Essay On Death With Dignity

I do support Death with Dignity Act, similar to the one in Oregon, to be implemented in other states. Death with Dignity allows a terminally ill patient, who has zero possibility of recovering with any kind medical treatment, to rest in peace at will. These are voluntary unlike Euthanasia. An eligible person, which would be a terminally ill patient in this case, can request the prescription and can choose if and when to take it. The case of Brittany Maynard clearly shows that patients who are sick and whose sufferings cannot be relieved , should have a choice to put an end to the pain and have a peaceful death with near and dear ones by their side. Dying with excruciating pain and suffering, within four walls of hospital with restlessness and

Assisted suicide is the suicide of a terminally- ill patient, achieved by using a prescribed drug from a doctor for that specific purpose. It is legal in only six states in the United States of America including: Oregon, Montana, Washington, Colorado, Vermont, and California. Countries such as Germany, Japan, and Switzerland have legalized assisted suicide in past years. It has been disputed for many years and continues to be a controversial issue whether physicians should be authorized to end an individual’s life with their prescription and if this should be done legally.

Currently, physician-assisted suicide or death is illegal in all states except Oregon, Vermont, Montana and Washington. Present law in other states express that suicide is not a crime, but assisting in suicide is. Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that the moral right to life should encompass the right to voluntary death. Opponents of assisted suicide claim that society has a moral and civic duty to preserve the lives of innocent persons. There is a slippery slope involving the legalizing assisted suicide. Concern that assisted suicide allowed on the basis of mercy or compassion, can and will lead to the urging of the death for morally unjustifiable reasons is

The process of assisted suicide, or physician-assisted death, is a hotly debated topic that still remains at the forefront of many national discussions today. Assisted suicide can be described as the suicide of patient by a physician-prescribed dose of legal drugs. The reason that this topic is so widely debated is that it infringes on several moral and religious values that many people in the United States have. But, regardless of the way that people feel, a person’s right to live is guaranteed to them in the United States Constitution, and this should extend to the right to end their own life as well. The reasons that assisted suicide should be legalized in all states is because it can ease not only the suffering of the individual, but the financial burden on the family that is supporting him/her. Regardless of opposing claims, assisted suicide should be an option for all terminally ill patients.

Did you know that illegal drugs from Mexico, used for suicide are being smuggled to New Zealand and Australia? As assisted suicide is illegal in these countries, people must rebel against the government and rely on bootlegged medicine to end their sufferings. The World Medical Association (WMA) works to establish the highest standards for physicians´ ethical and professional behavior. WMA recognizes Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) as “knowingly and intentionally providing a person with the knowledge or means or both required to commit suicide” (Harris 55). This concept includes advising individuals of lethal doses, prescribing, and supplying the drugs. Originating from Oregon 's Death with Dignity Act, the Death with Dignity National Center serves to promote options for terminally ill individuals. In the United States, only four states: California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington have a Death with Dignity law. According to the New York Times, most of those who requested an assisted suicide "feared a loss of autonomy, dignity and decreasing ability to participate in activities that made life enjoyable” (Pope). In recent years, the ethics and legalization of physician-assisted suicide has only grown in complexity. Mimi M from Chicago commented under the article, "legalizing assisted suicide only creates more options for the terminally ill." Many who favor the legalization believe that if they are able to refuse life-saving treatments, they should also be able to end their

Furthermore, there is one specific state that has approved this assistance with a few regulations in mind. The State of Oregon, which also happens to have been the first state in the United States to legalize a death with dignity act. The very first act that they made was on November 8th, 1994, but as all other cases do, it contained specific requirements from The State of Oregon for patients who wished to participate. They state only permitted patients who had a terminal illness. Specifically an illness that results with their death in a matter of a few months left of being alive. Other individuals who simply wanted to end their life are not permitted to proceed in this act. Without a reasonable explanation, there was simply no need for

Some states and countries allow physical assisted suicide to patients who are deemed terminally ill. Every year thousands of patients are place in hospice care, only to be given an estimated time frame of how long they have to live. During this time, these patients are suffering from terminal diseases and conditions. In 1994, Oregon became the first state to write the Death with Dignity act into law. For those suffering from terminal illness this was great news. However, this controversial law would soon be repealed in 1997, only to be reinstated in 2006. Ever since then, other states have exercised their rights to adopt similar laws and others have not due to the controversy surrounding this topic. Although some states have endorsed this topic,

