The Effect of Natural Forces on the Characters in Sister Carrie
In the novel, Sister Carrie, many characters believe that they have the ability to pave the pathway toward their future. However, they don’t realize that few of these actions are determined by them. They are clueless as to how little a choice they have in making their decision, because of the natural forces that impact them. Forces such as societal pressure, luck, and their level of sophistication impact their state of mind, causing them to pursue a different pathway. These forces cause Hurstwood and Carrie to purse an option that they would not normally pursue. Hurstwood and Carrie believe that they have more control over their lives then they actually do. However, it appears that their varying degrees of self determination is less than they assume because of forces, such as level of sophistication, luck, and societal pressure that play a profound role in dictating their decisions.
What appears to be human choice is influenced by the character’s subjectivity and recklessness towards their situation, depending on their age. Dreiser only reveals to the reader that Carrie is from Wisconsin; however, he fails to inform the reader anymore about her past or experiences that she has had. This leads one to believe that Carrie is experiencing these events for the first time, making her vulnerable to the deception others display, until she learns to use deception and trickery for personal gain (Prizer 577). She begins to
without regard for their future. Jacobs does so when she “risks everything for the throw of a die”
The concept of free will is essential in topics related to choice. The way people live their lives is constructed by decisions they make on a daily basis, such as whether or not to attend a college classes or what job to choose in the future. But in “Living Like Weasels”, Annie Dillard realizes that the concept of free will is not pure. Society has a tendency to drive an individual’s choice based on what is the norm. Through her observations of a weasel, Dillard makes a commentary on the relationship between people and free will. In “Living Like Weasels”, Annie Dillard uses the analysis of a weasel to remind society about the often overlooked power of free will embedded in human nature.
An initial reading of A Jury of Her Peers suggests that the author focuses on the common stereotypes of women in the 1800s; however, a close reading reveals that the text also examines the idea that they are more capable than men may think. The fact that Mrs. Wright was able to pull off killing her husband by herself and without the men finding out proves that she is very capable and did not need the help of men to pull it off. The men at the time believed that women were incapable of doing things by themselves and thought that they should just stay in the kitchen, cook, and clean. They thought that they could not manage to do things that men could and did not trust them with a man's job.
Many people face trials and tribulations day to day that mold them into the individuals they are destined to be. These could be positive or negative trials and tribulations, but either way, experiences ultimately are the major key to people’s growth and perception of the world around them. These experiences may be brought on by external factors such as who people surround themselves with (i.e. friends and relationships), neighborhoods and what is considered the “norm” for said neighborhood (i.e. gun violence, gang involvements, drugs, etc.), influences from parents or other caregivers and the amount of time they devote to the growing child. Many people are granted the same opportunity as others, but they let these extrinsic factors sway them from their destinations and wind up in situations based on how they handled previous situations. This idea is true in the novel The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates written by Wes Moore. In this novel, Wes Moore gives the detailing truth about how people are affected negatively by their decisions everyday, but also how positive influences such as role models and caring families have a positive effect on the development and destination of a child. The paths that both the Wes Moores took in life could have easily converged and been taken on by the other. No matter one’s predetermined outcome in life, his or her life can still be drastically shifted due to external influences and resources, much
n the novel The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls, Jeannette realizes that she was basically living and was being raised on her own since her parents weren't always there. In the novel The Other Wes Moore by Wes Moore, the author Wes Moore realized that he wanted to change his life when he realized how fast everything was going, such as his life and school. The other Wes Moore wanted to change his life because he was tired of often running in the streets since he realized how the drugs were ruining his life. We often see how they are realizing or regretting the decisions they made which leads to them wanted to change that.
