Electronic Fetal Monitoring ( Internal Or External )

Even when confronted, the girl continued to insist that she was pregnant with triplets. Then, the day before her C-section was scheduled, she said she miscarried. The girl refused to go the hospital

For hundred of years, women have wrestled with their womanhood, bodies, and what it means to be a woman in our society. Being a woman comes with a wonderful and empowering responsibility--giving birth. What sets us aside from other countries is that the process and expectations of giving birth has changed in our society; coming from midwifery, as it has always been since the early times, to hospitals where it is now expected to give birth at. Midwifery was a common practice in delivering babies in

In the past, in the United States the majority of women delivered at home with no anesthetics; women might have received assistance through a family doctor, including midwife care (Thomas, 2011). A radical change happened by the 1960s, when hospital childbirths had become the norm, the pain of the experience was reduced by epidural anesthesia controlled by a physician. Pregnant women received education on breastfeeding and other topics during their medical visits (Thomas, 2011).

The significance that this mother did not receive prenatal care is that the risks for having a premature delivery could have been reduced or eliminated completely. The mother could have been put on medications to stop early labor like Magnesium sulfate to relax the smooth muscle of the uterus and stop contractions, progesterone to prevent early labor, and monitoring fetal heart rate patterns in order to report any complications to the attending provider caring for the patient. Progesterone reduces the risk of delivering a baby early, before 37 weeks gestation, in mothers who are pregnant with just a single fetus or a mother who previously had a premature birth of a fetus (Progesterone Treatment, 2014, para. 4). In

home with just a midwife. Mary had not pushed the placenta out and Mrs. Blenkinsop had

Hadassah’s mother, Henna described her pregnancy as fairly normal. She planned this second pregnancy with her husband, Craig. They used prenatal care throughout the pregnancy, which included ultrasounds and a test for diabetes. She did not have an

This is a very interesting story and a victorious one too. Maternal-child nurses are faced with complex dilemma that requires careful consideration. This couple would have been disappointed if they wife had finally ended up getting epidural injection after laboring for hours. I am glad you used your critical thinking to advocate for this family. Our job is to do what is best for our patient.

“Today, many if not most obstetricians do not attend births: they perform fetal extractions through the vagina or through an abdominal cut.” Faith Gibson (p.37)

According to “Human Sexuality: Diversity in Contemporary America,” women and couples planning the birth of a child have decisions to make in variety of areas: place of birth, birth attendant(s), medication, preparedness classes, circumcision, breast feeding, etc. The “childbirth market” has responded to consumer concerns, so its’ important for prospective consumers to fully understand their options. With that being said, a woman has the choice to birth her child either at a hospital or at home. There are several differences when it comes to hospital births and non-hospital births.

Louise was a nulliparous woman in her thirties who had no pregnancy complications and nothing sinister in her medical history, so she was classed as “low risk” and she was 7 days over her estimated due date. Louise came on to the delivery suite and my mentor and I were looking after her throughout her labour, her partner was away at work so Louise only had us for support.

The strange birth of her first child ended up being caused by a medical mistake.

Epidurals were used to ease the pain during the birthing process. Women started using the epidurals during the 1960s . Unmedicated births usually left women with negative physical effects as well as the babies. It also left the women unable to take care of their newborn child. Monitoring the babies became easier with more technology. Before, babies could only be monitored by using a stethoscope. In the 1960s, the electronic fetal monitor was introduced to hospitals. Doctors used the ultrasound to let the soon-to-be mothers hear their baby’s heartbeat. The chance of a newborn surviving birth increased as medical knowledge during the Cold War developed. Back then, women faced the fear of having difficulties during birth. Now, most women expect a healthy childbirth thanks to the technology produced during the Cold

Since the 1970s electronic fetal monitoring has grown to be the single most prevalent obstetrical intervention, used in over 85 percent of hospital births as of 2010 (ACOG Practice Bulletin 132). Electronic fetal monitoring is intended to detect abnormalities in

monitor fetal heartbeat. In the first stage of labor , the neck of the uterus,