Disadvantages Of Books

In this society that is gradually becoming increasingly dependent on technology, will literature slowly disappear from the minds of the population? This is the question that Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, attempts to answer. In this book, he describes a hypothetical world in which the population not only avoids reading, but has made owning books an unthinkable crime, with all books discovered burned, along with the houses of those who hoarded them. In this dystopian future created by Bradbury, the beauty that is literature has been replaced in society by television programs and radio stations. This reveals Bradbury’s obvious fear that modern technology would completely replace books- a legitimate concern to have. In 2015, the value of books differ between groups of people. The disadvantage of this is that books provide the readers opportunity to allow their imaginations to run wild, something that television and radio never could. Fahrenheit 451 addresses the problem and fear of overwhelming technology through its fictional world, which shows what would happen should people render literature completely useless through the use of television and radios.

In Dana Gioia’s article titled “Why Literature Matters”, he explains about the decline of reading literature for young Americans. Although “income rose to unforeseen levels, college attendance ballooned, and access of information increased enormously” he states, “the interest young Americans showed in the arts… diminished”. In his article, Gioia uses surveys, articles, studies, and statistics to persuade his audience that the decline of reading in America can have a negative effect on society.

In the modern day society, books are frowned upon; however, interactive media such as television and seashell radios are highly encouraged. In Fahrenheit 451, Professor Faber fears the aftermath of the world without literature and is portrayed as too cowardly to take action, a “Queen bee, safe in the hive” (87). Through Faber’s lecture to Montag, Ray Bradbury aggrandizes his pessimistic view on society by using characterization, diction, and the selection of detail to present the idea that society relies upon pleasure and happiness so much that literature and common knowledge are rapidly disappearing.

Have you ever wondered what the world would be like without the freedom to read books as you please? One possible answer to this question can be ironically found by reading Fahrenheit 451. This book has a futuristic view of how technology could potentially take over society, creating less and less of a need for physical books until they are eventually banned and all the ideas that come from them are thought to be ‘evil’. In Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, the society loses its power and purpose because individuals lose their ability to live a full life involving relationships, meaningful activities, and rich ideas.

Dana Gioia creates a theme of anxiousness as she doubts on our society. When polling members on skill deficiencies, poor reading skills was ranked as second, showing that many young adults also ar4e not and advances as they should be. She is truthful in her word hen she says that as b” more americans lose this capability, our nation becomes more informed, active and independent minded.” Gioia proves to us that unless we get back on track and start regenerating the thought of reading literature so that more people will begin to do so and think of in a way of which we think of our cell phones then we can begin to have a more strong , developed and smart nation that knows literature is a crucial part of our

Imagine a future of cluelessness. Daily activities we used to enjoy are all but the sounds of quite motionless nothing. Talking to people would become a challenging task of trying to remember grammar one might have use and learned years ago. The less people with books in the hand can cause a nation with less knowledge in their head. “Reading for Pleasure is in Painful Decline” by.

Have you ever read such a great book that you became completely infatuated with it? You feel the pain, happiness, sadness that the characters feel; you feel as if you personally know the characters. You begin to forget that what you are reading is just a creative piece of writing because you are so infatuated with it. Reading for pleasure is a way to escape reality, a way to be inspired, a way to become more knowledgeable, and even a way to gain a new identity (Storm). In this day and age however, students prefer not to read for pleasure during their free time, such as summer vacations (McGaha). A major obstacle that students face today is technology. With technology expanding so rapidly, it seems that students are more focused on owning

Dana Gioia, author of the article "why Literature Matters", writes about the decline of reading in the U.S. and how it affects our society. The consequences of people not reading are expressed through his specific factual evidence and his prediction of what is going to happen if the American people continue to ignore this issue.

As the world continues to advance technologically, the demand and interest of books will continue to decline. If we aren’t careful we could end up like the society in Fahrenheit 451 where books are banned. In Fahrenheit 451 Ray Bradbury’s central argument is that the tv and radio and other technologies will make the general populous forget about books in order to get a more immediate high. This in turn will turn the people into empty shells without emotions or any complex thought.

INTRO PARAGRAPH: The author of the piece “Why Literature Matters”, Dana Gioia, builds a strong argument in favor of why reading literature matters so much, even in today’s technologically advanced and electronically centered environment. Gioia’s piece, (written in 2005), spoke volumes upon the the idea that even Albert Einstein once prophesied. “I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction.

In an age where the printed novel has been somewhat on the decline, and the necessity of readable fiction has almost faded into obscurity. I believe that literature still harbours a crucial part within our society; from the very foundations of most theatrical adaptations, to preserving the culture and encapsulating the feelings of generations past. In this case literature cements itself as one of the most decisive elements of our civilisation, and combining it with history makes it become a testament to who we are as people, as well as the conservation of both our progression and degradation. I have always enjoyed reading literature, from reading J.R.R Tolkien’s classic ‘Lord of the Rings’ trilogy within my childhood, to perhaps more sophisticated,

It is possible that we will arrive at a future where no one will want to read books, but it would only be achieved by putting in

Writer, Dana Gioia in his article “Why Literature Matters”, argues that the decline in reading will have a negative effect on society. He supports this claim by first stating that it is an important part of the business world, he then explains that young people will not understand the ideals of citizenship, and finally he claims that there will be long-term social and economic problems. Gioia’s purpose is to inform and persuade his audience in order to bring attention to the problem in reading. He adopts an informative and concerning tone, so that everyone can pitch in and do something about the decline in reading.

Some say that audiobooks are even better than physical books. Many people think that being able to multi-task while listening to an audiobook causes it to have more benefits. However, while people may be able to drive or clean when listening, multi-tasking may cause distractions. These distractions will lead to the listener missing key plot points to a book. People also say that when listening to an audiobook listeners are not able to skip over boring parts of the book, and are forced to hear the whole story. This is true, however, people skip over the tedious parts because they do not find them interesting. Enabling people to skip lifeless parts can lead them to undervalue the book. Many people also claim that children listening to audiobooks improve listening skills. However, it is better for kids have to have the physical book in front of them. This keeps them from getting distracted when listening to the audiobook. Therefore, without the books, the children are not profiting from listening to the

During the development of technology, most people have shifted to use electronic books to read both academic and non-academic texts. However, despite the technological changes, there has been a wide debate about the benefits of paper books over the e-books. It is important to understand that various reasons are suggesting why people should shift back to using the traditional books rather than the electronic ones. Even though some think that e-books are better that traditional ones, I believe that readers should return to traditional books because of various reasons.