READING RESPONSE PAPER #2
In this paper, I plan to discuss two topics from DeYoung and Gilbert’s book: the starting point of the church’s mission and the “end of the end of the story”. Even though, the subject of the Mission of the Church is profoundly deep and has enormous applications, it seems that both the essence of the mission (its starting point), and the ultimate goal of the mission, (its ending point), are extremely vital to the entire paradigm of the church’s mission.
The authors argue that “one of the biggest missteps in much of the newer mission literature is an assumption that whatever God is doing in the world, this too is our task” (41). However, if the “missio Dei (mission of God) is ultimately to restore shalom and renew
…show more content…
Similar to the first disciples, before doing the tasks that we feel God calls us to do, we need to have the reassurance of the good news in our heart. Simply speaking, we need to become aware that the mission was born in the heart of God out of his love for all people, and it can be perceived solely through experiencing God. Even though our mission is not identical to the mission of God, it begins with it. The missio Dei is revealed from the Father through the ministry of Jesus and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit. Only then, as we enter into deeper relationship with Trinity, we can fully comprehend the wholeness and intensity of missio Dei. After all, we as a church are not doing our own assignment but rather joining Christ in his mission, which is possible through partnering with the Spirit. As the authors indicate, “when sent on a mission, we are sent to do something – and not everything, either, but rather we are given a particular assignment” (19). The awareness about this particular assignment comes through the personal knowledge of God and intimate relationship with him. We are to carry on Jesus’s mission but definitely not in the same way he carried it out. Our mission is an extension of what the Father already started in Jesus as he sends us out the same way as he was sent by the Father. Thus, the Great Commission …show more content…
Otherwise, the good things that we do might not have the eternal, ultimate impact. Assuredly, God is at work to renew all things, and, ultimately to bring the universal shalom through new creation at the end of time. The “renewal of all thing” goes along with providing for the ultimate human flourishing that includes peace and prosperity, security, and abundance. I appreciate how N. T. Wright, a contemporary Anglican theologian, portrays human flourishing in terms of four aspects of life, which are: justice, spirituality, relationship, and beauty (Wright 2006, 138). Certainly, the church’s mission is to address these primary needs of humanity – all converging on the human flourishing that flows out of the love of God. However, as DeYoung and Gilbert discuss at the end of the book, “there is something better than the good life, something better, that is to say, than human flourishing” (246). We can easily miss what the end of the story is all about. The mission starts in the loving heart of God and it ends with God. “Human flourishing is not human flourishing without worship in spirit and truth” (246), without God being in the center. The biblical story starts with God and humanity; and, it ends with God and humanity – with God being in the center of all of
James 1:5 tells us, “If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you. It is God’s will that we have a purposeful life that is ordained by Him. It is His desire that our lives are in line with His will for us. Christopher Wright (2010) in his book the “The Mission of God’s People” tells us he reveals God’s purpose and goal for his whole creation. He stated that “Paul called it the “whole will plan of God” Acts 20-27; Ephesians 1:9-10.” “Part of that divine mission, God has called into existence is a people who will participate with God in the accomplishment of that mission.” “All of our mission comes from the prior mission of God and it is broad in scope. Mission arises from the heart of God himself, and is communicated from his heart to ours. It is the global outreach of the global people of a global God” (pg.
Referring again to the Latin term Missio Dei, translates to “a sending God” or “God’s mission” that everything originates in God, including missions. We must realize that His character and attributes are who He is, and God’s mission everything He does to establish His kingdom on earth.9 The nature of God seem to be centered around 1) His law and righteousness and 2) His mercy and salvation through Jesus. His desire is to see people from every race and nation come to Him; this is where the church is challenged to help make this happen through missions.
In the world of the Church there must be a mission to be captured. If it is not to go and spread the Gospel, what is the point of the church? The Missio Dei stands as a guide for the church. Describing the Church’s mission through Missio Dei requires a look at not only the Abrahamic Covenant and relationship between the church and missions, but the role of missions within the church as whole.
This book calls the church to rethink and modify its practices, by providing a middle path between the emerging church and the conservative that aims to benefit all. There are major shift happening in the Western Church that has people talking. The problem is that churches fail to follow a mission-centered approach. Chester and Timmis have found that in order to refocus the churches
In addition, the pope highlighted the importance of missionary work to the life of the Church. He said it is not enough to just “try to keep one’s parish or diocese going” because being a Christian means
Gorman begins by developing the central idea of the “mission die” in the Pauline letters by having us consider what it would do to our understanding to consider the mission of God in what Paul wrote in those letters. In this chapter he defines for the rest of the book what he means by “mission Dei.” Gorman sums up Paul’s understanding as, “God is on a mission to to liberate humanity…from the powers of sin and death” (Gorman 24). In the rest of chapter one Gorman develops this by looking at Paul, salvation and our participation in God’s mission.
