preview

Effects Of Title I Funding

Better Essays
According to the U.S. Department of Education, the Title I funding program is depicted as a policy that “provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers or high percentages of children from low-income families to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards” (“Title I, Part A Program”). The program was intended to close the gap between low income students and others with sufficient income. The policy was introduced January 12, 1965 and passed on April 9, 1965. Throughout time, Title I funding has been thought to be efficient ad successful, however, there is new evidence and data contradicting this statement. Title I funding negatively affected students because it…show more content…
Therefore, the policy has not fulfilled its purpose of eliminating the gap between low income students and high income students. Secondly, the program enabled schools to view scholars as statistics. According to the U.S. Department of Education, “Schools enrolling at least 40 percent of children from low-income families are eligible to use Title I funds for school wide programs designed to upgrade their entire educational programs to improve achievement for all students…” (“Title I, Part A Program”). This set limit allowed schools to view their population as percentages to meet eligibility requirements and care more about the financial portion rather than the educational portion when it comes to the policy. According to U.S. News & World Report, “Michael Dannenberg, director of strategic initiatives for policy at Education Reform Now stated, ‘To be clear, the wealthiest school districts are getting more per Title I child than high poverty school districts’” (“Title I: Rich School Districts Get Millions Meant for Poor Kids”). Also, according to Brookings, “They found no evidence of effective professional development programs. They did find evidence of massive expenditures on professional development…” (“Why federal spending on disadvantaged students (Title I) doesn't work”). Therefore, the funding is going to the wrong
Get Access