A Close look at Charles Duhigg and Dr. Philip Zimbardo’s works
Dr. Philip Zimbardo’s works in the field of Social Psychology cracked open many formidable theories that has resonated for many generations. His Stanford Prison experiment showcased a hidden value which is yet to be fully realized. Power corrupts but it does not corrupt everyone equally. The human personality variations are not succinctly represented in some of his experiments but there are safe points that can be deduced. Young males have a higher tendency for social dominance, narcissism, authoritarianism, aggressiveness and lower on measures of altruism and empathy. The experiment may have various critics but it opened the world to another dynamic of human behavior.
This experiment has shown that power isn’t inherently good or evil. It may alter perception such as increased risk tasking, sensitivity to internal thoughts, creativity, optimism, etc. However, these are not essentially bad outcomes. When power is appropriately used, it can bring positive effects on people. There are people who work in different positions to make the world a better place. One key point that must be mentioned is that power amplifies the person. It gives a louder voice to already existing personality dispositions and tendencies. The person and his unique situation make for
…show more content…
He claims that each of these routines is triggered by a cue and end with a reward. His idea is that old/negative routines can be wiped off by instituting a positive routine. Habits such as making one’s bed (easy) to exercise (hard) can define how productive a person can be in a day or even in life. Tasks become less tedious when it is consistently performed over a given time. It further reiterated the philosophy that the hardest part of any task is to start it. This explains why some leading brands in the world keep doing the same thing in order to generate good
In the Stanford prison experiment, Zimbardo analyzes how human behavior can change based one’s surroundings and what they are told to do. Normal college students are given roles to play in a mock prison. In this experiment, people are assigned jobs as prison guards and prisoners. The prison guards quickly adapted to their roles. They saw no problem treating the prisoners with no respect. These students use violence against the other students to show their leadership and dominance. The prisoners quickly got accustomed to their parts as well.The prisoners believed that they deserved the punishment. “The experiment shows that good people under the wrong circumstances can behave just like those that we vilify” (Zimbardo). With this experiment, Zimbardo studies the Lucifer Effect. The Lucifer Effect is understanding how good people become evil. He uses his data from this experiment to further develop the Lucifer Effect theory and find out why the Nazis treated the Jews with such cruelty. His results show that when given the opportunity and in the right environment, humans will dehumanize other
Too much power can change a person’s attitude, behavior, etc. Power is something that can be taken for granted or put in the wrong hands. When given a lot of power someone can go on power trips or do evil things. That is when power corrupts people.
1). The guards themselves did not feel any guilt while enacting their behavior against the prisoners until after the experiment ended. The behavior of the guards may be related to the term of demand characteristics, which means that they acted the way they did just because they knew they were a part of a study. Zimbardo had told them how he wanted them to behave and they gave him just that. In a way the social desirability bias applies here because they were trying to conform to the “normal” idea of a prison guard.
Gladwell strategically uses the Zimbardo Prison Experiment, because this shows that with the two previous cases that the possibility of the subject being a criminal was eliminated. This experiment shows that even educated Stanford students in a monitored and controlled atmosphere are at the mercy of the social context around them. In the Zimbardo six days in because of the effect it was having on the prisoners. “I realize now,” one prisoner said after the experiment was over, “that no matter how together I thought I was in my head, my prison behavior was often less under my control than I realized” (296). This study shows that under a controlled atmosphere that educated Stanford students are not greater than the social context around them. Unlike in the first two examples the Stanford experiment was more inclusive and showed that anyone even highly educated non criminals could have their behaviors altered by mere contextual
In Maria Konnikova’s “The Real Lesson of the Stanford Prison Experiment” she reveals what she believes to be the reality of sociologist Philip Zimbardo’s controversial study: its participants were not “regular” people.
