One of the immense drawbacks of hydrofracturing is the amount of water used up in the process and the wastewater generated. Many states, such as California, are currently stuck in a serious drought and need all the water they can get. However, fracking takes up enormous amounts of water as "it can take up to 4 million gallons of water to fracture a horizontally drilled shale well" (Ohio Department of Natural Resources), water that could be purified and given to the people in need. After up to 4 million gallons of water are used up in a single fracking process, "California[‘s] oil wells return five gallons of "produced water," often laced with contaminants such as boron, ammonia, and organic compounds, for every barrel of oil" (Environment California).
The job of fracking constitutes of gas being released to supply both Australia and overseas countries. Administrators and workers take this process seriously as every cubic foot of gas is measured and supplied. Although potential health problems have been recognized, the companies have been focusing on the collection grid and the and the shortage of regional community employees as only 2% of the workforce is applied for the job. Another economical factor is that Fracking is destroying jobs in other industries. These include manufacturing, tourism and agriculture as well as gas related fields. This caused a major problem in for farmers as they live on rent as well as the decrease of jobs is becoming difficult to maintain that wage. Furthermore, as the natural is supplied throughout the world, citizens must pay double or triple the prices in the upcoming years due to this fracking site.
In addition to the already lost list of carcinogenic chemicals, the flowback can bring heavy metals from 2 miles deep such as mercury, lead, uranium, and radium. There’s no way to look at this in a positive light. To add to the many vices of fracking is the fact that it’s extremely water intensive, which is a major concern in our drought-stricken state. It takes 8 MILLION GALLONS of water that we just don’t have to frack a well. Oil companies have already laid out plans for a potential of 25,000 wells throughout California. Since each well can be fracked an average of 18 times, we’re looking at water consumption upwards of 3.6 TRILLION GALLONS. This is completely unacceptable. On top of this, fracking releases large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Methane is 82 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. In a time when climate change is an inevitable issue, this needs to be taken into
“I´m very proud that the state of Vermont banned fracking. I hope communities all over California, and all over America do the same.”- Sen. Bernie Sanders. Although, fracking may seem safe, it really isn't. In fact, many have reported contaminated sources near fracking areas. However, living near a fracking well can cause a hard life in the household, that is near a site. Once again, problems arise as fracking becomes a common practice. Even though, there are advantages they are not reasonable. All in all, there are multiple reasons why fracking is not safe.
Fracking is the process of drilling a well ten thousand feet into the ground and putting chemicals in water and shooting the high pressure water into the rockbed, which extracts the gases.
Hydraulic Fracking is the act of shooting or drilling chemicals and liquids into the ground at a high speed in order to break the rocks and earth below. When you break the rocks, or fracture them, it releases the natural gas that is trapped inside. Fracking is a controversial topic, with benefits seen by some and devastating results seen by others. The state of Texas allows fracking, and it is a technique used all over the state. The Obama administration and the federal government believe that fracking can lead the country away from dependence on fossil fuels and into a new generation of clean energy. However, environmental agencies believe that fracking is just another energy source that is no better for the environment than coal, and leads to contaminated water. Fracking companies do not have to follow the Safe Water Drinking Act of 1974, whose purpose is to protect groundwater for the people.
fluid 8,000 feet into the ground to extract oil and natural gasses from shale plays. Although fracking has been around for nearly 60 years, the controversy surrounding it didn’t begin until approximately 2008, when oil and natural gas in the United States hit an all-time low. As a result, we depended heavily upon other countries like Saudi Arabia for our oil. The situation was less than ideal and the U.S. was seeking new ways to gain independence. On December 19, 2007 the Energy Independence and Security Act was signed into legislation thus, marking the beginning of the search for natural gas and oil in the United States otherwise known as the “Fracking
Fracking is the process where pressurized water is injected into shale beds, or layers of sedimentary rock, which opens the rock to release oil and natural gas. Fracking is dangerous for many reasons, but one of the strongest affects it has is on our drinking water. Anywhere from 2 to 8 million gallons of water are used to frack only one well. Shockingly, just 10 percent of the water used returns to the surface. However, water isn’t the only thing being put in the ground- a “toxic stew” of chemicals and sand are also added. Over 40,000 gallons of chemicals are used every time we frack. The chemicals in the fracking mixture can make its way to our groundwater, harming the
Many see hydraulic fracturing or fracking as a good source of oil pumping but others see major problems with this process. Hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’ is the process of oil and gas pumping using a water, sand and some chemicals to drill horizontally against rocks. The water and sands pressure is raised to a point of breaking or fracturing the rocks which then releases the oil and gases (Lallanilla). There are many pros and cons to this process of fracking. Some more than others.
Fracking is a safe way of producing oil and natural gasses. Some of the benefits of fracking are lower energy costs, because of the large deposits of oil and gas there has been a big increase in available resources and a big drop in prices. This can lead to a sustainable amount of savings for consumers. Another benefit of fracking is that consumers of energy are seeing economic change in global prices and lowered taxes on gas and oil. More jobs are being created and our reliability on other country’s oil is reduced significantly. For the most part, most of the fracking fluid stays in the ground but when it does come up, it’s either dumped in rivers and streams, left in open pits and contaminates our air, or it gets hauled away. The toxic fracking
Fracking is a very debated topic around the world, whether we should continue fracking for the oil and gas it produces, or if the pollution caused by fracking is too much of problem. On the negative side of fracking, the effects from include: worsened asthma, stress, heavy pollution around the oil and gas sites, etc. If you look on the positive side of fracking you’ll find it is a way of producing oil and gas that could take America to the top in terms of energy export around the world, and it creates numerous jobs, which surely helps out the American economy.
Do you know what facking is, well it is the process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, etc., so as to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas.The topic of this essay is to help people know that fracking is not good. Fracking has a negative effect on the planet and the creatures living on it. This can be a very expensive process, when all it does is harm you.
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, does many things to improve people’s lives as well as the economy. If fracking were to be banned nationwide, hundreds of thousands of people would be out of work. That is hundreds of thousands of families that would financially struggle because liberals simply do not understand basic fracking techniques. Putting a ban on fracking would also be hurtful to the economy in many ways. Obviously, people out of work hurts the economy. Being energy independent would be very beneficial towards the economy but this goal can never achieved without natural gas.
One of the most fiercely debated topics in environmental engineering is whether or not the benefits of hydraulic fracturing outweigh the cons. On one side of the spectrum, many believe that hydraulic fracturing is harmful to the environment. Surrounding ecosystems are heavily damaged by toxic chemicals used in fracking. The process can also taint large bodies of water causing many species to be harmed. Hydraulic fracturing may also potentially cause major climate changes.
Fracking, better known as hydraulic fracking has been around since 1949 (Global Energy Affairs), and has helped our economy in many different ways; such as, providing economic benefits, supporting the U.S. with more natural resources, and using safer drilling and production practices, and it is better for our environment. However, fracking can also be extremely terrible for our economy, such as; water droughts, health effects, and noise pollution. There are two sides to hydraulic fracking, and through resource I will form my opinion (Occupy Theory).
Frack sites can break down and cause a bundle of problems. Communities with fracking have seen decline in property values, increases in crime, and losses in local tourism. When a community loses tourism and gains an increase in crime it may not be an area where a new company would want to settle, worsening the economy. Fracking is said to have caused earthquakes when a pipe ruptures. If a pipe ruptures it damage a fault line pushing one tectonic plate closer toward the earthquake point. If a storage tank for fracking breaks it may leak out into crops and streams and poison our ecosystem. If the fracking fluid does as much as decimates on of the species in the ecosystem, then it will put the whole ecosystem out of whack causing numerous problems.