preview

Differing Opinions of Bleak House Essay

Better Essays

Differing Opinions of Bleak House

When Bleak House, by Charles Dickens, was published in 1853, it did not go unnoticed by critics. The reviews of the period where anything but tepid in tone or opinion in regard to Dickens’ newest novel. Most notably, the critics were concerned with the structure of the novel, characterization, and, in particular, Esther as a plausible character. By singling out reviewers from different publications of the time, it is possible to see what the public in 1853 was reading about Bleak House in regard to these issues.

Structure
The contemporary reviewers of Bleak House fall into two categories when discussing its structure. There are those who like it and there are those who do not. More specifically, …show more content…

From the article “Characters in Bleak House” in Putnam’s Monthly in 1853, an anonymous reviewer further states that regarding the Chancery suit “the climaxes keep occurring all the way through; our overwrought expectations . . . are at last dashed . . .”(163). The incidents in the book then are unconnected with each other and although readers may expect a resolution to come at the end, there is none. Those adverse to the structure of Bleak House find that the Chancery suit, which Dickens used to bind his story, is not effective at its job. The Chancery suit only affects the characters superficially, not causing any defining changes within their personalities, and in the end, not coming to a satisfying conclusion. Brimley accuses Dickens of “indulging in stale satire at the length and expense of Chancery proceedings”(161).

Opposed to Brimley are those reviewers who rave about the structure of Bleak House. John Forster, in his review of Bleak House published in The Examiner in 1853, found that seemingly isolated actions and interests of all characters connect to progress the story through to its end. He notes, “even the fits of the little law-stationer’s servant aid directly in the chain of little things that lead indirectly to the catastrophe of Lady Dedlock’s death”(162). Henry Fothergill Chorley, in his review of Bleak House published in The Athenaeum in 1853, agreed and wrote: “Not a point is missed,--not

Get Access