The short stories “The Story of an Hour” and “The Interlopers” are very different in some ways and very similar in others. The main character, Mrs. Mallard, in “The Story of an Hour” received news that her husband had been killed in a work accident. At first she is distraught, but soon she realizes that she is free from her bad marriage. Mrs. Mallard, whose health was failing, started dancing and shouting “Free”, her sister, who was downstairs, ran up to check on her. When Mrs. Mallard’s sister opened the door she told her sister to stop shouting and suggested coming downstairs. When Mrs. Mallard came downstairs, her husband walked through the door, this unexpected shock caused Mrs. Mallard to have a heart attack, and die on the spot. This is a form of irony known as …show more content…
In “The Story of an Hour”, Mr. Mallard is expected to be be dead, and Mrs. Mallard is expected to live, but Mr. Mallard is alive, and Mrs. Mallard dies. Something similar happens is “The Interlopers”.
In “The Interlopers” the main characters, Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym, are carrying on the feud between their two families. This feud is about which family owns the forest that separates the two families properties. In this story, the main characters meet in the forest while hunting. Ulrich and Georg tell each other that their hunting parties are not far behind them, and when their men find them someone is going to die. As the men are threatening one another, a deadly storm uproots a nearby tree, and the tree lands on the men, pinning them to the
In this story, the two irony’s that we’re used are the situational (or cosmic) irony and the dramatic irony, because when Mrs. Mallard had gotten the news that her husband was killed in the railroad disaster of course she cried, but when she went into her room to probably take in all that was going on, that’s when her true feelings came out. She felt a sense of relief and a sense of freedom in the fact that soon she will be able to just please herself and not have to deal with someone else’s demands. But come to find out the roles reversed when she went downstairs with her sister and that front door opened, her husband walked right in with no harm done to him. Out of shock, she collapsed and died. These ironies are related because nothing
However, the story ends with Mrs Mallard’s freedom being ripped away from her as she dies from shock upon seeing her husband walk through the door. When the doctors come to pronounce her dead, they said “she had died of heart disease, … the joy that kills”. This is foreshadowed that the beginning of the story when it is said that Mrs Mallard “was afflicted with heart trouble”. Also this use of irony suggests how the male ideology of the doctors is foolish and misplaced.
The heroine, Mrs. P, has some carries some characteristics parallel to Louise Mallard in “Hour.” The women of her time are limited by cultural convention. Yet, Mrs. P, (like Louise) begins to experience a new freedom of imagination, a zest for life , in the immediate absence of her husband. She realizes, through interior monologues, that she has been held back, that her station in life cannot and will not afford her the kind of freedom to explore freely and openly the emotions that are as much a part of her as they are not a part of Leonce. Here is a primary irony.
And eventually die together as comrades. In the story of an hour the irony is whenever Mrs. Mallard neighbors find out that her husband has died they try to break the news to her softly so that she will not die from her heart condition, but it turns out that her husband never died in a train wreck, so her surprise at seeing him walk in the door alive causes her to die. “
"The Interlopers" an "The story of an hour" are both very eventful short stories. The characters and setting of both stories have big life changing decisions. There is a lot of differences but there is also a lost of similarities.
Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym have a life long rivalry, they even pray misfortune upon one another. When Ulrich snuck away to find Georg and kill him, his demeanor was not fulfilled at all. In fact the story took a turn for the worst, yet the best. They had guns pointed ready to aim and a tree fell on them. They woke stuck next to each other trapped under the tree cursing each
This essay will go through and explain the comparative and contrasting points of the two short stories I read in my English Lit and Comp class.Two men who come from families with a long history of rivialry amongst each other have to work together in order to try and get out of their fatal condition. While we also have a woman with critical health issues and doesn't have a loving passion with her husband. These two stories sound to most about very different topics, and that they are but I will show you the comparitive and contrasting points from each story. Starting with the short story The Interlopers, two men who come from different families, feuding over a stip of land flourishing in game, they poached on eachother and rallied over. Now jumping
In “The Story of an Hour” we see Mrs. Louise Mallard receives news of the death of her husband. The
While patrolling this strip of woodland one dark and stormy night, Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym found themselves face to face, only to have a heavy beech tree fall on them, trapping them both, leaving no limbs free to fire a gun for help or to dispatch the other, permanently.
I chose to do my analysis on the short story, “The Story Of An Hour”. The themes I see in this story is the quest for identity/coming of age, romantic/love, birth, and death. It is about a woman named Mrs. Mallard. She was an elderly lady and had a heart complications. Her sister Josephine and her husband’s friend Richards had to break the news to her that her husband, Brently Mallard, has been killed in a railroad disaster. Mrs. Mallard was sorrowful and sobbed in her sisters’ arms. After her grieving process, she wanted to be alone, so she went to her room and locked herself in. As she sat in the window, she seem to be calmer and accepted her husband’s death. She was not distressed of what had happened. She began to say the words “free” and her heart
In the beginning of both stories, the characters are very unhappy with their situation. Ulrich is angry with his poaching neighbor, and then upset that he is trapped under a fallen tree, and Mrs. Mallard is unhappy because she has just been informed that her husband is dead. As the stories progress, the characters unexpectedly begin to change their minds about the events that are taking place. Ulrich decides that maybe the tree has trapped him and his enemy together to help them see how insignificant their feud really is compared to the important things in life. Mrs. Mallard realizes that the decease of her husband leaves her free. By the time the climax is reached, the main characters in both stories are delighted with the course of events. And then, when all seems well, an ironic twist at the end of each story leaves the main characters dead! The plots of these two stories actually have many
Short stories are always very enjoyable to read. They are very concise but mostly have such a deep message resonating throughout the text that the reader is left pondering over an extension of the story to imagine the possible ending if they were novels instead. The works under consideration are meant to be compared because of their unique theme which reflects how two authors can write similar yet distinctive stories in different times. Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” and “The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant are two such short stories whose themes center around role of gender and marriage with special focus on the female characters. Even though there are similarities, there are also
“The Interlopers” and “The Story of an Hour” both have some similarities and some differences between them. They both start out as completely different stories, but further into the stories, it is easier to find the similarities between the two. The main storylines are nothing alike. The settings of the two are completely different, such as both stories have happiness before they die, which in both stories they do in fact die; and while one deals with physical struggle and the other with emotional, they both contain emotional resolutions. However, they share similarities in terms of use of irony and also the ending of each story.
"The Story of an Hour" involves one married couple and when the wife, Mrs. Mallard, hears her husband has died in a railroad disaster she breaks down into tears. Moments after sitting in her chair weeping she begins to feel free to do as she wants now that he has passed on. As she approaches the stairs in her home the door opens and her husband stands alive and well. When the doctors arrive they say Mrs. Mallard ."..had died of a heart disease-of joy that kills." In both of these short stories the wives seem to share the foul qualities of selfishness, unfaithfulness and confusion.
“The Story of an Hour” tells the story about Mrs. Mallard, who learns that her husband is dead and right after that faces a great variety of emotions and feelings. Mrs. Mallard has a heart problem. One day she gets news that her husband has died in a railroad disaster. She starts crying at once, goes upstairs and locks herself in her room. She feels very lonely at first but then she starts feeling happy and free from her marriage. After some time she opens the door and descends the stairs. She surprisingly sees Mr. Mallard at the door. When she looks at Mr. Mallard, she dies suddenly. The doctor says that she dies of her heart disease, from the "joy that kills." This story illustrates the dependent condition and status of married women in the 19th century and reveals the fact that there is no way of escaping from marriage except one’s death.