My view on what the discussion panel stated on “What keep them up at night” is they all have the same fear in regards to terrorism, which is interesting since they are all in intelligence to some degree. What this shows me is the threat is real and viable, if its keeping people awake at night. The panel explained that an attack on the homeland is the greatest threat, and I do have to agree with their statements, especially after looking at who they are in their respected agency within DHS. I see both sides of the answer to this question. On one side, the saying of “too many hands in the cookie jar”, holds true, which can cause issues between the multiple intelligence agencies, especially at the lower level of field agents. On the other …show more content…
I’m not surprised about Hezbollah, they are a well funded, strong organization with a large amount of individuals within the group, and have a safe haven in Lebanon. It does not influence my outlook on the local and federal law enforcement. It just shows the two can work together and successfully bring down a terrorist cell within the U.S.
Video: Who, in your view, presents the clearest argument? With which of the two arguments presented in the debate do you align yourself? I think Michelle Malkin presented the better argument. She presented relevant facts and was not trying to pull on the heartstrings of the audience, like Geraldo did. She also came across more professional and well versed in the topic, even writing a book on immigration. I align myself with Michelle Malkin and not with Geraldo Rivera. My view is they, illegal immigrants, committed a crime and did not follow the laws of the U.S., instead took the time to break the rules in order to cheat the system. In almost every other country, Immigration is very strict and illegals would not be allowed and they would be deported.
Video: Did the information contained in this video surprise you? What effect does the information have on your sense of security? Why do you think we are not putting the same amount of effort into cybersecurity as the other countries mentioned – Russia, China? Aside from risks posed by hackers and
Every day, law enforcement officers encounter danger while carrying out their duties. The foremost duty of law enforcement officers are to serve and protect citizens. Most law enforcement agencies do this successfully. However, many people view law enforcement officers as the enemy. People need to be better informed about law enforcement and why officers take specific actions in certain circumstances. In our society, police are in a very dangerous position when it comes to the amount of force they can use when dealing with an individual. Officers use discretion when deciding the best course of action for the situation, whether it be physical force, persuasion, or coercion. They must take the correct course of action, because if they are too lenient or to forceful, even when dealing with petty things, they can be reprimanded by superiors and the public. Should police use force? Which circumstances warrant use force and what are the limits of force they can use? These questions are often asked when police are compelled to use force.
In the 1800s, America became extremely industrialized. Due to all of the new upbringings there was a need for organized policing. Policing in America went through many different stages beginning with organized American law enforcement, to formal policing. Michael Moore and George Kelling inferred that there were three eras of policing; political era, professional era, and community era. The political era came first along, as that era began to go downhill, the professional era arose. As the professional era began to take drawbacks, the community era started up and is still going on in present day. There are many positives and some negatives in today’s society living in the community era.
Congress built upon the reforms of the 1970s by passing the Intelligence Oversight Act in 1980. This Act was an amendment to the Hughes-Ryan Act and obligated the IC to report covert actions to both the SSCI and the HPSCI prior to their implementation, unlike the ambiguous previous requirement of a timely manner. The Intelligence Oversight Act was noteworthy in that it constrained the intelligence community more than any previous legislation (Riley 2010). The two biggest shortfalls I see to the system is the number of contributors there are to the system on such a large scale. When I think about all of the redundancy built within the system, I think about all of the possible breakdown in communications that could take place. The second shortfall I see is the legislative leverage that is held over the Intelligence community. I personally believe this to be a mistake because this power could be held in a negative manner and to gain a political stance or agenda. The Congress can withhold money and resources, can leak information to the media and which could cause a mission or operation to
The Department of Homeland Security is responsible for securing our nation’s borders and transportation systems, they manage who and what enters our homeland and work to prevent the entry of terrorists and the instruments of terrorism. In addition, if it is really hard for the terrorist or the bad to enter the country. It will be extremely hard for them to attack the United States. Many suspicious terrorist groups and organizations are under a microscopic viewpoint from the group of Homeland Security because it is their job to help secure our borders, airports, seaports, and waterways. In the article it says, “Data suggest that, in the year after the attacks, agencies' participation in all of Stewart and Morris' homeland security activities was not high and statistically significant differences
United States Law Enforcement officers are constantly under pressure. Their job requires them to serve and protect mankind, under any circumstances, at all times. Because of this, officers run the risk of putting themselves in harmful situation. This may include apprehending a violent assailant, or entering harmful locations. In this study, I used books and articles such as, Criminal Justice Today, to get an understanding of the dangers Law Enforcement Officer face in the line of duty. When performing task outside the prescient, office4rs are put into dangerous situations because of their surroundings, offender’s actions, and officer mistakes. Due to the high stress of this job, it not only affects their performance, but their health as well.