In 1983 twenty-five-year old Nancy Cruzan was driving when her car careened off the road and flipped over. She was thrown out of her car into a ditched and was left lying there unconscious. Her body was victim to its surroundings and to fate. When she was found by paramedics, she was unconscious and not breathing. They concluded that she had not been breathing for at least fifteen minutes, but through the miracles of modern technology she was revived into a vegetative state (Gumm). This began a long crusade for Nancy Cruzan and her family and only added to the enduring debate about euthanasia. Should a person be able to control when to end his life? I believe that a person should control when life ends while facing a terminal illness or

Brittany Maynard brought up a good argument when she said, “I would not tell anyone else that he or she should choose death with dignity. My question is: Who has the right to tell me that I don’t deserve this choice?” (Slotnik). Brittany Maynard was a young woman who found out she had a terminal brain cancer and ended up becoming the public face for the right to die act. Many people believe that this act should not be in place, but in taking this act away people lose their right to choose when they want to die. People may argue the fact that doctors have access the drug with assisted suicide is very unsettling; however, the doctors are professionals who are trusted with this drug. This act is important because it gives the terminally ill one last independent decision before they lose themselves. Taking away the act means taking their free will away from them.

The right to die with dignity is a very controversial topic. Some have not even heard of this either because the state they live in hasn’t legalized it, or because it never was brought up in their lives before. Since the early nineteen-nineties, this law has been debated about and brought up numerous times in terminally ill cases. Lately, especially since four states have legalized it and 50% of the states, not including the ones that have already legalized it, have considered permitting the death with dignity law while some people are still against it.

If you don’t want something to happen to your body (e.g. for your body to become pregnant or for it to be kept working at all costs (both in terms of money and dignity), then you should have that right as well (Munkittrick, 2011, para. 11 & 12)”.

It is thought that the presumed vulnerable would be left helpless if physician-assisted suicide were legalized, though evidence shows this claim is false. People presumed vulnerable to physician assisted suicide are the uninsured, the poor, people with little education, people older than 80, women, people with mental illnesses, people with physical disabilities, minors and racial and ethnic minorities. There is no evidence supporting the claim that any of these groups have been adversely affected since physician-assisted suicide was legalized in Oregon in 1997. Since the law was passed in 1997, 460 patients have died from ingesting physician prescribed medication under the Death with Dignity Act (Department of Human Services, 2010). In 2009 a total of 59 deaths were from physician-assisted suicide; 98.3 percent were white, 48.3 percent had at least a bachelors degree, 98.7 percent had health insurance, and 78 percent were between 55 and 84 years-old (Department of Human Services, 2010). These statistics clearly show the vulnerable have not been poorly affected by the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.

Death with dignity can be seen as a very sensitive subject for a lot of people and for people with certain religions. Death with dignity can be seen is a horrible thing it can be perceived is the doctors trying to do the work of God but in reality they are just trying to alleviate the pain of people who are suffering from terminal illnesses. The state of Oregon won their case against the people who started to go against them in 2005. These allow doctors to prescribe legal drugs that will slowly begin to kill people this issue was controversial because they feel like it is wrong for doctors to want to help to kill another patient but at the same time the patient could be tired of suffering and you never know what type of pain the patient may

Many people who oppose the right to die are young people who have no idea what it’s like to actually experience pain and suffering. It’s like someone who’s never had sugar to take candy from a baby because “it tastes bad.” The dictionary defines depression as, “sad; dejected… sunk below its surroundings”, none of which say anything about physical pain. The definition of suicide, according to authors Margaret O. Hyde and Elizabeth Forsyth, is “the act of intentionally destroying oneself” (15). While suicide altogether is never a light topic, it does make it easier to discuss when the patient is physically in pain and is asking a doctor for help. This only happens when both the patient and the doctor are out of options. If a person is able to function normally, then they should not be allowed to ask to die. By choosing death, the patient has a safe, painless opportunity to end his or her life instead of living in pain until he or she dies “naturally”. The right to die should be a human right whether it’s based on financial issues, misery and pain, spiritual reasons, moral issues or not, given the right circumstance, of

Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia are terms used to define the method in which a close relative and/or doctor of an ill or disabled individual, participates in an activity which directly or indirectly leads to the death of said individual (Garg, Chanana, Rai, Gargi, 2010). Due to the humanistic desire to end the individuals suffering and pain, the behavior is supported by the relative(s) and healthcare (Garg, Chanana, Rai, Gargi, 2010). Since euthanasia is not a standard form of care, the attitudes and practices of the matter vary. Amongst the different opinions of the method comes the separation of states. Throughout the United States, only four states have legalized physician-assisted suicide: Oregon, Vermont, Washington and Montana