preview

Essay On El Predio

Decent Essays

Finally, I argue, that by using a silent approach, that is, by not consciously using voiceover or providing historical explanations, these documentaries distance themselves from testimonio, first-person narratives, the “subjective turn” and “the performative documentary” that characterized the “first wave” (to use a term coined by Idelber Avelar) of postdictatorship documentary films in Argentina. In this sense, the films dialogue with Gastón Gordillo’s differentiation between haunting and memory. For Gordillo: “Strictly speaking, a haunting is distinct from memory, for it is not reducible to narratives articulated linguistically; it is, rather, an affect created by an absence that exerts a hard-to-articulate, nondiscursive, yet positive …show more content…

The film provides no historical background about the place and its afterlives or about the most recent Argentine dictatorship (1976–1983); it simply documents different artistic and social projects that take place there. On the one hand, the projects appear as both polyphonic and disjointed and thus raise thought-provoking questions about the nature of memory sites and their uses. On the other hand, with its silent approach, El predio breaks with testimonial narratives and the “subjective turn,” as well as with the notion that only those related by blood ties to the detained-and-disappeared have the right to talk about the recent …show more content…

Reminiscent of Pierre Nora’s often-quoted ideas about modern societies’ obsession with memory as a sign of an incapacity to truly remember, Perel’s film questions the uses of memory sites and therefore functions as a countermonument. For James E. Young, countermonuments “challenge the very premise of the monument.” They are created by a new generation of artists for whom the possibility that terrible events “might be reduced to exhibitions of public craftsmanship or cheap pathos remains intolerable.” Like a countermonument, El predio “reject[s] the traditional forms and reasons for public memorial art, those spaces that either console viewers or redeem tragic events, or indulge in a facile kind of [reparation that would] purport to mend the memory of a murdered people.” Therefore the film makes it incumbent upon the spectator to form a narrative about the past and judge the urgency or banality of certain memory practices. Symbolic of this open-endedness, in the final scene, the open door of the former ESMA invites the spectator, who is situated on the other side of the gate, to intervene, to appropriate the space and construct memories connected to the social struggles of the

Get Access