preview

Delta Air Lines (a): the Low-Cost Carrier Threat

Decent Essays

Delta Air Lines (A): The Low-Cost Carrier Threat
Problem: Delta Airlines didn’t have a comprehensive response to low-cost carriers across functions.
Option: Delta should launch its own low-cost carrier.
Problems: Nearly all major airlines had done this unsuccessfully, proved unsustainable over time, never had a high-cost carrier transformed into a low-cost carrier.
Since deregulation (1978) the average return on investment below cost of capital for the 5 largest carriers. Due to 9/11 the demand for air travel declined sharply.
Airline’s profitability hinged on the fraction of its flown seats occupied by passengers- load factor
• Costs measured in cost per available seat mile (CASM) – cost required to fly one seat one mile
…show more content…

JetBlue
Low CASM, high load factor
Humanity, good amenities (in-flight entertainment system)
Low costs: simple fare structure
New technology: Internet (60% of seats were booked on-line), paperless operation, computerized, Reservation operation (not using call center)
Strong brand: “Cheap chic” image
Employees are all nonunion, high “esprit de corps”, flexible employee package,

2. Why have all of the low-cost subsidiaries of full-service airlines, including Delta Express, failed?
The main reason for the low-cost subsidiaries’ failure is the airlines’ corporate strategy. By launching a LCC as a unit inside the same corporate structure (e.g., single scheduling and pricing centre for United Airlines’ and Shuttle’s low–cost flights), traditional airlines limited the LCC’s flexibility and independence. By building a low-cost carrier on top of a traditional carrier cost-structure, the parent company was also tempted to think low-cost when setting ticket prices, but not trying (or being able) to reduce traditionally high costs: the airline had now two unsustainable business models instead of one!
Secondly, such a strategy requires an extremely complex cultural change. Airlines are traditionally

Get Access