Lesslie Newbigin’s book, The Open Secret, brings to the forefront the missionary emphasis of the Christian church. The emphasis can be found in the beginning, when Newbigin introduces his subject. The introduction emphasizes the connection between the mission of God and the mission of the Church, discusses the historical background of missions, and the need for a new attitude toward other world religions. With this new attitude comes an emphasis on dialogue, which promotes interaction between Christianity and other religions. However, these interactions can lead to questions of authority.
Whereas, in understanding the nature of mission as given to us in the New and Old Testament, it's reveal the that God is the author of mission is by laying much emphasis on what God rather than man does this reveal in the term Missio Dei, God's mission. This in term let it be known that it is insufficient to proclaim that the Church of God has a mission in the world. Rather, the God of mission has a Church in the world. In reading Introducing World Missions, one would come to understand that " mission theology must be at the core of theology - within the character and action of God Himself." This being a part of God show the need of God to be a part of His creation with Him being the source by which the characterizing of the worlds is seen in Him. When we look at the work of Jesus then we see the root cause of mission and the mean by which on
On Tuesday, November 26, I critically listened to a sermon at The Word of Faith Christian Church delivered by Pastor Julius Stephens. It was a regular Tuesday bible study with about eight people. Pastor Stephens 's topic for the day was everybody has a purpose. In this paper, I will critique Pastor Stephens 's sermon based on its introduction, body, delivery, conclusion and finally my overall reaction to his speech. The reason for the speaker 's sermon was to ensure his audience realizes their worth.
The most important aspect of the missions is to contextualization. Before the author talks about this issue, this book provides a definition of the two words: leadership and missionary. First of all, the author defines the term ‘leadership’ as three different roles: 1) the one who set the direction; 2) shares a purpose of the missions; and 3) cultivated a culture by leading them. Second, the author’s definition of missions is, “a missionary is anyone, from any country, who leaves home in order to proclaim the gospel, usually in another culture” (13). Furthermore, according to the book, the missions is not merely proclaiming the good news of Jesus to all over the world, but it should move to church planting, discipleship, biblical education, leadership development, and participate with the world vision, because that is how you fulfill God’s ultimate purpose.
“Mission is rooted in the nature of God” (Van Rheenan p. 14). My personal theology of mission starts here. Mission is an attribute of God and this story is told throughout the Bible. First, He created the heavens and the earth. Next, the pinnacle of God’s creation was man, made in His image and likeness. Just as Psalm 19:1 says, “The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork” and according to Van Rheenen God, “is the spring that gives forth living water—the source of mission” (p. 14). God continued that mission in the New Testament when God became flesh and the mission of our Lord started to proceed to humans through Jesus (Heb. 1:1-2). In the book, Let Nations Be Glad, John Piper wrote “Missions exists
Gonzalez, Justo L. The Story of Christianity, Volume I: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation. Second Edi. New York, NY: HarperCollins, 2010.
Milbank views the Church as a perfect community which was the only reason for the incarnation of Christ and which later repeats the destiny of Christ - sacrificing itself in order to eliminate human’s sin and return back to original peaceful creation but at the same time presenting itself as God’s gift in Christ. Such vision of the Church gives people chance to think about it as an interpretation of all events, thus making Church the so called “social institution”. (232) Furthermore, Milbank believes that, “Christianity…uniquely has this idea of [true] community… ” and “…hope for [this] community” which “…means the freedom of people and groups to be different, yet totally refuses indifference”. Later Milbank adds, that unless theology reflects the singularity of the norms of this unique community, it “… has nothing to think about”. First of all, the latter statement about the purpose of theology is rather bold. Theology is always between community and God, trying to incorporate all different practices and put them in order according to Christian traditions. It always strives to explain this inexpressible reality that community tries to respond to by reflecting in itself a wide variety of different theories and practices. In post-modernity the main task of theology
The New Jerusalem, of which the victorious the Lamb is the center, evokes rich images of all creation centered in worship around the Lamb from whom all life flows. These images of Revelation 21 & 22 give purpose to the Church who, like a bride, awaits her groom. The eschatological reality of the coming Kingdom of God, inaugurated in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, presently breaks forth to forms the Church for its mission. As Aleksandr Schmemann writes, “the Church itself is a leitourgia, a ministry, a calling to act in this world after the fashion of Christ, to bear testimony to Him and His kingdom.”1 This leitourgia is embodied in the central practice of the Church, instituted by the Lord, the Eucharist.
Furthermore, it is vitally crucial for the church leadership to clearly articulate its missional vision, which is to be embraced by the rest of the church’s community. The process of spiritual transformation starts from the invitation and continues through engagement and discipleship. This transformational process embodies the missional vision and the language for 'right now ' and 'here '. Surely, the church’s vision ought to be aligned with the missional attributes of the gospel itself, which are 'the good news is for everyone ' and 'belonging before believing '. Our witness should take place amidst relationship and listening. One principle that I consider to be exceptionally useful in my community is St. Patrick’s idea of Celtic Evangelism: establish community, engage in conversation, and invite commitment (2009, 101).