The author portrays himself as a Realist in the book and one of the characteristics of a Realist is that humans control their own destinies
Change is something that happens to everyone, and it can shape one’s future. Whether it be one personally adjusting their ethics, location, or habits, or someone who is close modifying themselves in a similar way, everyone experiences some change. This change occurs everywhere and throughout one’s daily life and it can create a lasting impact. In The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver, there are many changes that the Price family experiences. At the start of the book this change relies on the influence of a change in location has on the family, but as the book progresses this change reflects more on the change of the values that each woman of the family faces. Throughout the novel, the idea that change can force one to adjust their
For example, in the book “The Glass Castle”, written by Jeannette Walls, Jeannette is a woman who finally is living “her dream life” after all the trouble she went through as a little girl. Growing up in a family who had always been dysfunctional somehow affected her mentally because that set her real goals in a position she had clear. Consequently, she had an education, found a job she truly loved, and had a loving husband (everything she once wished for). The effects of all of these accomplishments were that she still wasn’t happy with the life she lived. She wanted her parents to live a life in which they would no longer had to search for clothes in trash cans and could go home to a warm dinner every night. The results of trying to convince her parents to change that part of their lives was in vain because they refused to live a comfortable life. They were happy living a homeless life. Jeannette understood that trying to change who her parents were was hopeless because they didn’t feel the need to change the way they were managing their lives. Jeannette tried to solve an obstacle in her parent’s life, but in the end she let them live the way they wanted to because she knew that that was how they were truly
A positive mind is what is needed the most for when you are trying to make a huge life decision. In The Bean Trees we see some characters that have the biggest hearts and open minds. This leads to them caring for other people, even if they are not related, even if they just met them. There is this article named “Brainology” that talks about the impact and the importance of having a open, or what they call a growth mindset. The idea is that with a growth mindset you are more likely not to give up on challenges right away. Whereas a fixed mindset as soon as you fail you feel as if you’re not going to get it and you give up. We see this in the book throughout the whole story. We see this esoechaily with the mother figures, even though Lou Anne has low self esteem and frightened of everything we see her build her confidence throughout the book. We see this mindset with Esmeralda, helping Taylor out in the end with a really big favor. We even see this with the social worker that questions Taylor. She sees that Taylor really cares for Turtle and goes out of her way to help her adopt her. This growth mindset runs through all the women in the story because they have to be driven in order to have a good life.
Why do many strive to become independent or just do something bigger in life? With Updike’s “A&P” and Welty’s “Why I Live at the P.O.”, we get a first person look into two similar but different people’s lives and struggles. In “Why I Live at the P.O.” sister is the main character and the narrator. The same is for “A&P” but Sammy is the main character and narrator. Sammy and Sister throughout the stories battle with their want of being independent. Sister is jealous of her younger sister Stella-Rondo’s life from the beginning saying “She always had anything in the world she wanted and then she’d throw it away” (Welty 261). Like sister Sammy was always in search for a way to become independent or his own person in life. Sammy though
In the book “A Lesson Before Dying” we see that it’s actually forces out of our control that determine
Journalist John Tierney, in his article, “Do You Have Free Will? Yes, It’s the Only Choice,” explores the notion of free will and exhibits how belief or disbelief in free will affects an individual’s life. By posing a hypothetical situation through rhetorical questions, incorporating experimental research, and using accusatory diction towards the opposing perspective, Tierney conveys his perception that a regard for free will allows for individuals to gain a greater sense of morality and ambition, even if the notion of free will is still disputed.
Whether we have free will is widely controversial. The absence of a universal definition poses a primary problem to this question. In this essay, I shall base my argument on a set of three conditions for free will: 1) that the actor is unconstraint in his action, 2) the actor could have acted otherwise and 3) the actor must be ‘ultimately responsible’ (Kane, 2005: 121) for his action. After I have explained them, I shall apply these conditions to three scenarios that cover most, if not any, circumstances that occur when taking choices. The purpose of this essay is to show that if my conditions are true, none of the scenarios is based on free will and thus we do not have free will.
The story of two sisters, Melissa and Melinda, is one of deep philosophical analysis. The harsh scenario is of the two sisters’ brother, Matthew, who is involved in a horrific accident that essentially leaves him brain dead and only alive through a complex network of life support systems. According to Matthew’s last will and testament, he states specifically that if something of this sort ever happens to him, both sisters must mutually agree upon the ultimate decision of whether or not to proverbially “pull the plug.” This is a massive decision that will take great deliberation upon both parties to inevitably come to common terms with one another. Essentially, both sisters have their own aspect of what they should do regarding
After the Civil War, realism became a dominant form of writing in the United States, with writers attempting to write about everyday life. After realism came naturalism, a form of writing similar to realism, but with more pessimism. One of the reasons for this pessimism stems from free will and the question of whether people possess it or not. In realism, it is definitely true, while in naturalism it seems less so, but the options are often less than ideal. Because choices do exist for characters, free will is still there, which indicates that naturalism is a derivative form of realism. In Stephen Crane’s “Maggie: A Girl of the Streets,” the characters may have little chance to escape the world they inhabit, like Maggie, Jimmie, and