preview

Dialectical Journal All The Light We Cannot See

Decent Essays

Entry #2 In the book, All the Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doerr, Doerr changes the narration of the book by interchanging the two characters’ perspectives. I think that the narration change between the two characters made the book more intriguing to read. One example of when the story was more intriguing was in chapter eight where Marie-Laure was hiding from the German soldiers who had been searching the house for a couple of days. This part was really intense because the soldiers wouldn’t leave until they walked away with what they wanted. The next section went on to tell the story about Werner and his mission in Saint-Malo. Werner’s interruption made the story more suspenseful because I had to wait a couple of chapters before finding …show more content…

Werner’s view of the war was that it was real and it was his only way to get out of working in the mines, unlike all the other boys his age. On page 116, Werner is at a Nazi training camp in Schulpforta and he remembers what was said to him and Jutta back in Zollverein at the orphanage, “Exceptional. Unexpected. We will only take the purest, only the strongest. The only place your brother is going, little girl, is into the mines” (116). Back in Zollverein, Werner never thought that it was possible for him to get out of going to the mines, but he made it to Schulpforta. Furthermore, Werner yells, “Heil Hitler!” (116). Werner screaming “Heil Hitler” shows that he is in support of Hitler and the war. On the other hand, Marie-Laure was in denial about the war. On page 97, Marie-Laure is hiding in a room from the bombings that are happening outside, “She smells smoke and knows. Fire. The glass has shattered out of her bedroom window, and what she hears is the sound of something burning beyond the shutters.... ‘Ce n’est pas la réalité’” (97). Even with all the commotion of the fire and the broken windows, Marie-Laure still tried to convince herself that everything that was happening wasn’t real. When she says, “‘Ce n’est pas la réalité’”, that translates into: it’s not reality. By Marie-Laure saying it’s not real, it goes to show how much in denial she is …show more content…

Unlike the changes between the narration of the story, I didn’t like how Doerr wrote in an unorganized fashion. I personally thought that this made the book more confusing to read because the timeline of events was all over the place. For instance, the book begins in the middle of the Saint-Malo siege. I was very confused at what was going on and why this part of France was being bombed and wasn’t given much context to figure out that this book was taking place in the midst of World War II. I didn’t fully understand what was happening until two chapters later, when Doerr chose to write the chapter in the same time period. As for the two chapters in between, the following chapter went back to the very beginning of the war and the strength of the Third Reich. This was helpful information so I knew what time period the book was taking place. The chapter following that one was written as 1934, before any part of the war had taken place. The disorder of events made it hard to put together what was happening in the book versus what was actually happening during World War II at that specific point in time. If this book had been written chronologically, I think that it would’ve been much easier to understand and there wouldn’t be as much confusion in the order of

Get Access