The story takes place in the futuristic dystopia of the probably 1990′s, where the police are useless and the gangs come out at night. Alex and his droogs are one of these gangs. They spend their nights drinking drug laced milk, getting into gang wars, and committing some good old rape and ultra-violence. Tension arises between the group which leads to Alex getting arrested. While imprisoned, he is introduced to a new rehabilitation technique sponsored by the government that promises to cure him of his violent nature. But it proves to be much worse than Alex anticipated, as just the mere thought of sex or violence makes him feel deathly sick. We see Alex’s journey from a violent criminal to a poor “victim of society.”
This movie is pretty famous and kind of everywhere, but you know what I’ve noticed? I’ve seen clips from this movie before, and all of them are from the beginning, what would constitute the first 7 chapters of the novel.
…show more content…
I know, we’re not supposed to like him, but I don’t just hate him as a person, I just don’t like him as a character either. And that’s not supposed to happen. Even if you don’t like a character’s actions and personality, you should still be interested enough to care about their story, and I don’t. I don’t care what happens to him or even whether he gets what he deserves or doesn’t in the end. Alex just doesn’t interest me enough to make me love this movie.
What I do love is the setting. Not much of the time period is described in the book, so the movie fills in a lot of the gaps and I really loved what they did. It’s a weird, surreal 70′s version of 90′s or 00′s England, with strange red one piece suits and purple hair and white EVERYTHING. Retro futurism is pretty aesthetically pleasing, I must say. I also enjoyed the Nadsat slang peppered throughout the movie (it’s EVERYWHERE in the book and so annoying to read in the beginning, although by end it became my favorite
Ultimately the book was fantastic but the movie wasn’t as far as good in my personal opinion. It was one of the best books I’ve had ever read. At first it goes slow but as you get to know the characters and the plot you get addicted to the book and can’t stop reading in a good
I much preferred the movie version to the novel. For me, author William Kennedy’s style of writing is needlessly vague and difficult to follow, yet he did a wonderful job adapting
Despite having many differences the film remains faithful in capturing the novel and putting on film. While one may not get everything from the movie as from the book, the majority of it is there. So for die hard fans of the book there is no need for disappointment. All the main parts of the book are there, the characters, the plot, the setting
The novel and the movie were both very suspenseful. The main characters are both the same in the book and in the movie but are a little bit different then their counter partners in the novel/movie. In both the movie and
At the beginning of the scene in the book, Darry stepped up to take on anyone, and an old football teammate of his challenged him. Then came running around the corner, ready to fight (Hinton 123-127). The movie depicts this scene exactly how the book does. This is the first similarity is only one of many.
- This book is a really good book not a very good movie because they have so many differences if they would have not started in the middle of the book then it would have been really good and entertaining but it just doesn't give me the vision in my head of the whole book . A movie to me is where a book comes to life and, but it still was a good movie but could have been
Finally there are lots of differences between the book and the movie. They also show that the movie was a lot weaker then then the book. I can see the movies aren't always better than the books. The books go more into detail than the movie. I enjoined the movie because it is more visual. The book was a little
In part one of the novel, we witness the ability of free will that Alex possesses and his ability to choose between good and evil through contrast presented by darkness of night and lightness of day. At the beginning of the novel, Alex and his droogs (friends), Pete, Georgie, and Dim are at the Kovova Milkbar, roaming the streets and committing violent acts during night. Alex and his droogs encounter an old man who is drunk and is singing a sentimental song. Alex instantly chooses the path of evil with the free will that he encompasses, and along with his droogs they beat the old man while laughing at his misery. The old man complains about the “stinking world” and says, “It’s a stinking world because it lets the young get on to the old like you done, and there’s no law nor order no more.” (Part 2, Chapter 2, Page 12) At night, Alex uses violence and chooses to beat, rape, and murder innocent people because it shows that he has freedom of choice and has authority and power in society. Alex’s interpretation of darkness and night is, “The night belonged to me and my droogs and all the rest of the nadsats (teenagers), and the starry bourgeois lurked indoors…” (Part 1, Chapter 4, Page 33). In contrast,
For the most part, the novel was very enjoyable. One aspect of it that I loved was that the storyline was extremely intense, which always compelled me to find out what would happen next. For example,
Alex realizes that at eighteen he is no longer a child, but rather an adult who has not yet amounted to anything. He comes to realize that he would like to start a family of his own, with a wife and son like Pete. He makes a comparison between youth and a windup toy, saying how they continue moving forward in one direction until there is something to block its path. He says that this is a fundamental fact of youth: youth will always make mistakes, as he has, and that this is what leads to the growth into an adult. He realizes the connection that exists between violence and youth, and that free will is more than just violence but making choices based on morality and thought rather than
The book tells the same story as the movie but in a different way it cuts out thing the movies has or the movies adds thing that's not in the book. The book has some not many similar but . I feel the director was unfaithful to the book.The book and movie version of Our America had many differences.
With many scenes taken away because some characters are never mentioned took away a lot of the overall meaning of the story. I didn’t feel to relate to the movie as much as I did with the novel. Leaving an apt amount of scenes out, took away some of the anticipation I was building up to. Which made me a bit disappointed.
Unlike the book, the movie is very visual with lots of sounds and exciting twists. Since I have read the novella I didn’t really care that much for the movie because I knew what was going to happen at the end. The one thing I was hoping for was that there was a new scene or new storyline. There wasn’t really a new
It is rare a movie inspires me to read the novel it is based on. Here is one occasion. On my first viewing of the
Anthony Burgess has been heralded as one of the greatest literary geniuses of the twentieth century. Although Burgess has over thirty works of published literature, his most famous is A Clockwork Orange. Burgess’s novel is a futuristic look at a Totalitarian government. The main character, Alex, is an "ultra-violent" thief who has no problem using force against innocent citizens to get what he wants. The beginning of the story takes us through a night in the life of Alex and his Droogs, and details their adventures that occupy their time throughout the night. At fifteen years old, Alex is set up by his Droogs—Pete,