I think that Caesar was a better leader than Cleopatra, because he was actually kinda already a leader to the people in Rome. Cleopatra did not really lead anybody she was just a women who wanted power and to be on top. She wanted to rule everyone and from the story on actively learn it seems like she did not care about anybody she just wanted to be a head of everything, and also have the throne. Cleopatra killed her brother and sister just to make sure and guarantee that she becomes queen. In which seems not leadership nor good, in the end she also killed herself. Caesar on the other hand fought for what he believed in and fought for the people, he went to war and was gone for years until he was finished with what he had to get done. For example when Caesar came back to Rome after the whole fighting thing, he told the people that he did not wish to be king. Before Caesar came back, Caesar told his friend to go to Rome and ask the people what they wanted in the film. In which made the people like Caesar even more because he actually cared about his people in Rome, unlike the other senators. The other senators were different from Caesar because they did not care what the people wanted in Rome nor did they bother to ask them, what they wanted. The other senators only cared about royalty and getting what they wanted and what their children or significant other wanted. Cleopatra did have an army that set camp up outside of Alexandria, all because she wanted sole leadership so
Unlike the common view of leaders, the potential leaders of Julius Caesar are not necessarily nice or giving. However, sometimes that is necessary. In the play Julius Caesar, a long tale of leadership shows the true qualities of the greatest leaders. Where the reader finds themselves started is at the point which Antony and Caesar, the overconfident leader of Rome, are discussing people around them. This discussion boils to a point in which Antony and Caesar discuss the possibility of Cassius being a threat to Caesar. Later, readers find Cassius is indeed a threat, as he and multiple others, including Brutus, stab Caesar to death. Antony then brings Caesar’s body to the multitude, and with a great speech inspires a hatred for those who wrongfully stabbed him. At the next point Antony is seen, he and Octavius are the new rulers of Rome. These two comrades go and finally eliminate the last of the traitors, Cassius and Brutus, in a battle that cements the two as the new leaders of Rome. Throughout all these actions, one man particularly showed that he should control the Roman Empire. Antony was created to be Rome’s leader in Julius Caesar, where William Shakespeare gave him inspirational abilities, persuasiveness, and fearlessness which are unparalleled.
When humanity thinks of Julius Caesar most of them do not compare him with another great leader, Abraham Lincoln. Or when people think of Abraham Lincoln, they don’t often compare him to Julius Caesar. These two men may be the unlikeliest people to be compared together, but the thing is they have many significant similarities to each other. They may have been born in two different time periods, but the effects of their lives are still affecting individuals and countries today. Some of their similarities include both had a great impact on their country, both of them change the world, and people still look up to them to this day.
"For Rome, who had never condescended to fear any nation or people, did in her time fear two human beings; one was Hannibal, and the other was a woman" (Lefkowitz and Fant 126). During a time dominated by male rulers, Cleopatra VII Philopator (69 BCE – 31 BCE), the Last Pharaoh of Egypt, stood out among them all. With Egypt’s wealth at her disposal, she was “incomparably richer than anyone else” (Schiff 2). The amount of power a ruler had at the time of Cleopatra’s existence depended highly on the level of financial stability. However, wealth was not all Cleopatra was known for. She exhibited high militant leadership skills equal to that of her male counterparts to keep Egypt a prosperous country.
Queen Cleopatra Thea Philopator VII, born 69 B.C and died about 30 B.C. had a few dimensions of leadership. First, she was pioneering. Cleopatra VII was charismatic, dynamic, bold, and good at making connections. She was cunning in her pursuits to get what she wanted. One time, she slipped through the enemies line and was smuggled secretly into Egypt rolled up in a carpet to see Julius Caesar in order to become his ally. (Peters, 2017) When she lost the throne to her brother, Cleopatra did not want to accept the loss and produced a militia that attacked her brother in Pelusium. Her brother was drowned when she won the future battle. (Peters,
Although Julius Caesar was an excellent leader, he was not as great of a ruler as Augustus Caesar. A major key to being a good leader is that the leader should try to keep his or her people safe. Peace and protection is far better than havoc and destruction. Julius Caesar was a warlord, not a
The play Julius Caesar written by Julius Caesar illustrates the murder of Julius Caesar by his Senate and the events that happened after his death. The famous funeral speeches given by Mark Antony and Brutus give the Roman people two different sides of Julius Caesar and his leadership using ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos is the credibility of the speaker, logos is the logic or reasoning, and pathos is the emotion of the audience. Mark Antony delivers the most effective speech in the play as he appeals to these three elements in his speech in a more convincing manner than Brutus.
“They mainly agreed with the idea that Cleopatra to take the blame for all the turmoil because she wasn’t Egyptian.” Nonetheless, Cleopatra wasn’t discouraged then, she didn’t get anything get in the way of keeping her throne. She killed her brother whom she was married to, and also ordered for her sister to be killed so she won’t block her way in fulfilling her years in power. “Cleopatra created alliance with Rome’s strong leaders by offering them financial support and resources.” Because Egypt was a rich country at that time, Rome started to depend on Egypt’s wealth.
The king of kings Alexander the Great and Gaius Julius Caesar are considered to this day as some of the most influential rulers and military generals in history. While there’s a distinct difference between their journey to power and background, it’s undeniable that the two leaders share many similar characteristics and the infamous ambition both possess that drives them almost to the brink of obsession in order to achieve their individual goals.
