Devereux Glenholme Case Summary

When we spoke last week we discussed the school district’s concerns regarding child find under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 for students who have an individual health plan (“IHP”).

Background checks were completed for Daniel Abbott and Elizabeth Ruyle. Daniel Abbott was negative for CANTS (12/8/2015). FBI (12/8/2015) and Illinois State Police (12/8/2015) were positive. Mr. Abbot was arrested on 08/05/2001 for driving under the influence of alochol. He was charged with a DUI. He plead guilty, paid the fines, and attended six classes. Mr. Abbott was clear with records for his fostercare license under his name. Mr. Abbot no longer drinks. Inquiries into the National Sex Offender Registry (1/22/2016) and the Illinois Sex Offender Registry on (1/21/2015) revealed no offenses for Daniel Abbot. Elizabeth Ruyle was negative for CANTS (12/8/2015). FBI (12/8/2015) and Illinois State Police (12/3/2015) were positive. Ms. Ruyle

On April 25, 2016, I followed up with Stephanie Sharnweber (mother). She reported that her son has been committed to Dominion Hospital where he is currently undergoing psychiatric testing and is not accessible for a ripp assessment. On April 26, 2016, I spoke to Ms. Priscilla Harp of the Court Services Unit who

Federal court case, David DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Big Walnut Local School District Board of Education, et al., Defendants, involves the maltreatment of a disabled child in the state of Ohio. Participants of this case include plaintiffs’, David and Mary Doe (parents of disabled child), John Doe (disabled child) and defendant Big Walnut School District Board of Education (school board). John Doe has been diagnosed with Cognitive disability as a result he is required to have an Individualized Education Plan ("IEP"). Due to ongoing “below average general intellectual functioning, self-direction, and communication deficits” listed within his IEP from May 24, 2007, John was placed in a Resource Room at Big Walnut Middle School to assist in the advancement of his education. There were reports of inappropriate behavior involving John Doe’s interactions and encounters with other students, which Principal House was made aware of by the facilitators. John Doe expressed his constant torment of victimization with

This case was brought forth to the court system under of the laws that were determined under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) as an appeal to the decision of the district court was well as the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The parents of Zachary Deal believed that the school system failed to provide their son with a Free and Appropriate Education (FAPE) as well as not placing Zachary in the least restrictive environment (LRE) as outlined as a requirement within the IDEA Act as well as in an IEP. Further, the Deal’s were requesting financial reimbursement for Zachary’s private school tuition as well as any other education related services that were provided and funded by the parents outside of the school. While the ALJ found the school liable for part of the reimbursement, they also found that the school was in violation of IDEA because of substantive violations during the process of identifying assistance for Zachary Deal. Both the Hamilton County Board of Education and the Deal family appealed the ALJ’s findings which escalated the court case to a

The school will continue to offer any comparable services from the incoming transfer IEP through an interim IEP providing FAPE and the school will complete the evaluations within the 60-day timeframe. After the team completes the evaluations, a team meeting will be held to determine if the student meets the criteria for special education in the State of Idaho. If they continue to qualify, the team would write and implement a new IEP (State of Idaho Sufficiency Review: Transfers from Out of District and Out of State Guidance Document. 2014. p.1-2). It is important to remember that the parent/adult student must be involved/consulted in this process and that a written notice must be completed with the Sufficiency Review results (Idaho Special Education Manual 2016, Chapter 5, p.

During our negotiation with D.G. Barnhouse (DGB), we intend to utilize an integrative bargaining strategy with management. Before coming to this conclusion, we weighed the advantages and disadvantages of a distributive approach, however, we eventually decided to take an integrative and predominantly interest based stance versus a position based stance in our negotiations after assessing internal and external environmental factors. In addition, we settled on this strategy because we ultimately believe that management and the union share at the very least, one fundamental common interest, which is the firm’s financial stability. That being said, even with our plans to use integrative bargaining, we still plan to negotiate assertively to achieve

Sumter County School District 17 is a public school district in South Carolina. T.H. is a student who qualifies for services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Sumter County School is appealing the decision of the lower district court, who found that the school district did not provide TH with a Free Appropriate Public Education. The school is also appealing the district court’s findings, which verified that T.H’.s current placement at home was appropriate. The school argues that the home placement of T.H. was not the Least Restrictive Environment. The school district’s appeal further contends that they at least in part provided a FAPE for T.H. because he was making some educational gains during the time in question even though the school was not providing the amount of service indicated in T.H.’s Individualized Education Plan. The school also asserts that they remedied internal problems and were able to provide the full range of time and services require through T.H.’s IEP.

On 6/24/2017, at 1740 hours, at the Durango Jail (3225 W. Gibson Lane, Phoenix, AZ 85009) Inmate Bennett BK# T375249 was escorted to the Durango Medical Clinic by Officer Smith B3168 for odd behavior out of Durango 4. Inmate Bennett was seen by RN Gyle AT061 and ordered to Maricopa Integrated Health System (MIHS) located at (2601 E. Roosevelt Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85008) by PA Fischer CS245 to rule out psychosis.

ICM met with Mr. Hurley at New Start one located at 3653 N. 15th street t to assess Mr. Hurley’s needs and to complete paperwork for his activation. Mr. Hurley is a 41 year old Caucasian male who self- reports using Heroin since the age of 25. Mr. Hurley denied a history of other substance use; however, his referral noted a history of Cocaine and Marijuana use. Mr. Hurley is currently residing at New Start 1 and has been there for approximately two weeks. He stepped down from a level 3B care at Miracles in Progress. Mr. Hurley shared with ICM that his longest period of abstinence was for 8 years, but he could not recall details of his sobriety. During, this encounter Mr. Hurley was very talkative and engaged well with ICM. Mr. Hurley stated that he was hospitalized in the past on multiple occasions

R/s about one week ago, Thomas was admitted to Palmetto Low Country Behavioral Health Center. R/s Thomas has primary custody of Megan (13). R/s Thomas has history of drug abuse. R/s Thomas doesn’t have a place to stay.

On 04/13/2017 Tashia Couts was sent home on suspension due to threats made via Social Media to Amaiya Weston in which case she stated that she felt unsafe and did not even want to take a luch or walk to her car. John Hammann walked Amaiya to her car and watched as she left safely. Amaiya also felt unsafe due to a comment Shacora Wiggins made as she was escorted out on a suspension as well by John Hammann.

1) Police across Ontario, Canada are looking for a David Maracle, a serial offender who escaped from a correctional facility in Kingston, Ontario on January 22, 2017. David sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl at gunpoint in 1997, served time and was released in 2015 to 24 hour supervised correctional center. He was only allowed out if staff received a detailed itinerary of a planned trip. On that Sunday, around 8 pm, staff realized David was missing and alerted the authorities (Edminston, 2017).

On July15, 2016 Douglas Runnion completed his high school education at the Abraxas center. Since his last court appearance Douglas has made little to no progress in treatment. Douglas continues to remain steady in his consistent negative behaviors. Therefore, the Abraxas treatment team is asking that Douglas be discharged from the program. Abraxas recommends that Douglas continues to be afforded extensive sex offender specific treatment, family therapy, and anger management.

I agree that the establishment should of have at least considered Patrick's suggestion in having his own transportation to fulfill the requirements for this position. Although, he failed the vision examination because of his condition, his rights were violated under the ADA. Patrick's is qualified and considered to be protected under