF GROUP MEMBERS’: TABLE 1 : 5 C’s SITUATION ANALYSIS Factors Dell Company: Resources 1.4 Licensing, Distribution channel, Supply • Intellectual property, Human resources, Patent, Competences Brand acuity1 chain management 24 25 Techno structure • Just-in-Time; CRM; Engineer R&D, Acquisition
Globalization continues to grow at a rapid rate forcing more interaction between countries, with so much involvement in a global market skepticism is bound to rise. The concept of vulnerability is expressed through the causative effects of globalization as multidimensional disasters whether environmental, cultural, technological, economical, political, ideological, etc. The focused attention on the relationships given in a social situation constitutes the rationality of the behavior. Based on everything learned throughout the quarter, I concluded that one of the primary contributors to the vulnerability in a globalized world was due to social domination in the economic market. What I mean when I say this is that social domination was the empowering affects of large corporations. This continues to grow as an issue because the drastic effects on other countries involved. Geographically these industries begin to populate other territories in other vulnerable countries in order to operate. With this comes the many issues of environmental harm, exploiting natural resources and exhausting, heavy cultural/ideological influence on other demographics. From two different perspectives that can negatively affect these smaller countries. Once operations begin infrastructures will need to be capable of operations; following expected commerce which demands importing and exportation that requires modes of transportation such as airports or sea ports. This can and will become problematic for
How many technological devices do you use daily? In this day and age, the list would probably include smart phones, laptop computers, tablets, or more, but do you know where these devices were made? Even if your device was assembled locally, there is a good chance that the parts inside come from a collaboration of companies working together from all over the globe that are part of the global supply chain. For the last few decades, more and more companies rely on outsourcing, to produce their products and to provide services. Which, in effect, has globalized our world and depends on countries being able to collaborate and work together to provide the products and services demanded by the customers at the end of the supply chain. As an example, journalist and author Thomas L. Friedman describes the global collaboration that took place in the production of a Dell laptop he had ordered, in his article, “The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention,” from his book The World is Flat. Friedman speaks of the ‘flattening’ of the world, which is an international equalization of business competition, facilitated by increasing interconnectedness. He proposes that because of this flattening of the globe, the countries involved in the supply chains are hesitant to be involved in war because they do not want to risk losing their place in the supply chain and the higher standard of living that comes with it. These countries are