The division of the royal family provided Cleopatra with an opportunity to use Caesar to kill her siblings in battle. As Cleopatra wanted, Caesar reinforced his troops and easily defeated the rebels resulting in Ptolemy drowning while retreating. Following this Caesar captured Arsinoe, who had survived and sent her back to his country of Rome as a prisoner. Caesar also executed numerous enemies of Cleopatra and imprisoned others who opposed her. Caesar also supplied Cleopatra with a child, whom after Ptolemy XIV’s death she made co-regent as a three year couldn't interfere with her plans (Schiff, 2010).
Cleopatra was the queen of Egypt from about 51 B.C.to about 30 B.C. She was a member of the royal dynasty called the Ptolemies. The Ptolemies were not Egyptian, but Greek, “which makes Cleopatra approximately as Egyptian as Elizabeth Taylor.” Despite this “within the country their legitimacy derived from a fabricated link with the pharaohs”, and they took over and ruled Egypt for 300 years; Cleopatra was the last of that royal line. Rome was gaining power and territory. Cleopatra inherited the throne of Egypt when she was eighteen years old, but she had to share it with her 12 year old brother. Cleopatra got kicked out of power by her brother 's friends because the two did not get along. In 48 BC, Julius Caesar arrived in Egypt and declared that he would settle the dispute between Cleopatra and her brother, and “She had no choice but ingratiate herself with the new master of the Roman world.” To further protect her kingdom, Cleopatra having Caesar over to her side, began an affair with him. For the rest of her rule,“she struggled tot run the implacable Roman tide to her advantage, changing patrons again
A leader is in comparison to the caretaker, supporter, and representative of a community. Julius Caesar is a prime example of a leader. During this time period Julius Caesar fought and protected Rome. When Caesar returns home from defeating Pompey he is greeted and adored by the commoners. The citizens looked up to Caesar and put him higher than themselves. Julius Caesar was an excellent leader and fought for the best of Rome. Caesar was a great leader, because he was brave and loved selflessly. Also, Caesar was a prominent leader, because in his will he set aside all his property aside to be used for his community for recreational use. When Julius Caesar was alive he was a huge supporter and leader to Rome.
Caesar had acclaimed himself to be the ruler of Egypt bringing 32 legionaries and 800 cavalry showing his true intentions of what he meant by being ruler of Egypt. He also brought twelve other soldiers who carried a bundle of rods with an axe with a blade that projected out. This was considered a badge of authority. After this Cleopatra’s sister Arsinoe and Ptolemy VIII declared rulers of Egypt as Arsinoe IV. Cleopatra wrapped herself up into a carpet and was delivered to Caesar’s palace. In his presence she became very seductive and managed to persuade Caesar to help her. The Alexandrian War started and during the war part of the Alexandrian library was burnt down along with some warehouses. During the war Caesar executed Pothinus and Ptolemy VIII drowned in the Nile trying to escape. Alexandria surrendered to Caesar who then captured Cleopatra’s younger sister and rightfully restored Cleopatra to the thrown.
All of these reasons show that Cleopatra was an amazing leader and should always be remembered in ancient history. Cleopatra may not have been the first female pharaoh, but she is certainly the most influential. She proved that women can be pharaohs as well as men, and still be just as, if not more, powerful. Cleopatra proved to Egypt that she could be an amazing leader and control the country appropriately. Her smart move of bonding with two powerful Roman leaders, Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, showed that she thinks ahead and is a suitable leader for Egypt.
She used her appeal to seduce Caesar in order to accomplish a goal that would be beneficial for the whole of Egypt. This was her response to the cultural normalcy that served as a hindrance to her leadership ability but found alternate ways to show her power and prominence. Cleopatra used the resources available to her and did what she had to do to remain in power. She used Rome to regain control,she tried to depict herself as a solid, capable, and relatable leader for her followers, and finally, she seduced Caesar and defeated her brother to establish herself as a stable ruler in Egyptian leadership. However, Cleopatra did have a need for power that was borderline lustful and ultimately leads to demise. When Rome took of Egypt, to avoid humiliation, she decided to die a more honorable and godly death. She took her own life by being “bit by an asp, which was considered godly”, and therefore elevated her further in the people's’ eyes (129). Even in death, she was revered and demonstrated her success as a leader despite not being the most ethical one. Her death gained power for her. Cleopatra faced many problems as queen of Egpyt but pushed through them with determination. She won the hearts of her people with charm and confidence and showed her intelligence in the political tactics she used for power for Egypt. Her independence and ambition made her a successful leader because she didn’t let people
Cleopatra (1963) extravagantly portrays Cleopatra’s ability to challenge traditional Egyptian gender roles. Cleopatra was able to support a legitimate rule because of her influence over people that led to the advantageous relationships with Julius Caesar and Marc Antony which in turn could help her country prosper. The Cleopatra film is historically accurate and able to discuss the ways that Cleopatra was able to assert herself as a ruler in Egypt during a tumultuous time in history, both through her country and her ties to Rome through her relationships. Cleopatra ruled Egypt from about 51 B.C to 30 B.C in the Ptolemaic period before Egypt became a Roman province under the name “Aegyptus.” She was able to go beyond the female role in a patriarchal