Power is not inherently a bad tool, but it is when it is placed into the wrong hands. When or if it is placed in the wrong hands, it can corrupt the holder. Even if they do not have bad intentions, the power may corrupt them into using it for bad intentions. The quote stated by Machiavelli, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely” is true because too much power can corrupt an individual’s thoughts and this can be proved through the book One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest written by Ken Kesey, and also the “Stanford Prison Experiment” which was conducted by Philip Zimbardo.
Social psychologist, Philip Zimbardo, has lead one of the most infamous experiments in the modern history with the Stanford Prison Experiment. The immense popularity of the experimental research on situational power, although having cultivated great recognition, has overshadowed the multiple contributions and accomplishments that Zimbardo continues to assume in his lifetime. Many of Zimbardo’s recognitions have been brought upon due to the Stanford Prison Experiment, yet in this paper will extensively examine Zimbardo’s psychological career from the beginning to the current date to recognize his notable influence in the field of Psychology, specifically the field of Social Psychology. This brief review of Zimbardo’s lengthy career will include various facts and personal accounts of Zimbardo’s regarding his life and work. Zimbardo’s lifetime of work has mainly focused and researched the multiple flaws of human’s beings, and it’s through his findings that society is truly able to progress forward positively. Zimbardo’s long career exemplifies that of an unrestricted devotion; he has and still works to better society through its various flaws, making him undoubtably impactful.
A lot of people have proven that power creates a big difference in a society. Individuals can come together and abuse it. Power is what makes people feel superior to others. Power has a negative effect on others because people with power control people and treat those beneath them with contempt.
As evidenced from multiple books, power is something that is easy to abuse. When an individual is given the ability to control the masses, it can be used incorrectly. Power can lead to abusiveness, irresponsibility, and overconfidence.
In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues created the experiment known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo wanted to investigate further into human behavior, so he created this experiment that looked at the impact of taking the role of a prisoner or prison guard. These researchers examined how the participants would react when placed in an institutionalized prison environment. They set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building. Twenty four undergraduate students were selected to play the roles of both prisoners and guards. These students were chosen because they were emotional, physically, and mentally stable. Though the experiment was expected to last two weeks, it only lasted six days after the researchers and participants became aware of the harm that was being done.
In 1971 Zimbardo performed a psychological test at Stanford University. They simulated what it would be like to be either a prisoner or a prison guard while Zimbardo acted as superintendent. Throughout the experiment it became clear that bad systems and bad situations could lead good people into behaving in ways they normally wouldn’t. Some of the volunteers for the SPE who were assigned to be the guards started acting sadistically, abusing their newfound power. They align with Zimbardo’s definition of evil by degrading, demeaning and hurting the prisoners.
Power changes a person in one of two ways: it can turn them into a power crazed maniac or it can completely deplete and make them feel like a grain of sand. In George Orwell’s book, Animal Farm and in Elie Weilsel’s book, Night shows us that having too much or too little power can change someone in a negative way. In Animal Farm, Napoleon is changing the commandments and rules to fit his needs.
People in this world love to have power over something or someone and in some cases they do not know how to use their power in the right way.Power has a negative effect on others because some rulers will take laws to the extreme just because they can and have the power to.
Dr. Zimbardo’s 1974’s Stanford prison experiment proved that there are blurred lines between good and evil. Dr. Zimbardo (2015, Jul 15), researcher and writer for Psychology Today, explains that we
In 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) in the basement of Stanford University as a mock prison. Zimbardo’s aim was to examine the effect of roles, to see what happens when you put good people in an evil place and to see how this effects tyranny. He needed participants to be either ‘prisoners’ or ‘guards’ and recruited them through an advertisement, 75 male college students responded and 24 healthy males were chosen and were randomly allocated roles. Zimbardo wanted to encourage deindividuation by giving participants different uniforms and different living conditions (the guards had luxuries and the prisoners were living as real prisoners). The guards quickly began acting authoritarian, being aggressive towards the prisoners and giving them punishments causing physical and emotional breakdowns. Zimbardo’s intention was for his study to last for 2 weeks, however, it