In my opinion, Linda Chavez is right because it is not acceptable to disobey the law, if the amendment says everyone born in United States will be a citizen, then there shouldn’t be any discrimination to children born from immigrant parents. Also, we must be clear that every person in our country has the same rights, no matter where they come from. Therefore, if we want a better nation, we must never discriminate others for their race or color. Immigrants are people just like Native Americans who deserve a citizenship, why would the government take that away from them? We have never denied citizenship to children born in the US, and we must never try to start doing it now. However, Will believes that only a little change will get rid of all the problems of this country, but if it is so easy why are we still in the same spot? Why are we still suffering from
When it comes to anything about conflict in immigration there is always a huge debate. There are two sides to every story and both make very good supportive arguments. Some with very compelling statistical reports. But which are true? That’s for you to decide.
My views on immigration are slightly different than some of those of the candidates. I believe immigration is good for America if proper procedures are executed. Criminal background checks need to be enforced to curb drug trafficking and other criminal acts. Resources should be distributed to natural born citizens and legalized immigrants before given to those just entering our country.
I advocate for both legal and illegal immigrants because they both work hard, they both want to provide themselves and their families with a better future, they both contribute to this great country, they both have the same human rights, they are both valuable, they are both indispensable, they both love this country, and most importantly they are both equally American. They are our friends, neighbors, classmates, and parents. There are are young people in this nation who were brought here at a young age; they've learned, grown, and adapted to the American way; sending them back or preventing them from being fully recognized as U.S. citizens is a mistake. They have the intellect, the numbers, the passion, the drive, the resources, to make this nation even greater than it already is, all they need is a chance. Mr. Donavan you can give them the chance that they've been waiting for. We need your support so that congress can finally fix something that should've been fixed a long time ago. We need a permanent solution to a very important issue that just keeps getting delayed.
1. Identify and discuss the eight (8) recurring reasons that change occurs in law enforcement agencies.
Law enforcement officers have encountered some very deadly days. The life of a law enforcement officer is one of constantly being aware of your surroundings, dealing with the uncertainty of not knowing the individuals you have to approach, and being able to cope with the visual images seen after vicious crimes. The life of a law enforcement officer, who protects and serves, is both challenging and rewarding. The first law enforcement system was established in Boston, Massachusetts over 350 years ago. During this time in the Colonies that were not heavily populated, the sheriff served as the main law enforcement officer. During the 1800’s, 24-hour law enforcement service and systems similar to what is used today began to emerge (NLEMI). Law enforcement officers face incredible dangers. With over 900,000 law enforcement officers nationwide the Federal Bureau of Investigations reported approximately 1,165,383 violent crimes in 2014. Approximately one law enforcement officer dies every 61 hours (NLEMI).The law enforcement profession is the most challenging and dangerous career, because officers must be aware of every law and action they take at all times, manage constant training and stress, and protecting others as well as themselves in the line of duty.
Immigration is such a complicated topic. I really didn’t realize everything that went into it until I got to college and was able to vote myself. Although I have written thousands of words on this topic, I still am unsure if I can for certain say that I completely agree with one side of the argument or the other. What I do believe is the fact that immigration is a touchy issue, especially within the United States, and each case should be looked at differently.
We see this with the Department of Homeland Security taking lead on drug reduction and illegal border crossing. Vast amounts of intelligence and manpower are required for an effective homeland security program. Additionally, the crossflow of communication is key in-between the various agencies and departments within the government.
Rationale: This source has shown the document from the DHS on the subcommittee on intelligence, terrorism risk assessment, and information sharing between various different agencies. This
Everyone has an opinion of police officers; whether it’s positive, negative or indifferent. Regardless of the city, as soon as a person encounters an officer, that person will come away with a lasting impression, hopefully it’s a favorable one. Gone are the days of having extra time to meet people and engage in “community policing”. How often have you heard “I was pulled over by the nicest officer today and got 2 tickets that I totally deserved”, or “The police stopped and frisked me today because I matched the description of a suspect, but I understand they were just doing their jobs”? No, they were “harassed”, the tickets were “unfair”, or “those officers had nothing better to do”. Fewer still are people that truly understand the purpose, importance and the cause and effect of even “simple” traffic stops. (In the police academy instructors stress that there is no such thing as a “routine” traffic stop).